Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

sqm, with the space to be used for Class A1, A2 or A3 purposes. This condition has now been varied twice as follows. - In July 2000, permission was granted to vary condition 8 of the outline permission to increase the Class A3 floorspace from 3,558 sqm to 20,486 sqm. The new Class A3 floorspace comprised additional restaurants, food court units and other space previously shown illustratively in the previously proposed link building between the main building and the Dimco buildings. - (Ref: 2005/00168/VAR) In June 2004, as a result of additional space required by an anchor store within the development, an application was made to vary Condition 8 of the 1996 outline planning permission (adding to the 57,597 sqm already permitted) by allowing a further 5,575 sqm Class A1/A2/A3 retail floorspace. This application was withdrawn and a new application submitted in January 2005, again to vary Condition 8 of the 1996 outline planning permission to allow a further 5,575 sqm Class A1/A2/A3 retail floorspace. A resolution by LBHF to approve the proposal was made in June 2005. 1.9 Condition 6 attached to the December 2002 permission requires that the gross lettable (Class A1) floorspace shall not exceed 29,100 sqm. 1.10 On 29 March 2012, LBHF granted outline planning consent (Ref: 2011/02940/OUT) for the redevelopment of land to the north of Ariel Way to allow a mixed use scheme consisting of new additions and alterations to the existing Westfield London shopping centre. The permitted scheme comprises up to 50,855 sqm Class A1 (Retail), up to 5,070 sqm Classes A3, A4 and A5 (Restaurants, Cafes, Bars, Hot-food Take-away use), up to 540 sqm Class B1 (Offices), up to 1,520 sqm Class D1 (Community use) and up to 1,758 sqm Class D2 (Leisure use) floorspace, as well as up to 1,522 residential units. 1.11 On the 29th May 2013, LBHF granted planning consent (Ref: 2013/01074/FUL) for an extension of the existing shopping centre at roof level to comprise 3,092 sqm (Gross Internal Area (GIA)) retail floorspace (A1 Use Class) and 7,249 sqm (GIA) leisure floorspace (D2 Use Class), including identification of external signage zones, relocation of existing plant and addition of new plant and other associated works. 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS 2.1 The development would comprise the erection of a roof level extension immediately to the north of the existing Net-a-Porter office accommodation, located on the eastern elevation of Westfield London. The proposal would create an additional 1490.34sqm of Class B1 (office) floorspace (Gross Internal Area). 2.2 The proposals comprise an extension to the existing offices of Net-a-Porter which are located at Level 60. The extension to Net-a-Porter's offices would be facilitated by a roof extension above Level 55 which will provide Net-a-Porter with additional office accommodation adjacent to their existing offices at Level 60. The proposed development would also displace existing roof plant located on the roof of Level 55. This plant would be relocated to the roof of the existing Net-a-Porter offices (Level 65), and additional plant will need to be located in this area. The applicant has confirmed that the additional B1 office floorspace is required by Net-a-Porter to serve their operational requirements.
2.3 The proposed extension will mirror the height of the existing two storey offices, which stand at 38.95 m AOD. The extension will project northwards across four structural bays, totalling approximately 32m in length. In terms of design, the proposed development will appear as a seamless extension to the existing roof level office accommodation which runs parallel with the eastern elevation of the shopping centre with a slight projecting facade. 2.4 As a consequence of the proposed extension, the relocation of existing roof level plant forms part of these proposals. This plant, together with additional new plant would be accommodated within a new plant deck on top of the roof of the existing Net-a- Porter offices, located immediately to the south of the proposed office extension. The new plant deck would be screened by perimeter louvres. The top of the plant deck would stand at 4.6m above the existing roof ridge level. 2.5 The following technical reports and documents have been submitted in support of the full planning application: - Application drawings by Buchans/Westfield; - Planning Statement by Montagu Evans; - Design and Access Statement, including Waste Management Statement, Acoustic Statement and SUDS Statement by Buchans/Westfield; - Energy and Sustainability Statement by Cudd Bentley; - Transport Statement (including Travel Plan, March 2013) by Vectos and; - CIL Information Form by Montagu Evans. 3.0 CONSULTATIONS 3.1 The application has been advertised by way of 6 x site notices (dated 24/05/13) and a newspaper press release (dated 24/05/13). Letters of notification were sent to 386 adjacent properties including properties within the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC). One response has been received objecting to the application but did not set out the planning grounds for the objection. Shepherd's Bush Town Centre Manager: No response: Hammersmith and Fulham Access and Disability Forum: No response Transport for London: No objections to the proposals subject to provision of financial infrastructure contribution towards White City Opportunity Area, provision of cycle safety measures and travel plans. Further comments incorporated into Transport and Parking section in the main body of this report. Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC): No response The following tenants and residents associations have been consulted: McFarlane Road, Wood Lane Residents, Wood Lane Tenants, White City Community Group, White City Neighbourhood Forum, White City Residents and Edward Woods Estate Residents: No responses have been received at the date of writing the report. Hammersmith Society: No objections raised to proposals.
