16.05.2015 Views

D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus

D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus

D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>D5</strong> <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>WP</strong> 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL –<br />

FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND<br />

Solutions to these problems are outside the scope of this project and will therefore not be<br />

considered.<br />

The focus will be mainly on change of mode and where possible on entrepot. Transhipment as a<br />

result of change of mode is the best known principle. It is also the easiest to include in transport<br />

chain databases. Entrepot can also be seen as a transhipment action. The difference is the<br />

duration of the transhipment. It would be an added value to include entrepot in a transport chain<br />

structure to be able to preserve the relation between the real origin and the destination.<br />

Including change of mode and entrepot will give a much clearer view on the routes that the<br />

products follow.<br />

How to include Simultaneous Mode Use in the <strong>Database</strong>?<br />

In figure 5.1 it can be observed that a truck is transported from point C to point D by ship. The<br />

problem that arises in this case is that in fact two modes are being used: road and sea. According<br />

to the classical approach three possibilities exist:<br />

1. Register as road from B to E<br />

2. Register as road from B to C and as sea from C to D and in another record registration as sea<br />

from C to D and as road from D to E<br />

3. Independent registration of flow from B to C as road, C to D as sea and D to E as road<br />

If 1. is used we loose the information that part of the trip was over sea. If 2. is used we loose the<br />

information that the cargo was not transhipped but that the truck was also on the ship. In 3 like<br />

in number 1, the information what type of transhipment takes place is lost. So none of the<br />

possibilities can cope with this Ro ­ Ro situation and the chain structure. These problems can be<br />

solved by using the transport chain concept. Another problem that is solved by using transport<br />

chains is that no double countings can occur when analysing the data.<br />

The same problems of course occur in case a train is transported by ship or a truck is transported<br />

by train. All these possible combinations of modes transported by other modes as ‘simultaneous<br />

mode use’ are defined.<br />

The registration of simultaneous mode use can be solved in several ways:<br />

1. Introduce another mode name for the combination of modes<br />

2. Introduce another variable that indicates whether simultaneous mode use has taken place.<br />

Possibility 1. has as disadvantage that in case we want to know what is actively transported by<br />

ship we have to aggregate several modes.<br />

With possibility 2. this problem is solved. Besides with possibility 2. a strict distinction can be<br />

made between the active mode and the passive mode that is transported.<br />

156<br />

Document2<br />

27 May 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!