Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

This is based on the elevation comprising insulated steel cladding panels within the following minimum octave band sound reduction index Rw values: Frequency 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k Hz Rw 16 20 24 31 35 29 36 dB 4.50 Plant, louvres, inlets and outlets would be attenuated so that the ambient LA90 Noise levels are not increased. This means that, in line with the original development, noise levels from services systems would not generally exceed the following LAeq levels when measured at 1m from the plant or louvre: Area Day Night General Locations 65 Laeq 55 Laeq 4.51 The Council's Environmental Health officer has advised that the full details of the external noise level emitted from plant/ machinery/ equipment and mitigation measures should be submitted to the local authority for approval, prior to implementation. The measures would need to ensure that the external noise level emitted from plant, machinery/ equipment will be lower than the lowest existing background noise level by at least 10dBA, as assessed according to BS4142:1997 at the nearest and/or most affected noise sensitive premises, with all machinery operating together at maximum capacity. 4.52 In terms of noise during the course of construction, a Construction Management Plan is submitted as part of this application. This document provides discussion of measures to ensure that the noise impact of construction is mitigated for neighbouring properties. A condition is recommended to ensure the noise levels during construction meet the policy requirements noted above. 4.53 With the recommended conditions imposed, it is considered that the amenity of occupiers of surrounding premises would not be adversely affected by noise from plant/mechanical installations/ equipment, of from construction, in accordance with Policy DM H9 of the Development Management Local Plan and SPD Amenity policies 18 and 24. Transport and Parking 4.54 The transport effect of the proposed development has been assessed against the existing baseline position (existing shopping centre), which is 171,562m² GFA of retail and leisure floorspace, and the future baseline position (consented extension of shopping centre), which is 230,660m² GFA of retail and leisure floorspace. This is considered to be a robust method of assessment. 4.55 The site has a PTAL score ranging from 5 to 6a using Transport for London's (TfL's) methodology. Access 4.56 The proposed development does not include any amendments to the access arrangements to the Westfield London Shopping Centre.
Car Parking 4.57 A total of 4,500 car parking spaces are provided at Westfield London Shopping Centre (reducing to 3,500 spaces Monday - Friday). No additional spaces are proposed as part of the development proposals, which is supported. Cycle Parking 4.58 The existing cycle parking provision is 448 cycle parking spaces and 154 London Cycle Hire Scheme docking stations at Westfield London Shopping Centre and adjoining transport interchanges. No additional spaces are proposed as part of the development proposals, which the applicant states is reflective of the observed take up and demand of existing cycle parking spaces and cycle hire docking stations. 4.59 This would be below Development Management Local Plan 2013 and London Plan 2011 standards. However, to support this provision, the applicant has provided evidence of an underutilisation of the existing cycle parking facilities. It is considered that no additional cycle storage is required at this point in time, but that provision can be increased through the Travel Plan, should demand increase. Both TfL and the LBHF Highways Officers endorse this approach. Travel Plan 4.60 Westfield London Shopping Centre's Travel Plan should be updated to reflect the development proposals. It is stated that Net-a-Porter will continue to promote and support the principles and objectives of the Travel Plan and will continue to encourage sustainable travel to and from Westfield London Shopping Centre. Net-a-Porter will make all new staff aware that no dedicated staff parking is provided at Westfield London Shopping Centre. Multi Modal Trips 4.61 The trip attraction of the proposed increase of Net-a-Porter's floorspace has been derived using the TRAVL database. This approach was agreed with LBHF and TfL officers to calculate the trip attraction of the consented extension to the shopping centre. 4.62 The TRAVL calculated daily modal split data for B1 office land use is summarised below. Mode Mode Split Car Driver 2.0% Car Passenger 1.1% Motorcycle 1.0% Taxi 0.5% Rail 29.1% Bus 9.0% Underground 19.0% Walk 37.6% Bicycle 0.7% TOTAL 100.0% 4.63 There are no dedicated staff car parking facilities at Westfield London Shopping Centre, and the TRAVL calculated modal split reflects this, with a 2% car driver mode share.
