Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Environment Agency: No response Thames Water: No response London Fire and Emergency Service: No response Network Rail: No response National Air Traffic services: No response British Airports Authority: No response Hammersmith and Fulham Primary Care Trust (PCT): No response Environmental Impact Assessment: 3.2 Having regard to the duty on the Council under regulation 7 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 (the EIA Regulations) Officers have considered whether the office application is one which should require an environmental impact assessment given the cumulative effect of the developments occurring on this site. Officers have reviewed the information submitted as part of the application and other recent approved applications as part of our consideration. Having done so, in this case it is concluded that an environmental impact assessment is not required for the following reasons: 3.3 Whilst it is noted that the recent phase 2 expansion plans, the original planning application and subsequent modified consents on this site were both subject to environmental impact assessments, this application, like the retail and leisure extension (approved recently) is a self-contained application for planning permission. It is not an application for a change to or extension of an EIA development, and consequently schedule 2 paragraph 13 to the EIA regulations does not apply. 3.4 The area of development comprised in the application is less than 0.5 hectares and it is considered that the development subject of this application would be unlikely to have significant environmental effects when judged on its own account or cumulatively with other development in the area (this 'other development' includes the development to the north of the Westfield London centre which was permitted by the council in March 2011 but which has not yet commenced (ref: 2011/02940/OUT) and the recently approved retail and leisure extension (ref: 2013/01074/FUL). For this reason, it is considered that a full environmental impact assessment is not required to support the development proposed in this application. 4.0 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 4.1 The main planning considerations are as follows: Principle of Development Suitability of Land Uses Design Impact on Neighbouring Properties Transport and Parking
Sustainability and Energy Access Noise Flood Risk Planning Obligations Principle of Development 4.2 The application needs to be considered in accordance with the provision which requires determinations to be in accordance with the development plan where relevant unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The development plan for the Borough consists of the London Plan, the Council's Core Strategy and the Development Management Local Plan. Outside the development plan there is also important guidance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) where there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development. 4.3 Both the NPPF and the London Plan advocate the need to optimise the use of land and accommodate economic growth through intensification specifically within areas of high public transport accessibility. 4.4 The site falls within the White City Opportunity Area (WCOA) as identified within the London Plan and the Council's Core Strategy. Within the London Plan, Opportunity Areas (OAs) are defined as 'the capital's major reservoir of brownfield land with significant capacity to accommodate new housing, commercial and other development linked to existing or potential improvements to public transport accessibility'. Part B of Policy 2.13 (Opportunity Areas and Intensification Areas) states that development proposals within OAs should 'seek to optimise residential and non-residential output and densities, provide necessary social and other infrastructure to sustain growth, and, where appropriate, contain a mix of uses'. 4.5 One of the key challenges identified within the LBHF Core Strategy is the need to regenerate town centres and local centres, specifically through the better utilisation of sites within the designated town centres to ensure the continued provision of a wide range of high quality retailing, services, arts and cultural and other leisure facilities to serve local residents, visitors and workers. 4.6 Both the Development Management and the Core Strategy seek the regeneration of areas and aim to sustain a mix of uses. Strategic Policy A of the Core Strategy (Planning for Regeneration and Growth) recognises the need to focus regeneration and growth within the WCOA and the other key regeneration areas. The supporting text to the policy notes that demand exists for offices within the town centre and encourages such provision as it can continue to support and enhance the local economy. Office uses are also supported within the strategic opportunity area policies. 4.7 The Application seeks to provide new Class B1 (office) floorspace connected to an existing office. The offices which are being enlarged relates to Net-a-Porter who are an established on-line retailer. It is considered that the provision of offices would serve to complement the variety of land uses in the shopping centre and of Shepherds Bush Metropolitan Town Centre. As a result of the development, it is considered that Shepherds Bush's status as a diverse town centre destination would be enhanced. As such, it is considered that the principle of development is in full accordance with planning policy requirements.
