concept for more efficient support of the arts in 2007–2013 - Divadlo.cz
concept for more efficient support of the arts in 2007–2013 - Divadlo.cz
concept for more efficient support of the arts in 2007–2013 - Divadlo.cz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Effect on <strong>the</strong> State Budget<br />
In <strong>2007–2013</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimated impact on <strong>the</strong> state budget <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> programme f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>support</strong><strong>in</strong>g development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sphere <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>arts</strong> and ensur<strong>in</strong>g access to <strong>the</strong> <strong>arts</strong> <strong>for</strong> all<br />
citizens <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic is a total sum <strong>of</strong> 1.729,05 mil. Czk.<br />
Coverage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Concept’s fund<strong>in</strong>g requirements will be <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> State Budget<br />
Proposal and <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Culture’s budget chapter 334 <strong>for</strong> 2007, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g mid-term<br />
outlooks <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> expenditure limits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state budget and <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
On 14 th March 2006 <strong>the</strong> document was submitted <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-departmental comment procedure<br />
to all members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government, regional chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficers, <strong>the</strong> Lord Mayor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
City <strong>of</strong> Prague, <strong>the</strong> Union <strong>of</strong> Towns and Municipalities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic, and selected pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
associations; <strong>the</strong>ir views and <strong>the</strong> settlements are conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part IV <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> document.<br />
Settlements to <strong>the</strong> comments were reached and <strong>the</strong> document is submitted <strong>in</strong> contradiction <strong>of</strong><br />
only one comment, that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance request<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> omission from <strong>the</strong> proposed<br />
resolution Po<strong>in</strong>t II e) on cooperation between <strong>the</strong> 1 st Deputy Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
and <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong> secur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> requisite f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources <strong>for</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
Concept, given that <strong>the</strong> Concept must be implemented with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>of</strong> approved budgets<br />
and <strong>the</strong> mid-term outlooks <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> relevant years.<br />
The percentage <strong>of</strong> expenditures relegated <strong>for</strong> cultural activities out <strong>of</strong> total expenditures<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry’s approved budget <strong>for</strong> 2006 is 5.74%, and that is <strong>the</strong> highest amount out <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />
programmes and programme areas. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it is not enough to provide <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> tasks aris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> submitted Concept <strong>for</strong> More Efficient Support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Arts <strong>in</strong> <strong>2007–2013</strong>. The second<br />
largest percentage is <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Programme <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conservation <strong>of</strong> Architectural Heritage<br />
(5.21%). The percentages <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r programmes out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry’s total expenditures are<br />
substantially lower (Programme <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Regeneration <strong>of</strong> Urban Conservation Areas and Urban<br />
Conservation Zones 2.54%, Integrated System <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conservation <strong>of</strong> Movable Cultural Heritage<br />
1.78%, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs receive less than one percent).<br />
The M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Culture disagrees, as each year it submits its requirements with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> standard budget procedure <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g expenditures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget chapter <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Culture, especially targeted expenditures on programmes and programme areas.<br />
Never<strong>the</strong>less it has not been possible to achieve an <strong>in</strong>crease from <strong>the</strong> previous year <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> target<br />
figure <strong>for</strong> chapter expenditures. Ow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> relative reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> target figure and given<br />
<strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> first cover<strong>in</strong>g mandatory expenditures, <strong>the</strong> expenditures on programmes and<br />
programme areas are decreas<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
When draw<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>the</strong> budget <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> next budget year <strong>the</strong> MC must first secure resources<br />
<strong>for</strong> so-called mandatory expenditures:<br />
• The personnel costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> governmental organisations under <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Culture,<br />
authorities, churches, and religious organisations<br />
• Expenditures on research and development<br />
• Material expenses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> governmental organisations under <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Culture, authorities,<br />
churches, and religious organisations, and <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong><br />
churches and religious organisations<br />
• Expenditures on asset renewal – ISPROFIN programme f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
These expenditures represent a substantial portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry’s budget. The percentage<br />
<strong>the</strong>se expenditures constitute <strong>in</strong> relation to total expenditures is grow<strong>in</strong>g; <strong>for</strong> example, <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> approved budget <strong>for</strong> 2003 <strong>the</strong>y comprised 65.67% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total budget, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> approved<br />
budget <strong>for</strong> 2006 <strong>the</strong> figure is 80.40%. This means that expenditures on programme areas represent<br />
a decreas<strong>in</strong>g percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry’s total expenditures; <strong>for</strong> example, <strong>the</strong>se expenditures<br />
accounted <strong>for</strong> 34.33% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total budget and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> approved budget <strong>for</strong> 2006 <strong>the</strong> figure is<br />
19.60%. Ow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> target figure, o<strong>the</strong>r documents approved by<br />
<strong>the</strong> Government are un<strong>for</strong>tunately not be<strong>in</strong>g successfully fulfilled, such as <strong>the</strong> Concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Development <strong>of</strong> Libraries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic <strong>for</strong> 2004–2010, <strong>the</strong> Concept <strong>for</strong> More Effective<br />
Conservation <strong>of</strong> Traditional Folk Culture, or <strong>the</strong> Programmes <strong>of</strong> State Support <strong>for</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
Theatres and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Symphony Orchestras and Choirs, and Support <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Acquisition<br />
Work <strong>of</strong> Museums and Galleries, set up by <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Culture <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> years 2004–2008.<br />
12<br />
13