12.05.2015 Views

Zmena klímy – možný dopad (nielen) na obyvateľstvo - Prohuman

Zmena klímy – možný dopad (nielen) na obyvateľstvo - Prohuman

Zmena klímy – možný dopad (nielen) na obyvateľstvo - Prohuman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ESD is still developing as a broad and comprehensive concept, encompassing interrelated<br />

environmental, economic and social issues. Environmental education<br />

should be elaborated and complemented with other fields of education in an integrative<br />

approach towards education for sustai<strong>na</strong>ble development. Addressing<br />

such divers themes in ESD requires a holistic approach. ESD should foster respect<br />

for and understanding of different cultures and embrace contributions from them.<br />

Traditio<strong>na</strong>l knowledge should be valued and conserved as an integral part of ESD.<br />

Learners at all levels should be encouraged to use systemic, critical and creative<br />

thinking and reflection in both local and global contexts; these are prerequisites<br />

for action for sustai<strong>na</strong>ble development. ESD should take into account diverse local,<br />

<strong>na</strong>tio<strong>na</strong>l and regio<strong>na</strong>l circumstances as well as the global context, seeking<br />

a balance between global and local interests. Addressing the ethical dimension,<br />

including … is central to sustai<strong>na</strong>ble development and, therefore, vital for ESD.<br />

Responsibility is inherent in ethics and becomes a practical matter for ESD. Formal<br />

ESD should be permeated by experience of life and work beyond the classroom.<br />

ESD requires multi-stakeholder cooperation and partnership. ESD should therefore<br />

be recognized for its contribution to interactive and integrated policy- and<br />

decision-making.<br />

The role of education for sustai<strong>na</strong>ble development<br />

in shifting to a green economy<br />

The economic paradigm of greening the economy, against the background of multiple<br />

crises and accelerating resource scarcity, has gained paramount prominence<br />

in regio<strong>na</strong>l and inter<strong>na</strong>tio<strong>na</strong>l sustai<strong>na</strong>ble development processes. It was a key theme<br />

at the United Nations Conference on Sustai<strong>na</strong>ble Development held in Rio de<br />

Janeiro in June 2012 (Rio+20).<br />

The working definition of UNEP describes a “green economy as one that results<br />

in improved human well-being and social equity, while significantly reducing<br />

environmental risks and ecological scarcities. In its simplest expression, a green<br />

economy can be thought of as one which is low carbon, resource efficient and socially<br />

inclusive.” (UNEP, GEI) While the importance of promoting a green economy<br />

is widely supported regio<strong>na</strong>lly and globally, there is no universal agreement on the<br />

definition of what a green economy entails. At the regio<strong>na</strong>l level, the relevant substantive<br />

document for the Seventh “Environment for Europe” Ministerial Conference<br />

states that, in order to achieve a green, inclusive and competitive economy<br />

in the UNECE region, a comprehensive policy mix will be needed. The policy mix<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!