Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

lue badge holders, have no entitlement to parking permits from the council and to ensure that occupiers are informed, prior to occupation, of such restriction. The development shall not be used otherwise than in accordance with the approved scheme unless prior written agreement is issued by the council. In order that the prospective occupiers of the units are made aware of the fact that they will not be entitled to an on-street car parking permit, in the interests of the proper management of parking, and to ensure that the development does not harm the existing amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties by adding to the already high level of on-street car parking stress in the area, in accordance with policies DM J1 and DM J2 of the Development Management Local Plan 2013. 29) The development hereby permitted shall not be occupied until such time as a scheme has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority to ensure that all occupiers, other than those with disabilities who are blue badge holders, have no entitlement to parking permits from the council and to ensure that occupiers are informed, prior to occupation, of such restriction. The development shall not be used otherwise than in accordance with the approved scheme unless prior written agreement is issued by the council. In order that the prospective occupiers of the flats are made aware of the fact that they will not be entitled to an on-street car parking permit, in the interests of the proper management of parking, and to ensure that the development does not harm the existing amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties by adding to the already high level of on-street car parking stress in the area, in accordance with policies DM J1 and DM J2 of the Development Management Local Plan 2013. 30) The development shall not commence until a car parking management plan has been submitted to and approved in writing by the council. This shall provide details of where existing tenants with a right to park within the development site would be able to park during the implementation of the planning approval; and a strategy to ensure that the approved details are implemented for the duration of the works. In order to ensure that existing tenants who have a right to park within the site are not disadvantaged by the redevelopment and have facilities to park adjacent to, or within reasonable distance of, the site, in accordance with policy DM J2 of the Development Management Local Plan 2013. 31) Prior to the development hereby approved being occupied, full details of the screening proposed for the roof terraces including fixings, and samples, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council. The use of the terraces shall not commence until the screens as approved have been installed and they shall be permanently retained thereafter. In order to ensure a satisfactory external appearance and ensure no overlooking or loss of privacy in accordance with Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document 2013 - Housing Policy 8. 32) The development shall not commence until a car parking management plan, including allocation of spaces, has been submitted to and approved in writing by
the council. The approved details shall be retained thereafter for the lifetime of the development. In order to ensure that parking is adequately controlled within the development, in accordance with policy DM J2 of the Development Management Local Plan 2013. Justification for Approving the Application: 1) 1. Land Use: The proposed development would achieve a sustainable development with efficient use of brownfield land. The proposal would provide a mix of family and non family units and contribute to much needed additional affordable housing, in accordance with Core Strategy Policies H1 and H2, London Plan Policies 3.3 B, 3.11, 3.12 and 3.13, and policies DM A1 and A3 of the Development Management Local Plan 2013. 2. Housing mix: The proposed development would contribute too much needed additional housing, and would help the borough meet its housing targets, in accordance with London Plan Policies 3.3 and 3.4. The proposed tenure, which would comprise of six intermediate and four market housing units at this site is considered acceptable. In the context of London Plan policies, the tenure mix is considered to be acceptable, taking into account the objectives of encouraging residential development, and the individual circumstances of the site. In this respect no objection is raised under London Plan Policy 3.3B. The housing brought forward by the development would also be an appropriate mix having regard to the objective of securing family and non family units in accordance with DM LP 2013 policies DM A1 and DM A3, together with Core Strategy H4. The internal design and layout of the new residential units are considered satisfactory having regard to Mayors Design Guidelines, and London Plan Policy 3.5 and table 3.3, together with policies DM A2 and DM A9 of the Development Management Local Plan 2013. 3. Density: The proposal is of an acceptable density which would optimise the potential of the site and would be compatible with the local character and context and with public transport capacity. The proposal thereby satisfies London Plan Policy 3.4, Core Strategy H3 and policy DM A2 of the Development Management Local Plan 2013. 