Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes
Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes
11) Unless the Council agree in writing that a set extent of development must commence to enable compliance with this condition, no development shall commence until the approved remediation method statement has been carried out in full and a verification report confirming these works has been submitted to, and approved in writing, by the Council. This report shall include: details of the remediation works carried out; results of any verification sampling, testing or monitoring including the analysis of any imported soil; all waste management documentation showing the classification of waste, its treatment, movement and disposal; and the validation of gas membrane placement. If, during development, contamination not previously identified is found to be present at the site, the Council is to be informed immediately and no further development (unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Council) shall be carried out until a report indicating the nature of the contamination and how it is to be dealt with is submitted to, and agreed in writing by, the Council. Any required remediation shall be detailed in an amendment to the remediation statement and verification of these works included in the verification report. All works must be carried out in compliance with and by a competent person who conforms to CLR 11: Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination (Defra 2004) or the current UK requirements for sampling and testing. To ensure that no unacceptable risks are caused to humans, controlled waters or the wider environment during and following the development works, in accordance with Borough Wide Strategic Policy CC4 of the Core Strategy and policies DM H7 and H11 of the Development Management Local Plan. 12) Unless the Council agree in writing that a set extent of development must commence to enable compliance with this condition, no development shall commence until an onward long-term monitoring methodology report is submitted to and approved in writing by the Council where further monitoring is required past the completion of development works to verify the success of the remediation undertaken. A verification report of these monitoring works shall then be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council when it may be demonstrated that no residual adverse risks exist. All works must be carried out in compliance with and by a competent person who conforms to CLR 11: Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination (Defra 2004) or the current UK requirements for sampling and testing. To ensure that no unacceptable risks are caused to humans, controlled waters or the wider environment during and following the development works, in accordance with Borough Wide Strategic Policy CC4 of the Core Strategy and policies DM H7 and H11 of the Development Management Local Plan. 13) The temporary landscaping and boundary treatment hereby approved shall be replaced within 18 months of the date of commencement of development with a more permanent proposal unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Council. Before such time, details of a permanent replacement scheme shall be submitted for approval to the Council. Reason: In order to ensure a satisfactory long term development is secured which enhances the street scene and the conservation area in accordance with Policies DM G1 and DM G7 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013).
14) To submit details of a permanent replacement scheme to the Council for approval within 15 months of the date of the planning permission unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Council. Reason: In order to ensure a satisfactory long term development is secured which enhances the street scene and the conservation area in accordance with Policies DM G1 and DM G7 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013). Justification for Approving the Application: 1) Justification 1. Demolition: The proposal represents a high quality landscaping scheme which would enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area. The development is therefore considered to be acceptable in accordance with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 and 7.8 of the London Plan (2011) and policy BE1 of the Core Strategy and Polices DM G7, DM G1 and DM E4 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013). 2. Design: The proposal represents a high quality development which would make a positive contribution to the public realm and enhances the character and appearance of the conservation area. The development is therefore considered to be acceptable in accordance with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 and 7.8 of the London Plan (2011) and policy BE1 of the Core Strategy and Polices DM G7, DM G1 and DM E4 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013) 3. Flood Risk: A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has been submitted and has considered risks of flooding to the site and adequate preventative measures have been identified and secured. The development is therefore considered to be acceptable in accordance with the NPPF and London Plan Policy 5.12 and Core Strategy Policies CC1 and CC2. 4. Temporary loss of housing (including affordable housing): Although London Plan Policy 3.14 seeks to retain existing housing in London, London Plan Policy 3.4 seeks to optimise housing potential. In this regard the quality of the existing housing on site is poor and redevelopment of the Site would enable the provision of better quality, fit for purpose housing whilst optimising the potential of the site which has been indentified in the SHLAA as having potential for an approximate 50% increase in capacity. Increasing the density on site would be more sustainable in line with the objectives of the NPPF. The demolition would assist and accelerate a future housing scheme coming forward in 2014 and the Council have sufficient comfort from the advanced stage of the Council's JV programme that this will occur. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2000 LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS All Background Papers held by Michael Merrington (Ext: 3453): Application form received: 24th June 2013 Drawing Nos: see above
- Page 1 and 2: London Borough Of Hammersmith & Ful
- Page 3 and 4: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
- Page 5: with Borough Wide Strategic Policy
- Page 9 and 10: minutes walk to Fulham Town Centre.
