Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes
Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes
Justification for Approving the Application: 1) 1. Demolition: The proposal represents a high quality landscaping scheme which would enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area. The development is therefore considered to be acceptable in accordance with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 and 7.8 of the London Plan (2011) and policy BE1 of the Core Strategy and Polices DM G7, DM G1 and DM E4 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013). 2. Design: The proposal represents a high quality development which would make a positive contribution to the public realm and enhances the character and appearance of the conservation area. The development is therefore considered to be acceptable in accordance with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 and 7.8 of the London Plan (2011) and policy BE1 of the Core Strategy and Polices DM G7, DM G1 and DM E4 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013) 3. Flood Risk: A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has been submitted and has considered risks of flooding to the site and adequate preventative measures have been identified and secured. The development is therefore considered to be acceptable in accordance with the NPPF and London Plan Policy 5.12 and Core Strategy Policies CC1 and CC2. 4. Temporary loss of housing (including affordable housing): Although London Plan Policy 3.14 seeks to retain existing housing in London, London Plan Policy 3.4 seeks to optimise housing potential. In this regard the quality of the existing housing on site is poor and redevelopment of the Site would enable the provision of better quality, fit for purpose housing whilst optimising the potential of the site which has been indentified in the SHLAA as having potential for an approximate 50% increase in capacity. Increasing the density on site would be more sustainable in line with the objectives of the NPPF. The demolition would assist and accelerate a future housing scheme coming forward in 2014 and the Council have sufficient comfort from the advanced stage of the Council's JV programme that this will occur. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2000 LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS All Background Papers held by Michael Merrington (Ext: 3453): Application form received: 24th June 2013 Drawing Nos: see above Policy documents: The London Plan 2011 Core Strategy 2011 Development Management Local Plan July 2013 Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document July 2013
Consultation Comments: Comments from: English Heritage London Region Fulham Society Dated: 10.07.13 03.07.13 Neighbour Comments: Letters from: Dated: See 2013/02622/FUL for full Officer's report
- Page 1 and 2: London Borough Of Hammersmith & Ful
- Page 3 and 4: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
- Page 5 and 6: with Borough Wide Strategic Policy
- Page 7 and 8: 14) To submit details of a permanen
- Page 9 and 10: minutes walk to Fulham Town Centre.
- Page 11 and 12: • Raised a number of queries rela
- Page 13 and 14: 5.12 Although most applications for
- Page 15 and 16: western boundary will be retained a
- Page 17: Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
- Page 21 and 22: Applicant: Westfield Shoppingtowns
- Page 23 and 24: Policies DM G1, DM G3 and DM H10 of
- Page 25 and 26: egeneration of the White City area
- Page 27 and 28: 1.3 Ariel Way and the White City In
- Page 29 and 30: 2.3 The proposed extension will mir
- Page 31 and 32: Sustainability and Energy Access No
- Page 33 and 34: viability. The expansion of Net-a-P
- Page 35 and 36: 4.28 The appearance of the scheme h
- Page 37 and 38: combined with the retail and leisur
- Page 39 and 40: Car Parking 4.57 A total of 4,500 c
- Page 41 and 42: that developments which are located
- Page 43 and 44: contribute to the wider Opportunity
- Page 45 and 46: Applicant: The Governing Body Pope
- Page 47 and 48: In order that the Council may be sa
- Page 49 and 50: hours of use; the number and times
- Page 51 and 52: To ensure that the amenity of occup
- Page 53 and 54: Management of Land Contamination (D
- Page 55 and 56: 39) The use of the replacement Fati
- Page 57 and 58: 6. Access and Crime Prevention: Sub
- Page 59 and 60: part of an informal consultation pr
- Page 61 and 62: ii) The design and impact of the pr
- Page 63 and 64: dioceses to discourage free use of
- Page 65 and 66: structures that make a positive con
- Page 67 and 68: at first floor level, with the majo
Justification for Approving the Application:<br />
1) 1. Demolition: The proposal represents a high quality l<strong>and</strong>scaping scheme which<br />
would enhance the character <strong>and</strong> appearance of the conservation area. The<br />
development is therefore considered to be acceptable in accordance with Policies<br />
7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 <strong>and</strong> 7.8 of the London Plan (2011) <strong>and</strong> policy BE1 of the<br />
Core Strategy <strong>and</strong> Polices DM G7, DM G1 <strong>and</strong> DM E4 of the Development<br />
Management Local Plan (2013).<br />
2. Design: The proposal represents a high quality development which would make<br />
a positive contribution to the public realm <strong>and</strong> enhances the character <strong>and</strong><br />
appearance of the conservation area. The development is therefore considered to<br />
be acceptable in accordance with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 <strong>and</strong> 7.8 of the<br />
London Plan (2011) <strong>and</strong> policy BE1 of the Core Strategy <strong>and</strong> Polices DM G7, DM<br />
G1 <strong>and</strong> DM E4 of the Development Management Local Plan (2013)<br />
3. Flood Risk: A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has been submitted <strong>and</strong> has<br />
considered risks of flooding to the site <strong>and</strong> adequate preventative measures have<br />
been identified <strong>and</strong> secured. The development is therefore considered to be<br />
acceptable in accordance with the NPPF <strong>and</strong> London Plan Policy 5.12 <strong>and</strong> Core<br />
Strategy Policies CC1 <strong>and</strong> CC2.<br />
4. Temporary loss of housing (including affordable housing): Although London<br />
Plan Policy 3.14 seeks to retain existing housing in London, London Plan Policy<br />
3.4 seeks to optimise housing potential. In this regard the quality of the existing<br />
housing on site is poor <strong>and</strong> redevelopment of the Site would enable the provision<br />
of better quality, fit for purpose housing whilst optimising the potential of the site<br />
which has been indentified in the SHLAA as having potential for an approximate<br />
50% increase in capacity. Increasing the density on site would be more<br />
sustainable in line with the objectives of the NPPF. The demolition would assist<br />
<strong>and</strong> accelerate a future housing scheme coming forward in 2014 <strong>and</strong> the Council<br />
have sufficient comfort from the advanced stage of the Council's JV programme<br />
that this will occur.<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2000<br />
LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS<br />
All Background Papers held by Michael Merrington (Ext: 3453):<br />
Application form received: 24th June 2013<br />
Drawing Nos: see above<br />
Policy documents: The London Plan 2011<br />
Core Strategy 2011<br />
Development Management Local Plan July 2013<br />
<strong>Planning</strong> Guidance Supplementary <strong>Planning</strong> Document July 2013
Change language