Page 1 and 2: London Borough Of Hammersmith & Ful
Page 3 and 4: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 5 and 6: with Borough Wide Strategic Policy
Page 7 and 8: 14) To submit details of a permanen
Page 9 and 10: minutes walk to Fulham Town Centre.
Page 11 and 12: • Raised a number of queries rela
Page 13 and 14: 5.12 Although most applications for
Page 15 and 16: western boundary will be retained a
Page 17 and 18: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 19 and 20: Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 21 and 22: Applicant: Westfield Shoppingtowns
Page 23 and 24: Policies DM G1, DM G3 and DM H10 of
Page 25 and 26: egeneration of the White City area
Page 27: 1.3 Ariel Way and the White City In
Page 31 and 32: Sustainability and Energy Access No
Page 33 and 34: viability. The expansion of Net-a-P
Page 35 and 36: 4.28 The appearance of the scheme h
Page 37 and 38: combined with the retail and leisur
Page 39 and 40: Car Parking 4.57 A total of 4,500 c
Page 41 and 42: that developments which are located
Page 43 and 44: contribute to the wider Opportunity
Page 45 and 46: Applicant: The Governing Body Pope
Page 47 and 48: In order that the Council may be sa
Page 49 and 50: hours of use; the number and times
Page 51 and 52: To ensure that the amenity of occup
Page 53 and 54: Management of Land Contamination (D
Page 55 and 56: 39) The use of the replacement Fati
Page 57 and 58: 6. Access and Crime Prevention: Sub
Page 59 and 60: part of an informal consultation pr
Page 61 and 62: ii) The design and impact of the pr
Page 63 and 64: dioceses to discourage free use of
Page 65 and 66: structures that make a positive con
Page 67 and 68: at first floor level, with the majo
Page 69 and 70: HIGHWAYS and PARKING 3.33 The NPPF
Page 71 and 72: document that should be annually re
Page 73 and 74: levy is set at £0 per square metre
Page 75 and 76: Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 77 and 78: of any proposed storage enclosure,
Page 79 and 80:
17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 81 and 82:
25) No development shall commence u
Page 83 and 84:
30) The sports pitches/courts hereb
Page 85 and 86:
Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 87 and 88:
2.3 The Football Association (FA) h
Page 89 and 90:
- Large facility surrounded by 3m f
Page 91 and 92:
applicants state that small-sided f
Page 93 and 94:
3.12 It is noted that the existing
Page 95 and 96:
it is appropriate for the intended
Page 97 and 98:
was proposed by the applicant that
Page 99 and 100:
collection arrangements, including
Page 101 and 102:
4.0 CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATION
Page 103 and 104:
Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 105 and 106:
4 Wolfe House Australia Road White
Page 107 and 108:
Applicant: Fruition Properties C/O
Page 109 and 110:
to occupation of the development he
Page 111 and 112:
17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 113 and 114:
Contamination (Defra 2004) or the c
Page 115 and 116:
At least one of the proposed spaces
Page 117 and 118:
unacceptable noise and disturbance
Page 119 and 120:
2.0 PUBLICITY AND CONSULTATIONS 2.1
Page 121 and 122:
3.5 In this instance, the Class B8
Page 123 and 124:
ack from the frontage. In relation
Page 125 and 126:
additional loss of privacy to Court
Page 127 and 128:
which is in accordance with the Cou
Page 129 and 130:
on its merits and reach a decision
Page 131 and 132:
Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
Page 133 and 134:
8) The development shall not commen
Page 135 and 136:
To ensure a satisfactory external a
Page 137 and 138:
are caused to humans, controlled wa
Page 139 and 140:
the council. The approved details s
Page 141 and 142:
Neighbour Comments: Letters from: D
Page 143 and 144:
3.0 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 The
Page 145 and 146:
3.10 and 3.11; b) affordable housin
Page 147 and 148:
of the desirability of sustaining a
Page 149 and 150:
3.33 All units would be built to Li
Page 151 and 152:
HIGHWAYS MATTERS Car parking and tr
Page 153 and 154:
including the incorporation of sust
Page 155 and 156:
3.70 The scheme has been assessed f
Page 157 and 158:
Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
show all

Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?