EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL A PROPOSAL DOCUMENT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OPTION APPRAISAL SCORING MATRIX - SUMMARY APPENDIX 8A OPTION APPRAISAL – TOTAL SCORES WEIGHTING OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4 FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT £,000s £,000s £,000s £,000s 1 NPV of each Option £18,224 £10,194 £8,796 £7,132 2 NPV transposed into points 50% 39.14 69.96 81.08 100.00 NON FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT 3 Non financial assessment 50% 45.00 85.00 78.00 95.00 TOTAL POINTS SCORED 42.07 77.48 79.54 97.50 RESULT 4 3 2 1 Option 1: Do nothing (status quo) Option 2: New Secondary School on existing James Hamilton Academy site Option 3: New Secondary School on former Diageo Site, Hill Street, Kilmarnock Option 4: New 3- 78
APPENDIX 8B OPTION APPRAISAL SCORING MATRIX – FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT NPV OPTIONS OPTION NPV SCORE (£,000s) Option 1: Do nothing (status quo) £18,224 39.14 Option 2: New Secondary School on existing James Hamilton Academy site £10,194 69.96 Option 3: New Secondary School on former Diageo Site, Hill Street, Kilmarnock £8,796 81.08 Option 4: New 3-18 campus on existing James Hamilton Academy site £7,132 100.00 Option 1 Capital Investment - based on whole life maintenance costs for Kilmarnock and James Hamilton Academies as determined from recent condition surveys completed by external consultants (estimated at a present day cost of £13.409m). Also includes allowance for most immediate elemental replacement works over initial 2 year period to major elements such as roofs, windows, electrical, externals, toilets etc to bring these up to suitable condition as determined by external consultants (estimated present day cost of £4.815m). Revenue Impact - no significant revenue costs / savings in relation to baseline position. Option 2 Capital Investment - based on estimated capital contribution payable by East Ayrshire Council for construction of a new secondary school on ground at James Hamilton Academy (estimated total construction cost of £31.064m, less assumed SFT contribution of £17.500m and after allowing for £1.500m of development / advisory fees payable upfront) and the construction of a new primary school on an as yet to be identified site (estimated present day cost of £8.750m). Please note that overall construction costs allow for the demolition of existing facilities at Kilmarnock and James Hamilton Academies (estimated present day cost of £1.834m). It should be noted that capital cost estimates for new build have been prepared without specific design or specification and are for comparative purposes only. Estimate also includes whole life costs associated with maintenance of a new build / refurbished property based on known costs for similar sized facility (estimated present day cost of £5.282m). Assumed capital receipt from Kilmarnock Academy site of £0.980m; anticipated to be received 5 years after project completed. Revenue Impact - additional transport costs to transfer pupils to new school (present day annual cost £0.158m) assuming a start in August 2016 and an annual inflationary increase of 1%. Recurring revenue savings assumed in relation to employee costs (teaching) and administrative support, school fixed costs, catering, janitorial / cleaning, utility costs and supplies and services (total present day saving £1.100m). Assumption is that there will be no reduction in GAE and consequently AEF as a result of this option going ahead. 79
Page 1 and 2:
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF
Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARY OF PROCESS FOR THIS PROPOSA
Page 5 and 6:
Note on Corrections If any inaccura
Page 7 and 8:
8. Education provision at New Farm
Page 9 and 10:
Curriculum for Excellence aims to e
Page 11 and 12:
(b) School Estate Suitability and C
Page 13 and 14:
(d) Scottish Schools for the Future
Page 15 and 16:
8. Education provision at New Farm
Page 17 and 18:
B : Satisfactory C : Poor D : Bad P
Page 19 and 20:
Ayrshire and Arran, the Planning Se
Page 21 and 22:
Kilmarnock Tae Kwon Do Club 7 - FC
Page 23 and 24:
Front elevation from Elmbank Drive
Page 25 and 26:
The projected pupil rolls for Kilma
Page 27 and 28: Council’s intention that the spec
Page 29 and 30: delivery of activities that are nee
Page 31 and 32: ‣ The supportive learning environ
Page 33 and 34: Table 13: School Condition and Suit
Page 35 and 36: General Registers of Scotland and i
Page 37 and 38: (ii) A secondary school with a capa
Page 39 and 40: however there are playingfields on
Page 41 and 42: Kilmarnock Academy is relatively we
Page 43 and 44: major hazard site when Diageo were
Page 45 and 46: xii. xiii. Cost Attached at Appendi
Page 47 and 48: The BGS web site has three borehole
Page 49 and 50: with the lowest receiving 10, and a
Page 51 and 52: iv. This proposal will have a posit
Page 53 and 54: wind and water tight. This will fre
Page 55 and 56: There are huge opportunities for th
Page 57 and 58: vii. viii. ix. The benefits for all
Page 59 and 60: Table 16: Results of the Options Ap
Page 61 and 62: (b) Kilmarnock Academy Kilmarnock A
Page 63 and 64: External Organisation (ALEO), and a
Page 65 and 66: 9.3 Revenue Costs (a) Tables 18 and
Page 67 and 68: 9.4 Assumptions In calculating the
Page 69 and 70: ‣The former Diageo site on Hill S
Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX 1 JAMES HAMILTON ACADEMY -
Page 73 and 74: APPENDIX 3 KILMARNOCK ACADEMY - CAT
Page 75 and 76: APPENDIX 5 SILVERWOOD PRIMARY SCHOO
Page 77: ORIGINAL MASTERPLAN FOR THE FORMER
Page 81 and 82: APPENDIX 8C Options OPTION APPRAISA
Page 83 and 84: facility would meet Educational req
Page 85 and 86: Development Assessment Site Availab
Page 87 and 88: This part of the form must be compl
show all

EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL A PROPOSAL DOCUMENT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?