D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus

D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus D5 Annex report WP 3: ETIS Database methodology ... - ETIS plus

16.05.2015 Views

D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL – FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND To take advantage of the different areas of specialisation between the team members, the work has been sub­divided. MDS­Transmodal were responsible for obtaining and processing data from: · France · Spain, and · The United Kingdom In addition, MDS­Transmodal was required to produce a database of country­countrycommodity totals based on the Eurostat Comext (Trade Statistics) database. The database was enhanced by the estimation of the unitised/non­unitised split for each trade flow. This is fundamental for understanding the demand for specific types of transport e.g. trailers, containers, general cargo, liquid bulk, dry bulk etc. Finally, MDS­Transmodal was supplied with a German regional database, which was combined with the regional data from the other listed countries to produce a region­region matrix covering France, Spain, the UK and Germany. Data Collection The success of this project depends to large extent on the type of data readily available from the member states. Although it is technically possible to construct synthetic matrices purely on the basis of measures of economic activity within specific regions, the probability of error is severe. It is therefore critical to be able to analyse trip end totals at a regional level. This provides the necessary input for understanding which industries are located where, and their relative importance. For all three countries within the MDS­Transmodal remit, regional data has been successfully obtained. · France The French source is the DNSCE (Customs and Excise) database of external trade. This conveniently classifies trade movements by country of origin/destination, commodity (NST), French Department (NUTS3), and volume (weight and value). The data used within this study is for 1997 full year, and is essentially a complete record of regional imports and exports. The data was processed to remove superfluous data fields, and to compress the commodity definition from NST­4 Digit to SITC­2Digit, using a standard correlation table. The country codes were the EC standard Comext codes. The main addition was therefore to convert the total tonnes (as given) into unitised and nonunitised tonnes, using look­up tables detailed for each partner country and commodity, derived from MDS­Transmodal's trade data archive. The main problem was to deal with country and 136 Document2 27 May 2004

D5 Annex WP 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL – FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND commodity combinations that did not match with any records in the MDS­Transmodal look­up tables. For these, an iterative process was developed so that mode factors could be obtained from similar countries or similar commodities or both. Problems also arise from the inclusion of "Departements d'outre­mer" or "DOM", i.e. the West Indies as regions of France. Users of the database need to be aware that flows into these departements do not represent short sea shipping. The NUTS3 Departements were aggregated to NUTS2 Regions, reducing the total number of sub­national zones from 100 (96 excluding DOM) to 21 mainland regions plus Corse, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Guyane, and Reunion. · Spain The situation regarding Spain is somewhat similar to France. Again, the source was a Customs & Excise database, containing regional detail for 50 zones in Spain ("Provincias"). This is equivalent to NUTS3. The database was dispatched on seven magnetic tapes, and amounted to over 700 megabytes of data. A database program was developed by MDS­Transmodal to read the files extracted from the tapes, and to compress the data by lifting out the key fields of data. The commodity classification system used was the standard 8 digit Harmonised System, as used within Comext as well as the majority of countries worldwide. Again, correlation tables were used to convert this to 2 digit SITC. Country codes were again based on the standard Eurostat practice. As before, the estimated unitised/non­unitised split was introduced, using the factors already calculated by MDS­Transmodal at the national level. The main problem has been the need to compress vast quantities of data to a few megabytes, and the relative unreliabity of using tapes as a storage media. As with the French database, offshore regions such as the Canarias, Baleares, Ceuta and Melilla have required special treatment. The 52 NUTS3 Provincias (including Ceuta and Melilla) have been aggregated to 15 mainland NUTS2 Communidades Autonomas plus Baleares, Canarias, and Ceuta­y­Melilla. · The UK The UK experience is somewhat different to Spain and France. UK trade statistics have never recorded regional data such as UK country of origin or destination. The main source of regional data has been the Origin and Destination of International Transport (ODIT) survey, carried out by the UK's Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). This is based upon a sampling technique, and is only carried out every five years (1986, 1991, 1996). Document2 27 May 2004 137

<strong>D5</strong> <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>WP</strong> 3: DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL –<br />

FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND<br />

To take advantage of the different areas of specialisation between the team members, the work<br />

has been sub­divided. MDS­Transmodal were responsible for obtaining and processing data<br />

from:<br />

· France<br />

· Spain, and<br />

· The United Kingdom<br />

In addition, MDS­Transmodal was required to produce a database of country­countrycommodity<br />

totals based on the Eurostat Comext (Trade Statistics) database. The database was<br />

enhanced by the estimation of the unitised/non­unitised split for each trade flow. This is<br />

fundamental for understanding the demand for specific types of transport e.g. trailers,<br />

containers, general cargo, liquid bulk, dry bulk etc.<br />

Finally, MDS­Transmodal was supplied with a German regional database, which was combined<br />

with the regional data from the other listed countries to produce a region­region matrix covering<br />

France, Spain, the UK and Germany.<br />

Data Collection<br />

The success of this project depends to large extent on the type of data readily available from the<br />

member states. Although it is technically possible to construct synthetic matrices purely on the<br />

basis of measures of economic activity within specific regions, the probability of error is severe.<br />

It is therefore critical to be able to analyse trip end totals at a regional level. This provides the<br />

necessary input for understanding which industries are located where, and their relative<br />

importance.<br />

For all three countries within the MDS­Transmodal remit, regional data has been successfully<br />

obtained.<br />

· France<br />

The French source is the DNSCE (Customs and Excise) database of external trade. This<br />

conveniently classifies trade movements by country of origin/destination, commodity (NST),<br />

French Department (NUTS3), and volume (weight and value). The data used within this study<br />

is for 1997 full year, and is essentially a complete record of regional imports and exports.<br />

The data was processed to remove superfluous data fields, and to compress the commodity<br />

definition from NST­4 Digit to SITC­2Digit, using a standard correlation table. The country<br />

codes were the EC standard Comext codes.<br />

The main addition was therefore to convert the total tonnes (as given) into unitised and nonunitised<br />

tonnes, using look­up tables detailed for each partner country and commodity, derived<br />

from MDS­Transmodal's trade data archive. The main problem was to deal with country and<br />

136<br />

Document2<br />

27 May 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!