Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

satisfactory cycle space is provided for all developments. Secure storage for fourteen bicycles would be provided for the flats, and the houses would have two spaces each in the ground floor patio area. This provision is more than what would normally be expected, which would be twelve cycle parking spaces for a development of this size. A condition is proposed to ensure the cycle storage is implemented before the development is occupied and is maintained for the life of the development (condition no.12). The proposal is thereby considered to be in accordance with the above policies. 3.53 Access to the existing spaces will not be possible during the redevelopment of the site. The applicants have proposed that the existing users of the car parking spaces would be eligible for the period of the development to obtain a temporary on-street car parking permit. The specific details of how this would be controlled would be covered by the submission of a car parking management plan (condition 30). Refuse storage 3.54 London Plan Policy 5.16 outlines the Mayor's approach to waste management. Core Strategy Policy CC3, and policy DM H5 sets out the Councils Waste Management guidance, requiring development to incorporate suitable facilities for the storage and collection of segregated waste. 3.55 The houses and ground floor flats have their own dedicated waste storage areas within their patios, and refuse storage space would be provided for all refuse generated by the other flats at ground floor level on the eastern side of the development . Officers are satisfied that there is sufficient space within the development for the satisfactory storage of refuse. However, a condition is proposed to ensure the full details of refuse storage and to ensure that the approved details are implemented before the use is occupied and is maintained for the life of the development (condition no. 11). Impact of building works 3.56 A Demolition Management Plan (DMP), a Construction Management Plan (CMP) and Construction Logistics Plan (CLP) would be required to ensure that there is no harmful impact on neighbours and on the local highways network. The DMP and CMP shall include demolition details, contractors' construction method statements, waste classification and disposal procedures and locations, dust and noise monitoring and control, provisions within the site to ensure that all vehicles associated with the construction works are properly washed and cleaned to prevent the passage of mud and dirt onto the highway, and other matters relating to traffic management to be agreed. The CLP shall be in accordance with Transport for London (TfL) requirements, which seeks to minimise the impact of construction traffic on nearby roads and restrict construction trips to off peak hours only. These would be secured by condition (no. 03) in accordance with DM LP policies DM H5, DM H8, DM H9, DM H10 and DM H11, and London Plan Policy 6.3. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Flood risk 3.57 The NPPF states that inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding should be avoided by directing development away from areas at highest risk, but where development is necessary, making it safe without increasing flood risk elsewhere. 3.58 London Plan Policy 5.11, 5.12, 5.13, 5.14 and 5.15 requires new development to comply with the flood risk assessment and management requirements of national policy,
including the incorporation of sustainable urban drainage systems, and specifies a drainage hierarchy for new development. 3.59 Policy CC1 of the Core Strategy requires that new development is designed to take account of increasing risks of flooding. Policy CC2 states that new development will be expected to minimise current and future flood risk and that sustainable urban drainage will be expected to be incorporated into new development to reduce the risk of flooding from surface water and foul water. This is supported by Policy DM H3 of the DM LP 2013. 3.60 Although a small part on the edge of the site is located within the Environment Agency's Flood Zones 2 and 3, the majority of the site is in Flood Zone 1 (low risk) as the ground levels of the estate are higher than much of the surrounding area. The River Thames flood defences in this area defend the site to a 1 in 1000 year annual probability of river flooding in any year (
Page 1 and 2:
London Borough Of Hammersmith & Ful
Page 3 and 4:
Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 5 and 6:
with Borough Wide Strategic Policy
Page 7 and 8:
14) To submit details of a permanen
Page 9 and 10:
minutes walk to Fulham Town Centre.
Page 11 and 12:
• Raised a number of queries rela
Page 13 and 14:
5.12 Although most applications for
Page 15 and 16:
western boundary will be retained a
Page 17 and 18:
Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 19 and 20:
Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 21 and 22:
Applicant: Westfield Shoppingtowns
Page 23 and 24:
Policies DM G1, DM G3 and DM H10 of
Page 25 and 26:
egeneration of the White City area
Page 27 and 28:
1.3 Ariel Way and the White City In
Page 29 and 30:
2.3 The proposed extension will mir
Page 31 and 32:
Sustainability and Energy Access No
Page 33 and 34:
viability. The expansion of Net-a-P
Page 35 and 36:
4.28 The appearance of the scheme h
Page 37 and 38:
combined with the retail and leisur
Page 39 and 40:
Car Parking 4.57 A total of 4,500 c
Page 41 and 42:
that developments which are located
Page 43 and 44:
contribute to the wider Opportunity
Page 45 and 46:
Applicant: The Governing Body Pope
Page 47 and 48:
In order that the Council may be sa
Page 49 and 50:
hours of use; the number and times
Page 51 and 52:
To ensure that the amenity of occup
Page 53 and 54:
Management of Land Contamination (D
Page 55 and 56:
39) The use of the replacement Fati
Page 57 and 58:
6. Access and Crime Prevention: Sub
Page 59 and 60:
part of an informal consultation pr
Page 61 and 62:
ii) The design and impact of the pr
Page 63 and 64:
dioceses to discourage free use of
Page 65 and 66:
structures that make a positive con
Page 67 and 68:
at first floor level, with the majo
Page 69 and 70:
HIGHWAYS and PARKING 3.33 The NPPF
Page 71 and 72:
document that should be annually re
Page 73 and 74:
levy is set at £0 per square metre
Page 75 and 76:
Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 77 and 78:
of any proposed storage enclosure,
Page 79 and 80:
17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 81 and 82:
25) No development shall commence u
Page 83 and 84:
30) The sports pitches/courts hereb
Page 85 and 86:
Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 87 and 88:
2.3 The Football Association (FA) h
Page 89 and 90:
- Large facility surrounded by 3m f
Page 91 and 92:
applicants state that small-sided f
Page 93 and 94:
3.12 It is noted that the existing
Page 95 and 96:
it is appropriate for the intended
Page 97 and 98:
was proposed by the applicant that
Page 99 and 100:
collection arrangements, including
Page 101 and 102: 4.0 CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATION
Page 103 and 104: Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 105 and 106: 4 Wolfe House Australia Road White
Page 107 and 108: Applicant: Fruition Properties C/O
Page 109 and 110: to occupation of the development he
Page 111 and 112: 17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 113 and 114: Contamination (Defra 2004) or the c
Page 115 and 116: At least one of the proposed spaces
Page 117 and 118: unacceptable noise and disturbance
Page 119 and 120: 2.0 PUBLICITY AND CONSULTATIONS 2.1
Page 121 and 122: 3.5 In this instance, the Class B8
Page 123 and 124: ack from the frontage. In relation
Page 125 and 126: additional loss of privacy to Court
Page 127 and 128: which is in accordance with the Cou
Page 129 and 130: on its merits and reach a decision
Page 131 and 132: Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
Page 133 and 134: 8) The development shall not commen
Page 135 and 136: To ensure a satisfactory external a
Page 137 and 138: are caused to humans, controlled wa
Page 139 and 140: the council. The approved details s
Page 141 and 142: Neighbour Comments: Letters from: D
Page 143 and 144: 3.0 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 The
Page 145 and 146: 3.10 and 3.11; b) affordable housin
Page 147 and 148: of the desirability of sustaining a
Page 149 and 150: 3.33 All units would be built to Li
Page 151: HIGHWAYS MATTERS Car parking and tr
Page 155 and 156: 3.70 The scheme has been assessed f
Page 157 and 158: Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
show all

Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?