15.05.2015 Views

Introduction to Unconstrained Optimization - Scilab

Introduction to Unconstrained Optimization - Scilab

Introduction to Unconstrained Optimization - Scilab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C<br />

x 2<br />

x 2<br />

x 1 x 3<br />

x 3<br />

Figure 28: Convex combination of 3 points.<br />

with 0 ≤ θ 3 ≤ 1. This situation is presented in 28. We shall prove that x 3 is a convex combination<br />

of x 1 , x 2 , x 3 . Indeed, we can develop the equation for x 3 so that all the points x 1 , x 2 , x 3 appear:<br />

x 3 = θ 3 θ 2 x 1 + θ 3 (1 − θ 2 )x 2 + (1 − θ 3 )x 3 . (66)<br />

The weights of the convex combination are θ 3 θ 2 ≥ 0, θ 3 (1 − θ 2 ) ≥ 0 and 1 − θ 3 ≥ 0. Their sum is<br />

equal <strong>to</strong> 1, as proved by the following computation:<br />

θ 3 θ 2 + θ 3 (1 − θ 2 ) + 1 − θ 3 = θ 3 (θ 2 + 1 − θ 2 ) + 1 − θ 3 (67)<br />

= θ 3 + 1 − θ 3 (68)<br />

= 1, (69)<br />

which concludes the proof.<br />

Let us prove that a set is convex if and only if it contains every convex combinations of its<br />

points.<br />

It is direct <strong>to</strong> prove that a set which contains every convex combinations of its points is convex.<br />

Indeed, such a set contains any convex combination of two points, which implies that the set is<br />

convex.<br />

Let us prove that a convex set is so that every convex combination of its points is convex.<br />

The proof can be done by induction on the number k of points in the set C. The definition of the<br />

convex set C implies that the proposition is true for k = 2. Assume that the hypothesis is true<br />

for k points, and let us prove that every convex combination of k + 1 points is in the set C. Let<br />

{x i } i=1,k+1 ∈ C and let {θ i } i=1,k+1 ∈ R be positive scalars such that θ 1 + . . . + θ k + θ k+1 = 1. Let<br />

us prove that<br />

x k+1 = θ 1 x 1 + . . . + θ k x k + θ k+1 x k+1 ∈ C. (70)<br />

All the weights {θ i } i=1,k+1 cannot be equal <strong>to</strong> 0, because they are positive and their sum is<br />

1. Without loss of generality, suppose that 0 < θ k+1 < 1 (if not, simply reorder the points<br />

{x i } i=1,k+1 ). Therefore 1 − θ k+1 > 0. Then let us write x k+1 in the following form<br />

(<br />

)<br />

θ 1<br />

θ k<br />

x k+1 = (1 − θ k+1 ) x 1 + . . . + x k + θ k+1 x k+1 (71)<br />

1 − θ k+1 1 − θ k+1<br />

with<br />

= (1 − θ k+1 )x k + θ k+1 x k+1 , (72)<br />

x k =<br />

θ 1<br />

θ k<br />

x 1 + . . . + x k . (73)<br />

1 − θ k+1 1 − θ k+1<br />

The point x k+1 is a convex combination of k points because the weights are all positive and their<br />

sum is equal <strong>to</strong> one :<br />

θ 1<br />

θ k<br />

+ . . . +<br />

=<br />

1 − θ k+1 1 − θ k+1<br />

1<br />

1 − θ k+1<br />

(θ 1 + . . . + θ k ) (74)<br />

= 1 − θ k+1<br />

1 − θ k+1<br />

(75)<br />

= 1. (76)<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!