13.05.2015 Views

Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.28 The appearance of the scheme has been designed as an extension to the existing<br />

façade language <strong>and</strong> massing. As such, the existing palette of materials <strong>and</strong> colours is<br />

to be extended into the new development.<br />

4.29 In summary, the design of the proposed roof extension is considered to fully<br />

accord with the relevant policies of the London Plan, Core Strategy <strong>and</strong> Development<br />

Management Local Plan.<br />

Heritage Considerations<br />

4.30 The roof extension would not be seen within any key views with the Grade II listed<br />

Dimco building, currently used as a substation <strong>and</strong> bus st<strong>and</strong> on Ariel Way. As such, the<br />

proposals are not considered to have any impacts on its setting.<br />

4.31 The other nearby heritage assets are the Wood Lane Conservation Area <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Grade II listed BBC Television Centre, both of which are to the north of the<br />

Hammersmith <strong>and</strong> City Line viaduct <strong>and</strong> a significant distance from the roofspace where<br />

the proposed extension is to be located. There are no Conservation Areas in RBKC<br />

immediately adjacent to the West Cross Route at this point.<br />

4.32 As such, there are considered to be no adverse impacts upon nearby heritage<br />

assets.<br />

Townscape <strong>and</strong> Visual Impact<br />

4.33 Views of the proposed extension from the pedestrian public realm would be limited<br />

to the raised H junction above the A3220 (West Cross Route). Although the corner of<br />

the Shopping Centre itself presents an important elevation to the West Cross Route <strong>and</strong><br />

to pedestrians accessing the site from the east side of the West Cross Route, the office<br />

extension is set back from the corner in a visually less prominent position. As such, the<br />

impact of the development on the townscape is considered to be limited.<br />

4.34 Officers have considered the cumulative effects of the proposed roof extension,<br />

alongside the approved retail <strong>and</strong> leisure extension on the corner of the shopping<br />

centre. It is considered that the roofscape in the north east corner does not have a<br />

strong presence in urban design terms. It lacks either the setback element of the<br />

cinema box on the north elevation or the glazed cantilever of the Net a Porter offices on<br />

the eastern elevation facing the West Cross Route. Both developments provide<br />

opportunities to reinforce a more continuous <strong>and</strong> consistent roofscape <strong>and</strong> create a<br />

stronger corner with more presence in townscape terms. The Net-a-Porter extension is<br />

considerably smaller in scale <strong>and</strong> in height compared to the retail <strong>and</strong> leisure extension.<br />

4.35 The current office proposal <strong>and</strong> consented leisure/retail scheme would also be<br />

seen in the context of the consented Westfield 2 development which will include a<br />

residential tower on the North West corner of the H junction opposite the north east<br />

corner of the shopping centre. Individually <strong>and</strong> collectively, it is considered that the<br />

office extension would not have any harmful impacts on the surrounding townscape.<br />

Access<br />

4.36 The proposed floorspace would be accessed via the existing offices at level 60<br />

from the main Shopping Centre. Lift access is provided from within the existing offices

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!