15.05.2015 Views

Influence of the Processes Parameters on the Properties of The ...

Influence of the Processes Parameters on the Properties of The ...

Influence of the Processes Parameters on the Properties of The ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4.<br />

Experimental Procedures and Protocols for Analyses<br />

In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sessile drop technique, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> solid surface is wetted by single drops <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> probe liquid. A<br />

high resoluti<strong>on</strong> camera captures <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> shape <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> drop and processes this by image analyzing s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware. <strong>The</strong> <br />

c<strong>on</strong>tact angle is linked to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface energy and so, <strong>on</strong>e can estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface energy and discriminate<br />

between polar and apolar interacti<strong>on</strong>s. Organic liquids have surface tensi<strong>on</strong>s that are in a similar range as<br />

solid polymer.<br />

Advantages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this optical approach are <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> precisi<strong>on</strong> and quickness. In additi<strong>on</strong>, placing drops at<br />

different positi<strong>on</strong>s gives <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> opportunity to explore <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> diversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface. <strong>The</strong> disadvantages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this<br />

method are solid sample preparati<strong>on</strong>, camera resoluti<strong>on</strong>, toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> investigati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly two c<strong>on</strong>tact<br />

points. Especially <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> camera angle to obtain a perfect baseline image is important. Baseline inaccuracy is<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> primary c<strong>on</strong>tributor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a lower repeatability [Lander et al., 1993]. C<strong>on</strong>tact angle was measured, by using<br />

a c<strong>on</strong>tact angle meter (GBX Digidrop) apparatus, by a liquid at six different points <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface <strong>on</strong> both<br />

sides <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> polylactide or composite pellets. C<strong>on</strong>tact angles were measured <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface for 4 minutes as after<br />

3 minutes, it was observed that measured angle remained stable.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>tact angle measurements are influenced by several factors. First, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> shape <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> drop is an<br />

important influence. Measurement should take place immediately after <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> drop is placed <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> solid<br />

material. This should cover <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> errors made due to interacti<strong>on</strong> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> material which must be chemically<br />

and physically homogeneous. It is assumed that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> liquid does not react with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> solid and that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> solid<br />

surface is perfectly smooth and rigid. Sec<strong>on</strong>dly, surface roughness and surface impurities are influential<br />

parameters. As a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> drop can have various metastable states, which automatically influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>tact angle. Finally, relative humidity and temperature are factors that provide c<strong>on</strong>tact angle variance<br />

[Rudawska and Jacniacka, 2008].<br />

4 Protocols for Porosity and Pore Size Measurement<br />

4.1 Average Geometric Porosity<br />

<strong>The</strong> thickness and diameter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pellets and scaffold dimensi<strong>on</strong>s were measured at eight different<br />

points with an electr<strong>on</strong>ic vernier caliper. Mass <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pellets and foams was measured <strong>on</strong> an electr<strong>on</strong>ic<br />

digital balance to four decimal points. <strong>The</strong> observed dimensi<strong>on</strong>al data values were used to calculate radius<br />

and volume and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n utilize <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mass obtained to calculate density <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pellet or foam. <strong>The</strong>n finally relative<br />

density and geometric porosity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> foam was calculated. As example, we present in Table 4.2 measured<br />

data <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> PLGA 50:50 pellets and foam before and after sc CO 2 foaming.<br />

Table 4.2: Dimensi<strong>on</strong>al data <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> PLGA 50:50 pellets and foams for geometric porosity.<br />

Pellet Foam Geometric<br />

S/N Diameter Thickness Mass Density Diameter Thickness Mass Density Porosity<br />

d p (mm) Ø p (mm) (mg) d f (mm) Ø f (mm) (mg) P(%)<br />

1 12.9 0.6 85.0 1074.0 25.0 1.9 96.0 101.1 90.6<br />

2 13.0 0.6 91.6 1103.4 23.5 2.1 84.2 93.1 91.6<br />

3 12.9 0.6 96.0 1184.2 25.1 2.1 96.1 94.4 92.0<br />

4 12.9 0.6 94.0 1137.6 31.6 1.9 93.5 62.7 94.5<br />

5 12.9 0.6 83.8 1066.5 27.7 1.7 84.6 83.5 92.2<br />

6 12.9 0.7 100.0 1171.2 24.9 2.0 100.4 101.1 91.4<br />

7 12.9 0.6 95.8 1144.8 25.9 1.7 84.0 96.3 91.6<br />

8 12.9 0.6 101.0 1242.1 26.3 2.3 100.1 81.2 93.5<br />

9 13.0 0.6 84.2 1022.7 32.0 2.0 90.7 55.7 94.6<br />

- 102 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!