Page 1 and 2: London Borough Of Hammersmith & Ful
Page 3 and 4: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 5 and 6: with Borough Wide Strategic Policy
Page 7 and 8: 14) To submit details of a permanen
Page 9 and 10: minutes walk to Fulham Town Centre.
Page 11 and 12: • Raised a number of queries rela
Page 13 and 14: 5.12 Although most applications for
Page 15 and 16: western boundary will be retained a
Page 17 and 18: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 19 and 20: Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 21 and 22: Applicant: Westfield Shoppingtowns
Page 23 and 24: Policies DM G1, DM G3 and DM H10 of
Page 25 and 26: egeneration of the White City area
Page 27 and 28: 1.3 Ariel Way and the White City In
Page 29: 2.3 The proposed extension will mir
Page 33 and 34: viability. The expansion of Net-a-P
Page 35 and 36: 4.28 The appearance of the scheme h
Page 37 and 38: combined with the retail and leisur
Page 39 and 40: Car Parking 4.57 A total of 4,500 c
Page 41 and 42: that developments which are located
Page 43 and 44: contribute to the wider Opportunity
Page 45 and 46: Applicant: The Governing Body Pope
Page 47 and 48: In order that the Council may be sa
Page 49 and 50: hours of use; the number and times
Page 51 and 52: To ensure that the amenity of occup
Page 53 and 54: Management of Land Contamination (D
Page 55 and 56: 39) The use of the replacement Fati
Page 57 and 58: 6. Access and Crime Prevention: Sub
Page 59 and 60: part of an informal consultation pr
Page 61 and 62: ii) The design and impact of the pr
Page 63 and 64: dioceses to discourage free use of
Page 65 and 66: structures that make a positive con
Page 67 and 68: at first floor level, with the majo
Page 69 and 70: HIGHWAYS and PARKING 3.33 The NPPF
Page 71 and 72: document that should be annually re
Page 73 and 74: levy is set at £0 per square metre
Page 75 and 76: Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 77 and 78: of any proposed storage enclosure,
Page 79 and 80: 17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 81 and 82:
25) No development shall commence u
Page 83 and 84:
30) The sports pitches/courts hereb
Page 85 and 86:
Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 87 and 88:
2.3 The Football Association (FA) h
Page 89 and 90:
- Large facility surrounded by 3m f
Page 91 and 92:
applicants state that small-sided f
Page 93 and 94:
3.12 It is noted that the existing
Page 95 and 96:
it is appropriate for the intended
Page 97 and 98:
was proposed by the applicant that
Page 99 and 100:
collection arrangements, including
Page 101 and 102:
4.0 CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATION
Page 103 and 104:
Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 105 and 106:
4 Wolfe House Australia Road White
Page 107 and 108:
Applicant: Fruition Properties C/O
Page 109 and 110:
to occupation of the development he
Page 111 and 112:
17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 113 and 114:
Contamination (Defra 2004) or the c
Page 115 and 116:
At least one of the proposed spaces
Page 117 and 118:
unacceptable noise and disturbance
Page 119 and 120:
2.0 PUBLICITY AND CONSULTATIONS 2.1
Page 121 and 122:
3.5 In this instance, the Class B8
Page 123 and 124:
ack from the frontage. In relation
Page 125 and 126:
additional loss of privacy to Court
Page 127 and 128:
which is in accordance with the Cou
Page 129 and 130:
on its merits and reach a decision
Page 131 and 132:
Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
Page 133 and 134:
8) The development shall not commen
Page 135 and 136:
To ensure a satisfactory external a
Page 137 and 138:
are caused to humans, controlled wa
Page 139 and 140:
the council. The approved details s
Page 141 and 142:
Neighbour Comments: Letters from: D
Page 143 and 144:
3.0 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 The
Page 145 and 146:
3.10 and 3.11; b) affordable housin
Page 147 and 148:
of the desirability of sustaining a
Page 149 and 150:
3.33 All units would be built to Li
Page 151 and 152:
HIGHWAYS MATTERS Car parking and tr
Page 153 and 154:
including the incorporation of sust
Page 155 and 156:
3.70 The scheme has been assessed f
Page 157 and 158:
Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
show all

Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?