local agenda 21 local plan for sustainable development for the ...
local agenda 21 local plan for sustainable development for the ... local agenda 21 local plan for sustainable development for the ...
18 MUNICIPALITY SWOT ANALYSIS – NATURAL CAPITAL STRONG POINTS WEAK POINTS • Location close to the border with Bulgaria, and only 50 km far from the Black Sea. • Road and railway junction and naval traffic • Location on the IV Pan-European traffic Corridor. • Very favourable geographic conditions (in terms of climate, hydrogeology, pedology). • Less polluted environment. • Existence of green areas at the city's periphery. • Reduced level of industrial pollution due to modernised technology in the LaFarge Romcim Medgidia plant. • Sufficient own water resources. • Relatively high level of pollution. • Low index of green area to inhabitant. • Reduced recreational opportunities in the area or in the close vicinity. • Low subsoil resources • Alternation of dry an wet years • Lack of green belts for protection. • Lack of integrated waste management. • Lack of ecological education of the population. • Heavy traffic crossing the city. • Lack of a city ring road. OPPORTUNITIES THREATS • Increase the mobility of the population • Establishment of an ecologic waste landfill. • Implementation of a system for selective waste collection. · • Building the city ring road. • Reduce the air pollution through switching the fuel of the thermal power plant from light liquid to natural gas. • Development of industrial activities • Reduction of the agricultural exploitations • Road junction from Remus Opreanu, as a result of the finalisation of the Bucharest - Constanta highway • Lack of funds to be invested by the local authority for environmental protection. I.2. Structure of the Economic System I.2.1. Description During the post-war period, the economy of the municipality started developing, and the Metallurgic Enterprise for Equipment Medgidia (MEEM) produced the first steel charge in the history of Dobrogea. At the beginning of 1961 there were 6,000 workers hired in eight large enterprises and cooperatives in Medgidia's district. In three years, the number of enterprises jumped to 16 and that of workers to 13,000. In the last years of the communist period, the economy of the city was based on two large enterprises: MEEM and the Cement Factory. In the years following the Revolution of 1989, the municipality went through an obvious transformation process. The transition from a rigid, planned economy to the requirements of capitalism triggered a series of difficult tests for economic agents. The big enterprises (like MEEM) closed, making room for the small industry and services. The industrial branches diversified in parallel with a significant increase of the commercial activity, followed by that of industry, agriculture and services.
19 MEDGIDIA The structure of the economic activity in Medgidia municipality in 2004: MAIN ECONOMIC BRANCHES PERCENTAGE Industry 16 % Agriculture 8 % Commerce 54 % Constructions 3 % Transport 7 % Services 12 % TOTAL 100 % According to this data, the descending trend of the municipality's economy that began after 1989 has stopped. In order to have sustainable development, it is necessary to invigorate the industry, to access projects and European partnerships, to develop public-private partnerships. NUMERICAL EVOLUTION OF ECONOMIC OPERATORS 2000-2003 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 Number of economic operators at 31.12. 200X Number of active companies in 200X Number of companies aw arde for special results in 200X*
- Page 1 and 2: 1 MEDGIDIA Medgidia City Hall LOCAL
- Page 3 and 4: 3 MEDGIDIA Local Steering Committee
- Page 5 and 6: 5 MEDGIDIA CONTENT I. ASSESSMENT OF
- Page 7 and 8: 7 MEDGIDIA Foreword by the United N
- Page 9 and 10: 9 MEDGIDIA Foreword by The Mayor of
- Page 11 and 12: 11 MEDGIDIA THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOP
- Page 13 and 14: 13 MEDGIDIA Land use Land within th
- Page 15 and 16: 15 MEDGIDIA The auto-laboratory ana
- Page 17: 17 MEDGIDIA Quantity of Empty Packa
- Page 21 and 22: 21 MEDGIDIA Most of the companies a
- Page 23 and 24: 23 MEDGIDIA Weight of the main indu
- Page 25 and 26: 25 MEDGIDIA Horses 80 80 60 120 Don
- Page 27 and 28: 27 MEDGIDIA The range of services i
- Page 29 and 30: 29 MEDGIDIA and natural gas. Due to
- Page 31 and 32: 31 MEDGIDIA SECTOR STRONG POINTS WE
- Page 33 and 34: 33 MEDGIDIA 3. SOCIAL CAPITAL I.3.1
- Page 35 and 36: 35 MEDGIDIA The Working Force The s
- Page 37 and 38: 37 MEDGIDIA The evolution of the po
- Page 39 and 40: 39 MEDGIDIA 2005 compared to previo
- Page 41 and 42: 41 MEDGIDIA I.4. CULTURE I.4.1. Cul
- Page 43 and 44: 43 MEDGIDIA • “Iftimie Ilisei
- Page 45 and 46: 45 MEDGIDIA SWOT ANALYSIS - CULTURE
- Page 47 and 48: 47 MEDGIDIA II.SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPM
- Page 49 and 50: 49 MEDGIDIA III. LOCAL ACTION PLAN
- Page 51 and 52: 51 MEDGIDIA The existing legal and
- Page 53 and 54: 53 MEDGIDIA III. Income with specia
- Page 55 and 56: 55 MEDGIDIA C. Financial operations
- Page 57 and 58: 57 MEDGIDIA Social assistance, allo
- Page 59 and 60: 59 MEDGIDIA III.6. INSTITUTIONAL ST
- Page 61 and 62: 61 MEDGIDIA 5 Development of specif
- Page 63 and 64: 63 MEDGIDIA 3. Improvement of livin
- Page 65 and 66: 65 MEDGIDIA 12. 13. Programme conce
- Page 67 and 68: 67 MEDGIDIA SOCIAL No. 1. 2. 3. 4.
