EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL A PROPOSAL DOCUMENT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Option 3 Capital Investment - based on estimated capital contribution payable by East Ayrshire Council for construction of a new secondary school on ground at the former Diageo site (estimated total construction cost of £34.055m, less assumed SFT contribution of £17.500m and after allowing for £1.500m of development / advisory fees payable upfront) and the construction of a new primary school on an as yet to be identified site (estimated present day cost of £8.750m). Please note that overall construction costs allow for the demolition of existing facilities at Kilmarnock and James Hamilton Academies (estimated present day cost of £1.834m). It should be noted that capital cost estimates for new build have been prepared without specific design or specification and are for comparative purposes only. Estimate also includes whole life costs associated with maintenance of a new build / refurbished property based on known costs for similar sized facility (estimated present day cost of £5.282m). Given the commercial sensitivity of the Heads of Terms Agreement between Diageo Scotland Limited and a third party it is noted that the site will be transferred by the site owner to the Council free of financial gain to the party so transferring the title. Accordingly, the acquisition cost to the Council is considered to be negligible. . Assumed capital receipt from Kilmarnock Academy and James Hamilton Academy sites of £3.980m; anticipated to be received 5 years after project completed. Revenue Impact - additional transport costs to transfer pupils to new school (present day annual cost £0.058m) assuming a start in August 2016 and an annual inflationary increase of 1%. Recurring revenue savings assumed in relation to employee costs (teaching) and administrative support, school fixed costs, catering, janitorial / cleaning, utility costs and supplies and services (total present day saving £1.100m). Assumption is that there will be no reduction in GAE and consequently AEF as a result of this option going ahead. Option 4 Capital Investment - based on estimated capital contribution payable by East Ayrshire Council on completion of the project; estimated total construction cost of £36.684m, less assumed SFT contribution of £17.500m for the Secondary School and £1.500m for the Primary School elements and after allowing for £1.500m of development / advisory fees payable upfront. Please note that overall construction costs allow for the demolition of existing facilities at Kilmarnock James Hamilton Academies and Silverwood Primary School (estimated present day cost of £2.335m). It should be noted that capital cost estimates for new build have been prepared without specific design or specification and are for comparative purposes only. Estimate also includes whole life costs associated with maintenance of a new build / refurbished property based on known costs for similar sized facility (estimated present day cost of £6.029m). Assumed capital receipt from Kilmarnock Academy, and SIlverwood Primary sites of £1.988m; anticipated to be received 5 years after project completed. Revenue Impact - additional transport costs to transfer pupils to new school (present day annual cost £0.158m) assuming a start in August 2016 and an annual inflationary increase of 1%. Recurring revenue savings assumed in relation to employee costs (teaching) and administrative support, school fixed costs, catering, janitorial / cleaning, utility costs and supplies and services (total present day saving £1.100m). Assumption is that there will be no reduction in GAE and consequently AEF as a result of this option going ahead. 80
APPENDIX 8C Options OPTION APPRAISAL SCORING MATRIX – NON FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT Service Business Partnership Risk Condition Suitability Sustainability Site Delivery Efficiency Availability DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT TOTAL SCORE Ground Conditions / Environment Planning Issues Size / Layout Traffic Impact Buildability 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 5 5 4 5 3 5 45.00 Option 1: Do Nothing Option 2: 7 8 8 8 10 10 8 5 4 4 5 4 4 85.00 New Secondary on JHA site Option 3: 9 8 10 5 10 10 8 3 3 2 4 3 3 78.00 New Secondary on Diageo site Option 4: 3- 10 10 10 9 10 10 10 5 4 4 5 4 4 95.00 18 Campus on JHA site Max Score 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 Max Section 40 30 30 Score Key: The matrix table reflects the initial analysis and investigations of the different options. The viability of each option is reflected in its relative score (the higher the score the more viable the option). Option 1 Strategic Assessment Service Delivery : fails to address under occupancy, energy inefficiency, building condition or suitability to deliver a modern curriculum, does not deliver any improvement in pupil transition arrangements or the strategic needs of the Education Service. Business Efficiency : does not add to business efficiency by improving building conditions or suitability or create an improvement in service delivery. Partnership : this option does not facilitate close partnership working between schools, except those already achieved through the co-location of James Hamilton Academy and New Farm Primary School, there is no reshaping of education 81
Page 1 and 2:
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF
Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARY OF PROCESS FOR THIS PROPOSA
Page 5 and 6:
Note on Corrections If any inaccura
Page 7 and 8:
8. Education provision at New Farm
Page 9 and 10:
Curriculum for Excellence aims to e
Page 11 and 12:
(b) School Estate Suitability and C
Page 13 and 14:
(d) Scottish Schools for the Future
Page 15 and 16:
8. Education provision at New Farm
Page 17 and 18:
B : Satisfactory C : Poor D : Bad P
Page 19 and 20:
Ayrshire and Arran, the Planning Se
Page 21 and 22:
Kilmarnock Tae Kwon Do Club 7 - FC
Page 23 and 24:
Front elevation from Elmbank Drive
Page 25 and 26:
The projected pupil rolls for Kilma
Page 27 and 28:
Council’s intention that the spec
Page 29 and 30: delivery of activities that are nee
Page 31 and 32: ‣ The supportive learning environ
Page 33 and 34: Table 13: School Condition and Suit
Page 35 and 36: General Registers of Scotland and i
Page 37 and 38: (ii) A secondary school with a capa
Page 39 and 40: however there are playingfields on
Page 41 and 42: Kilmarnock Academy is relatively we
Page 43 and 44: major hazard site when Diageo were
Page 45 and 46: xii. xiii. Cost Attached at Appendi
Page 47 and 48: The BGS web site has three borehole
Page 49 and 50: with the lowest receiving 10, and a
Page 51 and 52: iv. This proposal will have a posit
Page 53 and 54: wind and water tight. This will fre
Page 55 and 56: There are huge opportunities for th
Page 57 and 58: vii. viii. ix. The benefits for all
Page 59 and 60: Table 16: Results of the Options Ap
Page 61 and 62: (b) Kilmarnock Academy Kilmarnock A
Page 63 and 64: External Organisation (ALEO), and a
Page 65 and 66: 9.3 Revenue Costs (a) Tables 18 and
Page 67 and 68: 9.4 Assumptions In calculating the
Page 69 and 70: ‣The former Diageo site on Hill S
Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX 1 JAMES HAMILTON ACADEMY -
Page 73 and 74: APPENDIX 3 KILMARNOCK ACADEMY - CAT
Page 75 and 76: APPENDIX 5 SILVERWOOD PRIMARY SCHOO
Page 77 and 78: ORIGINAL MASTERPLAN FOR THE FORMER
Page 79: APPENDIX 8B OPTION APPRAISAL SCORIN
Page 83 and 84: facility would meet Educational req
Page 85 and 86: Development Assessment Site Availab
Page 87 and 88: This part of the form must be compl
show all

EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL A PROPOSAL DOCUMENT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?