Mangalmandir - Maruti Edition (PDF) - Sai Kirtan Group
Mangalmandir - Maruti Edition (PDF) - Sai Kirtan Group Mangalmandir - Maruti Edition (PDF) - Sai Kirtan Group
chanting. Kapivar‘s contrivance was in ―rupam dehi‖ in which the ―e‖ maatraa was requested by him – so it so happened that: ―Rupam dahi, jayam dahi, yasho daho, dvisho jahi‖ meaning that wishing for his resolve accomplishment may our yajmaan (organiser) Raavan‘s form be burned, his victory turn to ashes, his fame be burned, and his opponents be burned. So by Hanumaanji‘s obtaining just one maatraa, the whole Laksha-Chandi operation turned adverse by the fault of mis pronunciation and instead of giving Raavan victory, destruction was granted – what contrivance of Kapivar! When Raavan came to know this, he began to maim the brahmins with his mace. Whereupon the noble like Vibhishan etc. said to him: ―Even Bhagvati Shakti by mispronunciation through the brahmins is turning to oppose your accomplishmnent of resolution. Please believe and refrain. There is still time.‖ ―But paying no attention and flouting the words of advise of his brother Vibhishan, Raavan became convinced that the monkey who in return for his service asked only for one maatraa was no ordinary person – that Hanumaan was no ordinary monkey but a great intellectual grammatarian and knower of tantra and mantra. Raavan was set back and by the contrivance of Kapivar, Sitaa I obtained you.‖ Sitaaji asked Raam for next morning to grant a boon to Hanumaanji according to his wishes for his assistance. And as if the moon was bearing witness it shed cool rays and hiding behind the clouds watched the sweet company of Sri Raam Sitaa. Though he was cursed with deterioration of his brilliance, he had not given up his act of the play act of prakruti and purusha. Sri Raam related Kapivar‘s contrivance to Sitaa – was it not heard by any other apart from the moon? Astu. The great intellectual Hanumaan Author : rev. Swaami Sri Sachchidaanandji Was Hanumaanji a monkey or human? In reply to that question Swaamiji presents his view. In a book published by Sastu Saahitya Vardhak Kaaryaalay ―Mahaabhaarat vishe ketlaak vichaaro ane suchanaao‖ has an article ―Hanumaan and his associates were humans but not monkeys with tails‖ the essential facts within which are that Hanumaanji was very well versed with Rug-ved, Yajur-ved, Saaam-ved and grammar faculty. Such a great intellectual, who can call such individual a monkey? In this God‘s creation can one see any rule by which one can draw inference that the race of monkeys could behold wisdom of the Vedas? So, it can be concluded that Hanumaanji and Sugriva and others who were the beholders of the knowledge of Vedas were not tailed monkeys. For example, just a little time ago when the war took place between Russia and Japan, noticing the jumping of the Japanese the Russians inferred them as Yellow monkeys (many Japanese are yellow in complexion). That is how this reference became established for the Japanese. And it alo came to used as such. Also even today many Europeans and other countries refer to the Russians as bears. And for the British as the British lions or John Bull. And take the example of our Bhaarat. Warriors of the Naag dynasty (Naag-vanshi) are famed, whose descendants of Chhotaa-nag-pur etc. Mahaarajas pride themselves with the title of ―Naag‖ (serpent). So were they really serpents? Not so, they beheld the lustre of warriors so their dynasty became known as ―Naag‖. Similarly, there is no doubt that Sugriva and his other associates and aids became known as monkeys. Observe, even to this day many 62 | P a g e