18<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
SWOT ANALYSIS – NATURAL CAPITAL<br />
STRONG POINTS<br />
WEAK POINTS<br />
• Location close to <strong>the</strong> border with Bulgaria, and only 50 km far<br />
from <strong>the</strong> Black Sea.<br />
• Road and railway junction and naval traffic<br />
• Location on <strong>the</strong> IV Pan-European traffic Corridor.<br />
• Very favourable geographic conditions (in terms of climate,<br />
hydrogeology, pedology).<br />
• Less polluted environment.<br />
• Existence of green areas at <strong>the</strong> city's periphery.<br />
• Reduced level of industrial pollution due to modernised<br />
technology in <strong>the</strong> LaFarge Romcim Medgidia <strong>plan</strong>t.<br />
• Sufficient own water resources.<br />
• Relatively high level of pollution.<br />
• Low index of green area to inhabitant.<br />
• Reduced recreational opportunities in <strong>the</strong> area or in <strong>the</strong> close<br />
vicinity.<br />
• Low subsoil resources<br />
• Alternation of dry an wet years<br />
• Lack of green belts <strong>for</strong> protection.<br />
• Lack of integrated waste management.<br />
• Lack of ecological education of <strong>the</strong> population.<br />
• Heavy traffic crossing <strong>the</strong> city.<br />
• Lack of a city ring road.<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
THREATS<br />
• Increase <strong>the</strong> mobility of <strong>the</strong> population<br />
• Establishment of an ecologic waste landfill.<br />
• Implementation of a system <strong>for</strong> selective waste collection. ·<br />
• Building <strong>the</strong> city ring road.<br />
• Reduce <strong>the</strong> air pollution through switching <strong>the</strong> fuel of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>rmal power <strong>plan</strong>t from light liquid to natural gas.<br />
• Development of industrial activities<br />
• Reduction of <strong>the</strong> agricultural exploitations<br />
• Road junction from Remus Opreanu, as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
finalisation of <strong>the</strong> Bucharest - Constanta highway<br />
• Lack of funds to be invested by <strong>the</strong> <strong>local</strong> authority <strong>for</strong><br />
environmental protection.<br />
I.2. Structure of <strong>the</strong> Economic System<br />
I.2.1. Description<br />
During <strong>the</strong> post-war period, <strong>the</strong> economy of <strong>the</strong> municipality<br />
started developing, and <strong>the</strong> Metallurgic Enterprise <strong>for</strong><br />
Equipment Medgidia (MEEM) produced <strong>the</strong> first steel<br />
charge in <strong>the</strong> history of Dobrogea.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> beginning of 1961 <strong>the</strong>re were 6,000 workers hired<br />
in eight large enterprises and cooperatives in Medgidia's<br />
district. In three years, <strong>the</strong> number of enterprises jumped to<br />
16 and that of workers to 13,000. In <strong>the</strong> last years of <strong>the</strong><br />
communist period, <strong>the</strong> economy of <strong>the</strong> city was based on<br />
two large enterprises: MEEM and <strong>the</strong> Cement Factory.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> years following <strong>the</strong> Revolution of 1989, <strong>the</strong> municipality<br />
went through an obvious trans<strong>for</strong>mation process. The<br />
transition from a rigid, <strong>plan</strong>ned economy to <strong>the</strong><br />
requirements of capitalism triggered a series of difficult<br />
tests <strong>for</strong> economic agents. The big enterprises (like<br />
MEEM) closed, making room <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> small industry and<br />
services. The industrial branches diversified in parallel with<br />
a significant increase of <strong>the</strong> commercial activity, followed<br />
by that of industry, agriculture and services.