4. Design: The development is considered to comply with Development Management Local Plan 2013 Policies DM G1, DM G7 and Core Strategy 2011 Policy BE1, which requires a high standard of design in all developments, compatible with the scale and character of existing development and its setting, and London Plan policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 which seek a high quality in design and architecture, requiring new developments to have regard to the pattern and grain of existing development. The proposal would preserve and enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area in accordance with the policies detailed above. 5. Residential Amenity: The impact of the proposed development upon adjoining occupiers is considered acceptable. The proposal would not have an unacceptably harmful impact on neighbouring residential amenity in terms of light, outlook or privacy and noise and disturbance. In this regard, the development would respect the principles of good neighbourliness, and would therefore be
Page 1 and 2:
London Borough Of Hammersmith & Ful
Page 3 and 4:
Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 5 and 6:
with Borough Wide Strategic Policy
Page 7 and 8:
14) To submit details of a permanen
Page 9 and 10:
minutes walk to Fulham Town Centre.
Page 11 and 12:
• Raised a number of queries rela
Page 13 and 14:
5.12 Although most applications for
Page 15 and 16:
western boundary will be retained a
Page 17 and 18:
Applicant: LBHF Mr Neil Kirby 3rd F
Page 19 and 20:
Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 21 and 22:
Applicant: Westfield Shoppingtowns
Page 23 and 24:
Policies DM G1, DM G3 and DM H10 of
Page 25 and 26:
egeneration of the White City area
Page 27 and 28:
1.3 Ariel Way and the White City In
Page 29 and 30:
2.3 The proposed extension will mir
Page 31 and 32:
Sustainability and Energy Access No
Page 33 and 34:
viability. The expansion of Net-a-P
Page 35 and 36:
4.28 The appearance of the scheme h
Page 37 and 38:
combined with the retail and leisur
Page 39 and 40:
Car Parking 4.57 A total of 4,500 c
Page 41 and 42:
that developments which are located
Page 43 and 44:
contribute to the wider Opportunity
Page 45 and 46:
Applicant: The Governing Body Pope
Page 47 and 48:
In order that the Council may be sa
Page 49 and 50:
hours of use; the number and times
Page 51 and 52:
To ensure that the amenity of occup
Page 53 and 54:
Management of Land Contamination (D
Page 55 and 56:
39) The use of the replacement Fati
Page 57 and 58:
6. Access and Crime Prevention: Sub
Page 59 and 60:
part of an informal consultation pr
Page 61 and 62:
ii) The design and impact of the pr
Page 63 and 64:
dioceses to discourage free use of
Page 65 and 66:
structures that make a positive con
Page 67 and 68:
at first floor level, with the majo
Page 69 and 70:
HIGHWAYS and PARKING 3.33 The NPPF
Page 71 and 72:
document that should be annually re
Page 73 and 74:
levy is set at £0 per square metre
Page 75 and 76:
Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 77 and 78:
of any proposed storage enclosure,
Page 79 and 80:
17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 81 and 82:
25) No development shall commence u
Page 83 and 84:
30) The sports pitches/courts hereb
Page 85 and 86:
Consultation Comments: Comments fro
Page 87 and 88: 2.3 The Football Association (FA) h
Page 89 and 90: - Large facility surrounded by 3m f
Page 91 and 92: applicants state that small-sided f
Page 93 and 94: 3.12 It is noted that the existing
Page 95 and 96: it is appropriate for the intended
Page 97 and 98: was proposed by the applicant that
Page 99 and 100: collection arrangements, including
Page 101 and 102: 4.0 CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATION
Page 103 and 104: Applicant: Mr S Bennett C/o The Spo
Page 105 and 106: 4 Wolfe House Australia Road White
Page 107 and 108: Applicant: Fruition Properties C/O
Page 109 and 110: to occupation of the development he
Page 111 and 112: 17) Prior to commencement of the de
Page 113 and 114: Contamination (Defra 2004) or the c
Page 115 and 116: At least one of the proposed spaces
Page 117 and 118: unacceptable noise and disturbance
Page 119 and 120: 2.0 PUBLICITY AND CONSULTATIONS 2.1
Page 121 and 122: 3.5 In this instance, the Class B8
Page 123 and 124: ack from the frontage. In relation
Page 125 and 126: additional loss of privacy to Court
Page 127 and 128: which is in accordance with the Cou
Page 129 and 130: on its merits and reach a decision
Page 131 and 132: Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
Page 133 and 134: 8) The development shall not commen
Page 135 and 136: To ensure a satisfactory external a
Page 137: are caused to humans, controlled wa
Page 141 and 142: Neighbour Comments: Letters from: D
Page 143 and 144: 3.0 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 The
Page 145 and 146: 3.10 and 3.11; b) affordable housin
Page 147 and 148: of the desirability of sustaining a
Page 149 and 150: 3.33 All units would be built to Li
Page 151 and 152: HIGHWAYS MATTERS Car parking and tr
Page 153 and 154: including the incorporation of sust
Page 155 and 156: 3.70 The scheme has been assessed f
Page 157 and 158: Applicant: Mr Eric Holroyd Housing
show all

Planning Applications PDF 1 MB - Meetings, agendas and minutes

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?