D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus

D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus

16.05.2015 Views

D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL – FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND A top­down database construction method (see section 4.5) for combining trade/transport/transhipment data sources is proposed which is based on the NEAC as developed by NEA and which was also used in INFOSTAT. 4.4 Data availability and reliability; an example The methods used in the top­down approach are very much dependent on the source data that are available. These sources can have very different structures (chain, O/D, aggregated flows through a node) and the transport flows described can be based on different definitions (trade, transport, only national carriers, etc). When developing a model we can choose different philosophies. We could for instance develop one robust model that requires the same level of detail for all data sources. The advantage is that the application of the model is relatively easy. The big disadvantage is that we will loose a lot of useful information since the model will be directed to the worst case of the available data sources. The other extreme is to develop a method for inclusion of each data source separately (NEAC database construction model). The advantage is that all information incorporated in the data sources can be used to the maximum. The disadvantage of this method is that it is very costly especially when many sources have to be considered and the reliability of transport flows may vary between different OD relations since some originate from observed data and others from estimation procedures. In the ETIS reference database model we have to take account of the fact that we will have to deal with quite a lot of data sources. We therefore have to look for an efficient top­down method that can make use of as much information in the sources as possible, but is not being held back by the poorest source. Each of the possible methods has its pros and cons. In any case it can be stated that only reliable information can be obtained from database construction if for all elements of the transport chain information is available. If this is not the case then some parts or elements of the database will be less reliable. Since different fragments of the total transport chain will be collected that have to be matched to each other it may be unsure whether the total constructed records will be reliable. In the INFOSTAT project (task 3 WP E) attempts have been made to include a second transhipment point in the record structure for flows of the European continent in relation with Norway. In this pilot case transhipment data was available for Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and France on the continent and in Norway. A method was developed to combine a transport chain database for the continent with a transport chain database for Norway. Unfortunately by that time no port to port information was available which could be used to match the Norwegian ports and the ports on the continent. As a result the link between the ports in the eventual database was not reliable. Analysing either of the transhipment points in relation with all other variables except the other transhipment point is reliable however. The advantage of the eventual database is that all figures 20 Document2 27 May 2004

D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL – FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND are consistent. In case the port to port data would have been available a multidimensional entropy method could have been applied to combine all sources. From this exercise we learned that combining sources is useful in any case to ensure consistency, but that the reliability is in the first place depending on availability of data for all elements of the chain. One of the main advantages of a top­down approach is that detail can be added to the database by inclusion of different sources on specific transhipment points or links without being held back by the non­availability of data on other transhipment points or links. A danger might be that in case the information for the construction of a transport chain is incomplete, like was the case in the example above, unreliable links can be included. In these cases it is important that these links can be identified in the database or that the main database can only be approached by trained experts and that sub­sets of the database constructed by aggregation of one or more variables will be available for a wider audience. 4.5 The top­down approach The philosophy of the “transport chain principle” implicates that the transport flows are determined by the trade flows; we preserve the trade relation and follow the route of the transported goods. This means that, besides the origin and destination, the location of transhipment and the modes before and after transhipment are included. To do this we use a topdown approach, which means that we take the rough country­to­country trade information and refine this, step by step, using the various national data sources. This approach allows us to introduce the most disaggregated level permitted by the data sources available in each individual country, without being limited by the lack of data in other countries. By constructing the database using the top­down approach, it is possible to use a restricted number of sources with a maximum of regional detail. Additionally it is possible to give different parts of the database a different level of detail without introducing inconsistencies. This method is being materialised in an approach in which four phases can be distinguished. The phases in the top­down approach are the following: 1. The building of a country­to­country matrix 2. Including transhipment regions on the basis of transhipment statistics 3. Regional division of country­to­country totals 4. Incorporating domestic transport These phases will be described in the following paragraphs. 4.5.1 Phase I The construction of a country­to­country matrix As a reference for the development of the database the EUROSTAT trade by mode (COMEXT) is used for the EU countries and national trade data sources for the other countries in the core area. In Document2 27 May 2004 21

<strong>D5</strong> <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>WP</strong> 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER<br />

MANUAL – FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND<br />

are consistent. In case the port to port data would have been available a multidimensional entropy<br />

method could have been applied to combine all sources.<br />

From this exercise we learned that combining sources is useful in any case to ensure consistency,<br />

but that the reliability is in the first place depending on availability of data for all elements of the<br />

chain.<br />

One of the main advantages of a top­down approach is that detail can be added to the database by<br />

inclusion of different sources on specific transhipment points or links without being held back by<br />

the non­availability of data on other transhipment points or links. A danger might be that in case the<br />

information for the construction of a transport chain is incomplete, like was the case in the example<br />

above, unreliable links can be included. In these cases it is important that these links can be<br />

identified in the database or that the main database can only be approached by trained experts and<br />

that sub­sets of the database constructed by aggregation of one or more variables will be available<br />

for a wider audience.<br />

4.5 The top­down approach<br />

The philosophy of the “transport chain principle” implicates that the transport flows are<br />

determined by the trade flows; we preserve the trade relation and follow the route of the<br />

transported goods. This means that, besides the origin and destination, the location of<br />

transhipment and the modes before and after transhipment are included. To do this we use a topdown<br />

approach, which means that we take the rough country­to­country trade information and<br />

refine this, step by step, using the various national data sources. This approach allows us to<br />

introduce the most disaggregated level permitted by the data sources available in each<br />

individual country, without being limited by the lack of data in other countries. By constructing<br />

the database using the top­down approach, it is possible to use a restricted number of sources with a<br />

maximum of regional detail. Additionally it is possible to give different parts of the database a<br />

different level of detail without introducing inconsistencies. This method is being materialised in an<br />

approach in which four phases can be distinguished.<br />

The phases in the top­down approach are the following:<br />

1. The building of a country­to­country matrix<br />

2. Including transhipment regions on the basis of transhipment statistics<br />

3. Regional division of country­to­country totals<br />

4. Incorporating domestic transport<br />

These phases will be described in the following paragraphs.<br />

4.5.1 Phase I The construction of a country­to­country matrix<br />

As a reference for the development of the database the EUROSTAT trade by mode (COMEXT) is<br />

used for the EU countries and national trade data sources for the other countries in the core area. In<br />

Document2<br />

27 May 2004<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!