Page 1 and 2: London Borough Of Hammersmith & Ful
Page 3 and 4: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 5 and 6: with Borough Wide Strategic Policy
Page 7 and 8: 14) To submit details of a permanen
Page 9 and 10: minutes walk to Fulham Town Centre.
Page 11 and 12: • Raised a number of queries rela
Page 13 and 14: 5.12 Although most applications for
Page 15 and 16: western boundary will be retained a
Page 17 and 18: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 19 and 20: Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 21 and 22: Applicant: Westfield Shoppingtowns
Page 23 and 24: Policies DM G1, DM G3 and DM H10 of
Page 25 and 26: egeneration of the White City area
Page 27 and 28: 1.3 Ariel Way and the White City In
Page 29 and 30: 2.3 The proposed extension will mir
Page 31 and 32: Sustainability and Energy Access No
Page 33 and 34: viability. The expansion of Net-a-P
Page 35 and 36: 4.28 The appearance of the scheme h
Page 37: combined with the retail and leisur
Page 41 and 42: that developments which are located
Page 43 and 44: contribute to the wider Opportunity
Page 45 and 46: Applicant: The Governing Body Pope
Page 47 and 48: In order that the Council may be sa
Page 49 and 50: hours of use; the number and times
Page 51 and 52: To ensure that the amenity of occup
Page 53 and 54: Management of Land Contamination (D
Page 55 and 56: 39) The use of the replacement Fati
Page 57 and 58: 6. Access and Crime Prevention: Sub
Page 59 and 60: part of an informal consultation pr
Page 61 and 62: ii) The design and impact of the pr
Page 63 and 64: dioceses to discourage free use of
Page 65 and 66: structures that make a positive con
Page 67 and 68: at first floor level, with the majo
Page 69 and 70: HIGHWAYS and PARKING 3.33 The NPPF
Page 71 and 72: document that should be annually re
Page 73 and 74: levy is set at £0 per square metre
Page 75 and 76: Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 77 and 78: of any proposed storage enclosure,
Page 79 and 80: 17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 81 and 82: 25) No development shall commence u
Page 83 and 84: 30) The sports pitches/courts hereb
Page 85 and 86: Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 87 and 88: 2.3 The Football Association (FA) h
Page 89 and 90:
- Large facility surrounded by 3m f
Page 91 and 92:
applicants state that small-sided f
Page 93 and 94:
3.12 It is noted that the existing
Page 95 and 96:
it is appropriate for the intended
Page 97 and 98:
was proposed by the applicant that
Page 99 and 100:
collection arrangements, including
Page 101 and 102:
4.0 CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATION
Page 103 and 104:
Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 105 and 106:
4 Wolfe House Australia Road White
Page 107 and 108:
Applicant: Fruition Properties C/O
Page 109 and 110:
to occupation of the development he
Page 111 and 112:
17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 113 and 114:
Contamination (Defra 2004) or the c
Page 115 and 116:
At least one of the proposed spaces
Page 117 and 118:
unacceptable noise and disturbance
Page 119 and 120:
2.0 PUBLICITY AND CONSULTATIONS 2.1
Page 121 and 122:
3.5 In this instance, the Class B8
Page 123 and 124:
ack from the frontage. In relation
Page 125 and 126:
additional loss of privacy to Court
Page 127 and 128:
which is in accordance with the Cou
Page 129 and 130:
on its merits and reach a decision
Page 131 and 132:
Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
Page 133 and 134:
8) The development shall not commen
Page 135 and 136:
To ensure a satisfactory external a
Page 137 and 138:
are caused to humans, controlled wa
Page 139 and 140:
the council. The approved details s
Page 141 and 142:
Neighbour Comments: Letters from: D
Page 143 and 144:
3.0 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 The
Page 145 and 146:
3.10 and 3.11; b) affordable housin
Page 147 and 148:
of the desirability of sustaining a
Page 149 and 150:
3.33 All units would be built to Li
Page 151 and 152:
HIGHWAYS MATTERS Car parking and tr
Page 153 and 154:
including the incorporation of sust
Page 155 and 156:
3.70 The scheme has been assessed f
Page 157 and 158:
Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
show all

Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?