15.05.2015 Views

D5 Annex report WP 4 - ETIS plus

D5 Annex report WP 4 - ETIS plus

D5 Annex report WP 4 - ETIS plus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>D5</strong> <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>WP</strong> 4: <strong>ETIS</strong> DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER<br />

MANUAL – PASSENGER DEMAND<br />

4.7.3 Trip motive­related constraints<br />

Due to the increasing degree of model detail (three considered trip purposes) some remarks are<br />

necessary concerning the quality of data in these segments. While the transport flows for the<br />

business are sufficient (as the general structure is captured by the current model specifications),<br />

the models for holiday and private travel patterns need further improvements.<br />

The private travellers are quite good captured by surveys in the northern countries while the<br />

southern are lacking such information. The same holds for the holiday trips. The behaviour of<br />

holidaymakers is very complex and might not be covered by a single overall model for all kinds<br />

of holidays or individuals. Unfortunately, detailed surveys focusing on this trip purpose are<br />

seldom available. Very little is known about the differences between the holiday habits in<br />

different European countries and the driving forces behind them. Only some sociological<br />

research and statistical figures can give some hints about general patterns and preferences.<br />

While strong indications are given that the number of holiday trips is correlated with the<br />

individuals’ standard of living, modelling the choice where individuals spend the holidays is<br />

much more complicated. We know e.g. that the preference of people living in Northern and<br />

Southern Europe to stay in their own country is higher than generally in the remaining parts of<br />

Europe. We are aware that e.g. common language might be a factor influencing the destination<br />

choice but the data available is not complete enough to prove such theories in detail.<br />

Additionally one of the main driving forces in this field could not be considered – the supply of<br />

package tours and the corresponding expenditures. This factor plays an important role in this<br />

field and the recent years, the trend towards increasing numbers of last­minute offers (including<br />

scheduled as well as non­scheduled flights) and individual offers via internet intensified the<br />

uncertainties in the consumers’ destination choice.<br />

To be able to consider specific information that are available for e.g. certain relations, these<br />

corrections have to be merged into the base year matrix as the models are not able to be adjusted<br />

for any specific relation. Hence, for modelling future developments the corrected matrices have<br />

to be forecasted by using a pivot approach that considers the level of the underlying patterns. In<br />

consequence the first aim is to reach correct information about the total passenger volume.<br />

Afterwards one can concentrate on trip purpose specific items step by step, e.g. starting with<br />

separating business and non­business trips and so on.<br />

4.8 The use of DATELINE for the calibration of the OD matrix<br />

Due to the data collection guidelines a lot of data will already be harmonised to some extent.<br />

Nevertheless the different sources have to be analysed at their intersections to allow for a<br />

consistent treatment within one matrix. Simple logic like as many passengers must leave a<br />

country as they will enter at the bordering country etc. has already been mentioned above and<br />

their treatment was stated.<br />

Document3<br />

27 May 2004 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!