D5 Annex report WP 4 - ETIS plus

More documents

Recommendations

Info

D5 Annex WP 4: ETIS DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL – PASSENGER DEMAND The passenger transport matrix will then have the following structure: · Origin · Destination · Passenger by trip purpose and main mode For these variables the characteristic will be considered as listed in Table 32. Table 3.2 Variables to be included in the passenger OD matrix Core countries PanEuropean scope Intercontinental scope Regional detail Modes Trip purpose Other Typologies Measuring units Base year EU15, Norway, Switzerland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Hungary, Slovenia, Malta, Cyprus. Rumania, Bulgaria, Turkey, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia & Montenegro, Albania, FYRO Macedonia Africa, America, Asia, Oceanic NUTS 2 for the core countries, Nuts 0 for the PanEuropean scope and per geographic group for the intercontinental destinations (contracted, but see remarks below). Air, Road, Rail, Ferries are allocated to the main modes. Business and nonbusiness when modelling based on Dateline data is valid. Vehicle/vessel types (definition depending on data availability) Persons Personkm Number of vehicles/vessels Vehiclekm 2000 and according to the Eurostat rule as close as possible to this reference year. Concerning the regional detail it can be remarked that NUTS 2 can only be achieved where the data availability allows. In many cases estimation models can be applied requiring more aggregate regional data and/or socioeconomic data. In the remaining cases the country level will be used. Where possible a lower NUTS level is used for modelling as well as to fill gaps. The results presented in the passenger matrix will always be one level higher than modelled to ensure a maximum coverage of the interregional trips. People living close to a regions border are likely to cross more often the boundaries by undertaking a short trip. Therefore most NUTS3 border crossing trips are not relevant for a NUTS2.matrix, when not covering internal NUTS2 flows. In addition to the deliverables contracted we will try to provide intra NUTS2 flows (meaning the diagonal of a NUT2matrix), which base on the passenger flows between those NUTS3 12 Document3 27 May 2004
D5 Annex WP 4: ETIS DATABASE METHODOLOGY AND DATABASE USER MANUAL – PASSENGER DEMAND regions belonging to an NUTS2region. But it has to be stated, that these intra NUTS2flows not necessarily will be of the same quality than the other parts of the NUTS2matrix. The feedback expected from the output of the testing phase (see section 4.9) in phase 3 will have serious impact on that. It is foreseen that the matrix structure for the 28 core countries will be on NUTS 2 level while the 8 countries of PanEuropean scope will be aggregated to NUTS 0 level. A further effort which also reaches far out of the contracted regionalisation following the clients needs which were raised during the course of the project, will be undertaken to make passenger flows available on a NUTS3level: Starting from the NUTS2matrix including the diagonal as stated above, we will check, whether it is valid to produce a NUTS3 modelbased flow distribution on top of the sampled NUTS2 flow matrix. This means an artificial split of those flows on the NUTS3level, which bases completely on modelling using flow proportions available from the STAC project. The Intercontinental scope concerns mostly the aviation and will be reflected by the regions hosting airports which offer intercontinental services. This approach was selected as no information is available about transfer passengers and the routes chosen by the passengers. In addition the land based access and egress to respectively from airports is already incorporated in the link counts of the land based modes. Besides the OD matrix only aggregate figures are needed as can be concluded from the indicator descriptions. Due to the complexity of the construction of the ODmatrix it is only possible to develop a base year OD matrix. For the main modes aggregate time series data will be looked for. The time series proposed is 1995 – 2002. Once such a transport matrix has been developed it is possible to extract more specific subdatabases from it. Here are some examples listed. Trip purpose matrices: · Origin · Destination · Passenger by trip purpose Main mode matrices: · Origin · Destination · Passenger by main mode Document3 27 May 2004 13
Page 1: D5 Annex report WP 4: : ETISDatab
Page 4 and 5: D5 Annex WP 4: ETIS DATABASE METHOD
Page 11: D5 Annex WP 4: ETIS DATABASE METHOD
Page 51: D5 Annex WP 4: ETIS DATABASE METHOD
Page 63:
ANNEX A DESCRIPTION OF INDICATORS C
Page 67:
ANNEX B DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORTING I
Page 71 and 72:
ANNEX C INDICATOR COMPILATION TEMPL
Page 73 and 74:
D5 Annex WP 4: ETIS DATABASE METHOD
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
ANNEX D EUROSTAT NEW CRONOS TABLES
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121:
ANNEX E PASSENGER FLOWS FRANCE - TE
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 157:
ANNEX F OBSERVED ODDATELINE MATRI
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162:
show all

D5 Annex report WP 4 - ETIS plus

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?