statues of Hanumaanji‘s face have moustache bent at the ends – so has anyone seen such moustaches on the faces of the monkeys? Yes, humans do have them. What do these moustaches suggest? It is worth thinking over. Not observing the essential foundation of Maharshi Vaalmik, just as the story telling of the Puraans began in Bhaarat, so did the stories of hanumaan and Sugriva etc, spread out. Think over, can it happen for there to be a kingdom of the monkeys? In Ramaayan there is description of Kishkindhaa, a wealthy kingdom similar to those of the humans. In which case how can the residents and statesmen administrators of that kingdom be believed to be monkeys? Yes, in the construction of poetic verses some names may get attached to their synonym. By above facts, it becomes apparent that Hanumaan etc. were not tailed monkeys. But they were humans. Hunumaan was a great intellectual, in that subject thee is a prevalent example. Once in Bhagwaan Raam‘s court, the mind knower (antaryaami) Ramchandraji observed the mind set of members that Hanumaan was a servant / guard sitting constantly at the feet of Raamchandraji. He cannot be included in the class of intellectuals. Observing this neglect / disrespect of Hanumaan, Bhagwaan could not tolerate it. So to expose the intellectual brilliance of his devotee, suddenly in the full court he asked Hanumaanji a question – who are you? Hearing the question, Hanumaanji was astonished – does not my sweet Lord not know me? Surely it seems this question is being asked with an intent to the one who is ever present at his sanctified holy feet. So this could not remain hidden from intellectual Hanumaan. Immediately with clasped hands standing up within the ear shot of all courtiers in clear and full of intellectual words he couteously said: By the consciousness of the gross body, I am your servant – you are my dear as life Lord In practical terms I am part of you the resident in all - In mind set of individual being From the angle of the aatma, I – you is that only one From the vision of the Bhrahm, I am not nor are you In the inexpressible, how can exist you and me? By such reply there was a great surprise in the court. Hanumaanji got accounted amongst the best knowledgeable and intellectuals. By this example it becomes clear that hanumaanji was great knowledgeable intellectual, who can say that such spiritual knowledge exists in monkey with tail?. So by this it becomes very apparent Hanumaan was a human. In Muktikopnishad, Sri Raamchandraji in peaching to Hanumaanji says: Vasanaam sam-parityajya mayi chin-maatra vigrahe | Yas-tishatathi gata-sneha-ha soham sach-chit-sukhaatma-ka-ha || Darshan-a-darshane hitwaa svayam keval roopa-ta-ha | Ya aaste kapi-shaardul bhrahm sa bhrahm-chitta svayam || Meaning: Those beings renouncing all attachments meaning giving up all affection to anything and stabilising the ―I‖ (ego) on the pure consciuosness considers just me as his form – that being transcends to become my sat-chit-aanand truth-consciousness-bliss form. And O greatest Kapi Hanuman. Any being forsaking my visible aqnd invisible and 63 | P a g e
- Page 11 and 12: The cart was made to travel in the
- Page 13 and 14: But they were no match to the stren
- Page 15 and 16: ―What can I do?‖, said the Saad
- Page 17 and 18: Raam kaaju kinhem binu, mohi kahaam
- Page 19 and 20: today‘s chanters of Raam cannot s
- Page 21 and 22: them, the child fell off the plane
- Page 23 and 24: command of the chief, the police re
- Page 25 and 26: made for the great journey of samaa
- Page 27 and 28: During the uprising of 1857, he was
- Page 29 and 30: prasut samay Kausalyes ||151 || Kav
- Page 31 and 32: Raam was ashamed of himself Red wit
- Page 33 and 34: Observing the Maharshi sad, sri Han
- Page 35 and 36: detail and Shaah listening to it be
- Page 37 and 38: ―You speak true. You become Valir
- Page 39 and 40: ―What is that condition?‖ ―
- Page 41 and 42: Lord Sri Raamji‘s command had bee
- Page 43 and 44: Just as the chat was proceeding thu
- Page 45 and 46: Saluting at the feet of the pair of
- Page 47 and 48: I am going now. May the grace of Sh
- Page 49 and 50: Sugriv - was really incarnation of
- Page 51 and 52: That impenetrable bodied Hanumaan -
- Page 53 and 54: ―Why are you not answering? Never
- Page 55 and 56: ―But if you will not go further o
- Page 57 and 58: Sri hnaumaanji was from the race of
- Page 59 and 60: twenty four hours and also keeping
- Page 61: Kapivar’s contrivance Author: Poe
- Page 65 and 66: The beings in the category of ―Ja
- Page 67 and 68: Yadi vaa tva-eka-patni-tvam shito b
- Page 69 and 70: And sanctifying the status of messe
- Page 71 and 72: In these thoughts the moments const
- Page 73 and 74: Hanumaan apart from being a great w
- Page 75 and 76: make him better, similarly these in
- Page 77 and 78: By: Sri Kaalidaas Raam-Krishnadaas
- Page 79 and 80: wider area. Under the auspicies of
