D5 Annex report WP 4 - ETIS plus
D5 Annex report WP 4 - ETIS plus
D5 Annex report WP 4 - ETIS plus
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>D5</strong> <strong>Annex</strong> <strong>WP</strong> 4: <strong>ETIS</strong> DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER<br />
MANUAL – PASSENGER DEMAND<br />
While detailed information of the last bullet point of the above is not available neither on<br />
European nor on national level, the disaggregated model approach (and its results) has to be<br />
considered as appropriate in general. A better indication of the quality of data could be obtained<br />
from the comparison of aggregated model output with available statistics as well as results<br />
coming from other models/ projects.<br />
The Figure 42 shows the general structure of the iterative procedure that was undertaken to<br />
adjust the computed matrices to statistics and traffic counts. The iterative process starts with the<br />
generation and distribution stages. Their results are compared with basic statistics and (sub)<br />
matrices collected in the first project stages. The findings of these evaluations affect the<br />
adjustments of the models involved. Basic adjustments are related to the model parameters and<br />
correct e.g. the shape of the trip distance distributions. This is done by varying the influence of<br />
distance measures on the model results. Additionally we apply dummy variable to consider<br />
‘barriers’ like national borders. Dummy variables are model components that possess the value<br />
‘1’ if a certain condition is true and the value ‘0’ is it is wrong. This kind of model ‘switch’<br />
allows adding specific information to the model under welldefined conditions.<br />
If an improved fit is no longer possible by model parameter calibration, the uncovered effects<br />
are captured by constraints in a set of additional matrices. These matrices contain upper and/or<br />
lower limits of transport flows corresponding to observed figures.<br />
We named these structures ‘bounding matrices’ as they bound the base year flows to a welldefined<br />
interval. The bounding matrices could generally cover all information that have not to<br />
be modelled necessarily as appropriate observations are available. The combination of observed<br />
information and modelled data fills the remaining gaps in the travel patterns and allows the<br />
prediction of future situations. The matrix generation process considers these bounds while<br />
setting up the distribution stage. For details see the corresponding section below.<br />
22<br />
Document3<br />
27 May 2004