- Page 11 and 12: • Raised a number of queries rela
- Page 13 and 14: 5.12 Although most applications for
- Page 15 and 16: western boundary will be retained a
- Page 17 and 18: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
- Page 19 and 20: Consultation Comments: Comments fro
- Page 21 and 22: Applicant: Westfield Shoppingtowns
- Page 23 and 24: Policies DM G1, DM G3 and DM H10 of
- Page 25 and 26: egeneration of the White City area
- Page 27 and 28: 1.3 Ariel Way and the White City In
- Page 29 and 30: 2.3 The proposed extension will mir
- Page 31 and 32: Sustainability and Energy Access No
- Page 33 and 34: viability. The expansion of Net-a-P
- Page 35 and 36: 4.28 The appearance of the scheme h
- Page 37 and 38: combined with the retail and leisur
- Page 39 and 40: Car Parking 4.57 A total of 4,500 c
- Page 41 and 42: that developments which are located
- Page 43 and 44: contribute to the wider Opportunity
- Page 45 and 46: Applicant: The Governing Body Pope
- Page 47 and 48: In order that the Council may be sa
- Page 49 and 50: hours of use; the number and times
- Page 51 and 52: To ensure that the amenity of occup
- Page 53 and 54: Management of Land Contamination (D
- Page 55 and 56: 39) The use of the replacement Fati
14) To submit details of a permanent replacement scheme to the Council for approval<br />
within 15 months of the date of the planning permission unless otherwise agreed<br />
in writing with the Council.<br />
Reason: In order to ensure a satisfactory long term development is secured which<br />
enhances the street scene <strong>and</strong> the conservation area in accordance with Policies<br />
DM G1 <strong>and</strong> DM G7 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013).<br />
Justification for Approving the Application:<br />
1) Justification<br />
1. Demolition: The proposal represents a high quality l<strong>and</strong>scaping scheme which<br />
would enhance the character <strong>and</strong> appearance of the conservation area. The<br />
development is therefore considered to be acceptable in accordance with Policies<br />
7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 <strong>and</strong> 7.8 of the London Plan (2011) <strong>and</strong> policy BE1 of the<br />
Core Strategy <strong>and</strong> Polices DM G7, DM G1 <strong>and</strong> DM E4 of the Development<br />
Management Local Plan (2013).<br />
2. Design: The proposal represents a high quality development which would make<br />
a positive contribution to the public realm <strong>and</strong> enhances the character <strong>and</strong><br />
appearance of the conservation area. The development is therefore considered to<br />
be acceptable in accordance with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 <strong>and</strong> 7.8 of the<br />
London Plan (2011) <strong>and</strong> policy BE1 of the Core Strategy <strong>and</strong> Polices DM G7, DM<br />
G1 <strong>and</strong> DM E4 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013)<br />
3. Flood Risk: A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has been submitted <strong>and</strong> has<br />
considered risks of flooding to the site <strong>and</strong> adequate preventative measures have<br />
been identified <strong>and</strong> secured. The development is therefore considered to be<br />
acceptable in accordance with the NPPF <strong>and</strong> London Plan Policy 5.12 <strong>and</strong> Core<br />
Strategy Policies CC1 <strong>and</strong> CC2.<br />
4. Temporary loss of housing (including affordable housing): Although London<br />
Plan Policy 3.14 seeks to retain existing housing in London, London Plan Policy<br />
3.4 seeks to optimise housing potential. In this regard the quality of the existing<br />
housing on site is poor <strong>and</strong> redevelopment of the Site would enable the provision<br />
of better quality, fit for purpose housing whilst optimising the potential of the site<br />
which has been indentified in the SHLAA as having potential for an approximate<br />
50% increase in capacity. Increasing the density on site would be more<br />
sustainable in line with the objectives of the NPPF. The demolition would assist<br />
<strong>and</strong> accelerate a future housing scheme coming forward in 2014 <strong>and</strong> the Council<br />
have sufficient comfort from the advanced stage of the Council's JV programme<br />
that this will occur.<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2000<br />
LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS<br />
All Background Papers held by Michael Merrington (Ext: 3453):<br />
Application form received: 24th June 2013<br />
Drawing Nos: see above
Change language