D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus
D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus
D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>D5</strong> <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>WP</strong> 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER<br />
MANUAL – FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND<br />
commodity combinations that did not match with any records in the MDSTransmodal lookup<br />
tables. For these, an iterative process was developed so that mode factors could be obtained<br />
from similar countries or similar commodities or both.<br />
Problems also arise from the inclusion of "Departements d'outremer" or "DOM", i.e. the West<br />
Indies as regions of France. Users of the database need to be aware that flows into these<br />
departements do not represent short sea shipping.<br />
The NUTS3 Departements were aggregated to NUTS2 Regions, reducing the total number of<br />
subnational zones from 100 (96 excluding DOM) to 21 mainland regions <strong>plus</strong> Corse,<br />
Guadeloupe, Martinique, Guyane, and Reunion.<br />
· Spain<br />
The situation regarding Spain is somewhat similar to France. Again, the source was a Customs<br />
& Excise database, containing regional detail for 50 zones in Spain ("Provincias"). This is<br />
equivalent to NUTS3. The database was dispatched on seven magnetic tapes, and amounted to<br />
over 700 megabytes of data.<br />
A database program was developed by MDSTransmodal to read the files extracted from the<br />
tapes, and to compress the data by lifting out the key fields of data. The commodity<br />
classification system used was the standard 8 digit Harmonised System, as used within Comext<br />
as well as the majority of countries worldwide. Again, correlation tables were used to convert<br />
this to 2 digit SITC.<br />
Country codes were again based on the standard Eurostat practice.<br />
As before, the estimated unitised/nonunitised split was introduced, using the factors already<br />
calculated by MDSTransmodal at the national level.<br />
The main problem has been the need to compress vast quantities of data to a few megabytes,<br />
and the relative unreliabity of using tapes as a storage media. As with the French database,<br />
offshore regions such as the Canarias, Baleares, Ceuta and Melilla have required special<br />
treatment.<br />
The 52 NUTS3 Provincias (including Ceuta and Melilla) have been aggregated to 15 mainland<br />
NUTS2 Communidades Autonomas <strong>plus</strong> Baleares, Canarias, and CeutayMelilla.<br />
· The UK<br />
The UK experience is somewhat different to Spain and France. UK trade statistics have never<br />
recorded regional data such as UK country of origin or destination. The main source of regional<br />
data has been the Origin and Destination of International Transport (ODIT) survey, carried out<br />
by the UK's Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). This is based<br />
upon a sampling technique, and is only carried out every five years (1986, 1991, 1996).<br />
Document2<br />
27 May 2004<br />
137