Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

development likely to cause demonstrable harm to their ecological (habitats and
species) value. The main potential for impact of the proposed development upon the
open space and nature conservation area would be the demolition of the nursery
building which lies to the north of the community garden. The new built development
proposed is located at some distance from this area of the site, however; and it is
considered that the proposal would not be harmful to the quality of the designated open
space or nature conservation area.
3.13 The proposed new building and demolition of the nursery would impact on the
open space within the site. It is considered on balance, however, that the c.200sq.m
loss of open space on the site would be justifiable in view of the improved school
facilities the development would result in and the rationalisation of the remaining play
space. The demolition of the existing nursery would create a more useable area of
playspace on the eastern side of the site. It is proposed to create a new multi use
games area in the north eastern corner of the site which would allow a range of sports
to take place with a separately fenced court. To the south of the new school building it
is proposed to create a new landscaped playspace. It is considered that the two new
areas of playspace together with the remaining open areas on the eastern side of the
site would compensate for the small overall reduction in playspace and therefore would
be acceptable in this instance.
DESIGN
3.14 Paragraph 58 of the NPPF states that planning decisions should aim to ensure
that developments 'will function well and add to the overall quality of the area, not just
for the short term but over the lifetime of the development; establish a strong sense of
place, using streetscapes and buildings to create attractive and comfortable places to
live, work and visit; optimise the potential of the site to accommodate development,
create and sustain an appropriate mix of uses (including incorporation of green and
other public space as part of developments) and support local facilities and transport
networks; respond to local character and history, and reflect the identity of local
surroundings and materials, while not preventing or discouraging appropriate
innovation; create safe and accessible environments where crime and disorder, and the
fear of crime, do not undermine quality of life or community cohesion; and are visually
attractive as a result of good architecture and appropriate landscaping'. Paragraph 60
states 'Planning policies and decisions should not attempt to impose architectural styles
or particular tastes and they should not stifle innovation, originality or initiative through
unsubstantiated requirements to conform to certain development forms or styles. It is,
however, proper to seek to promote or reinforce local distinctiveness'.
3.15 London Plan policy 7.1 requires that all new development is of high quality that
responds to the surrounding context and improves access to social and community
infrastructure, contributes to the provision of high quality living environments and
enhances the character, legibility, permeability and accessibility of the surrounding
neighbourhood.
3.16 London Plan policy 7.4 states that 'Buildings, streets and open spaces should
provide a high quality design response that: a) has regard to the pattern and grain of the
existing spaces and streets in orientation, scale, proportion and mass, b) contributes to
a positive relationship between the urban structure and natural landscape features, c) is
human in scale, ensuring buildings create a positive relationship with street level activity
and people feel comfortable with their surroundings, d) allows existing buildings and