- Page 81 and 82: ―Nothig else, just that when you
- Page 83 and 84: Baalar-yuktam tejasam tri-bhuvanam
- Page 85 and 86: Upon returning she observed in plac
- Page 87 and 88: Mahaadevji tried a lot to reason wi
- Page 89 and 90: On the brilliant peak of Mount Kail
- Page 91 and 92: Bhagwaan Shankar in the wheel of Ma
- Page 93 and 94: The child thought how wonderful was
- Page 95 and 96: Mother used to say: ―Son, when du
- Page 97 and 98: ―As you wish‖, saying so the gr
- Page 99 and 100: At this very time, Bhagwaan Raam sh
- Page 101 and 102: Here, Laxmanji arrived in Pampaapur
- Page 103 and 104: ―Now you decide what we need to d
- Page 105 and 106: entourage of demons in fist and squ
- Page 107 and 108: [ 9 ] In the tall gold buildings st
- Page 109 and 110: lying there part naked. Hanumaanji
- Page 111 and 112: y birth, and also Raghunaath‘s en
statues of Hanumaanji‘s face have moustache bent at the ends – so has anyone seen such<br />
moustaches on the faces of the monkeys? Yes, humans do have them. What do these<br />
moustaches suggest? It is worth thinking over.<br />
Not observing the essential foundation of Maharshi Vaalmik, just as the story telling of<br />
the Puraans began in Bhaarat, so did the stories of hanumaan and Sugriva etc, spread out.<br />
Think over, can it happen for there to be a kingdom of the monkeys? In Ramaayan there<br />
is description of Kishkindhaa, a wealthy kingdom similar to those of the humans. In<br />
which case how can the residents and statesmen administrators of that kingdom be<br />
believed to be monkeys? Yes, in the construction of poetic verses some names may get<br />
attached to their synonym. By above facts, it becomes apparent that Hanumaan etc. were<br />
not tailed monkeys. But they were humans.<br />
Hunumaan was a great intellectual, in that subject thee is a prevalent example. Once in<br />
Bhagwaan Raam‘s court, the mind knower (antaryaami) Ramchandraji observed the mind<br />
set of members that Hanumaan was a servant / guard sitting constantly at the feet of<br />
Raamchandraji. He cannot be included in the class of intellectuals. Observing this neglect<br />
/ disrespect of Hanumaan, Bhagwaan could not tolerate it. So to expose the intellectual<br />
brilliance of his devotee, suddenly in the full court he asked Hanumaanji a question –<br />
who are you? Hearing the question, Hanumaanji was astonished – does not my sweet<br />
Lord not know me? Surely it seems this question is being asked with an intent to the one<br />
who is ever present at his sanctified holy feet. So this could not remain hidden from<br />
intellectual Hanumaan. Immediately with clasped hands standing up within the ear shot<br />
of all courtiers in clear and full of intellectual words he couteously said:<br />
By the consciousness of the gross body, I am your servant – you are my dear as life Lord<br />
In practical terms I am part of you the resident in all - In mind set of individual being<br />
From the angle of the aatma, I – you is that only one<br />
From the vision of the Bhrahm, I am not nor are you<br />
In the inexpressible, how can exist you and me?<br />
By such reply there was a great surprise in the court. Hanumaanji got accounted amongst<br />
the best knowledgeable and intellectuals. By this example it becomes clear that<br />
hanumaanji was great knowledgeable intellectual, who can say that such spiritual<br />
knowledge exists in monkey with tail?. So by this it becomes very apparent Hanumaan<br />
was a human.<br />
In Muktikopnishad, Sri Raamchandraji in peaching to Hanumaanji says:<br />
Vasanaam sam-parityajya mayi chin-maatra vigrahe |<br />
Yas-tishatathi gata-sneha-ha soham sach-chit-sukhaatma-ka-ha ||<br />
Darshan-a-darshane hitwaa svayam keval roopa-ta-ha |<br />
Ya aaste kapi-shaardul bhrahm sa bhrahm-chitta svayam ||<br />
Meaning: Those beings renouncing all attachments meaning giving up all affection to<br />
anything and stabilising the ―I‖ (ego) on the pure consciuosness considers just me as his<br />
form – that being transcends to become my sat-chit-aanand truth-consciousness-bliss<br />
form. And O greatest Kapi Hanuman. Any being forsaking my visible aqnd invisible and<br />
63 | P a g e
Change language