16.11.2012 Views

Hi-Country Estates II HOA Annual Meeting Minutes Monday, June 7 ...

Hi-Country Estates II HOA Annual Meeting Minutes Monday, June 7 ...

Hi-Country Estates II HOA Annual Meeting Minutes Monday, June 7 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Attendance:<br />

Tony Sarra, Vice President & Legal<br />

Arlene Johnson, Director, Roads<br />

Greg Brown, Director, Community Affairs<br />

Libby Wilson, Treasurer<br />

Jack Darton, Secretary<br />

Topics of discussion and consideration:<br />

<strong>Hi</strong>-<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Estates</strong> <strong>II</strong> <strong>HOA</strong><br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Minutes</strong><br />

<strong>Monday</strong>, <strong>June</strong> 7, 2009 7:06 P.M.<br />

Herriman City Hall<br />

13011 S. Pioneer Street<br />

Herriman, UT 84096<br />

Not Approved<br />

Jeff Fitzmayer, Munitions Response<br />

Robert Price, Munitions Response<br />

Deanna Hopkins (and team), Questar Gas<br />

Approx. 105 HC<strong>II</strong> Real Estate Owners<br />

• Welcome – Tony Sarra welcomed the group and provided the agenda. He introduced the <strong>HOA</strong> officers. He explained<br />

that we will not be able to discuss certain topics because notice of a law suit that has been filed against the association.<br />

• <strong>Minutes</strong> from last year -- Jack Darton announced that the minutes from last year’s meeting will not be read this year in the<br />

interest of time. The minutes were distributed to those in attendance. Arlene Johnson moved to accept the minutes.<br />

Kevin Bogdonow seconded the motion. The motion carried without objection.<br />

• Financials<br />

o Libby Wilson reviewed the year-to-date financial reports for both general funds and water funds. Jaron Taylor<br />

asked about consulting and engineering expenses incurred. Tony Sarra explained that those expenses are<br />

related to water right sales, build-out estimates, and system upgrades such as pumps. Jaron Taylor asked what<br />

the $40,000 in legal fees is from. Tony Sarra answered that it is from various legal actions of past due<br />

assessments. The two major expenses for water are to plan for future build out and to prepare for the water<br />

rights sale. Lindsay Atwood mentions that last year, we spent nearly $40,000 as well, but it was offset by<br />

collection of legal fees. Tom Souvall asked why our legal council was changed for the recent law suit. Tony<br />

Sarra explained that we have retained our general council and the insurance company has hired their own to<br />

manage the new case.<br />

o Libby Wilson read the 2010-2011 budget for the general fund and water fund. Bill Souvall asked if we are going<br />

to approve the budget. Tony Sarra answered, “No”. He explained that the budget is set by the board.<br />

• Munitions response -- Jeff Fitzmayer and Robert Price presented some information about the munitions response<br />

program. About 40% of land owners have granted permission to inspect their lots. He explained that Camp Williams was<br />

established in the early 1900’s and mistakes have likely been made over that time that may have left munitions in the <strong>Hi</strong>-<br />

<strong>Country</strong> area. Mr. Fitzmeyer explained that they will run detectors over the area. Tom Souvall asked how they will get<br />

through heavy brush. Mr. Fitmeyer showed pictures of dense brush after it had been minimally thinned. The detection<br />

will be performed in a 300’ grid to find metal fragments that may be spread around an impact site. He reminded the<br />

audience to be precautious about munitions if they are found. Mr. Fitzmeyer says that the procedure should have a 95%<br />

success rate. In 1991, some troops did a visual search for munitions without using any instruments. Not all parcels in <strong>Hi</strong>-<br />

<strong>Country</strong> estates will be investigated. Parcel owners will be informed when their lot has been cleared. They will also<br />

sample soil if anything is found. They are focused on finding target areas, not necessarily stray rounds.<br />

• Propositions A & B – Tom Chace read a statement regarding property development.<br />

o Barriers include Sewer, FCOZ, and Roads. Tom is committed to finding the solution to all three barriers.<br />

o He claims that the board has impeded development and has not remained neutral. He says the board has denied<br />

responsibility for development of anything other than roads and water despite the phrase “other public services”<br />

being in the governing documents. He adds that the board has manipulated the rules to serve their own interests.<br />

o He says the board has distributed slanderous and libelous accusations against him. He sent a five page letter to<br />

all <strong>HOA</strong> members on May 6 to clarify his position.<br />

o Tom Reports, “Last year, the board was offered the chance to settle the litigation and all they had to do is help us<br />

to annex into Herriman.” Several members of the audience exclaimed their objection to annexation. He<br />

continued, “They said they had to remain neutral and it’s up to the property rights group.”<br />

o Tom has been in negotiation with Herriman to annex in such a way that all lots will be buildable. He claims that<br />

his negotiations would cause Herriman to take over HC<strong>II</strong> infrastructure and remove FCOZ and other questionable<br />

zoning requirements. He claims that the board has sabotaged his efforts. He also claims to be the legal contact<br />

for annexation with Herriman and the board inappropriately became involved.<br />

o Tom would like to see the <strong>HOA</strong> and the ACC dissolved. He says most of the items addressed by the ACC are<br />

covered by Herriman’s building code.<br />

o Tom claims that the board was offered money for sewer in 2009 but the board elected not to pursue it. Tom<br />

claims he was sent on a goose chase to secure a sewer study. Meanwhile, the funds disappeared.<br />

o The audience became very unsettled. Tom was upset and sat down.


• Board Response – Tony Sarra responds to portions of Tom Chace’s presentation<br />

o Tony Sarra denied that board has interfered with any negotiations with Herriman regarding annexation. The<br />

board is negotiating the sale of water rights to Herriman and Tom Chace has been discussing some of the same<br />

issues with Herriman’s attorneys. Tom denies the allegation. Tony says it is documented and factual.<br />

o Tony explains the covenants and by-laws are recorded with the title on every property in HC<strong>II</strong> and annexation<br />

does not remove them or the <strong>HOA</strong>.<br />

o Tony says that the board never turned down any money for sewer.<br />

o Mary Jane Pennington asks if a meeting can be arranged with Herriman to get more information on annexation.<br />

Tony read a letter from Herriman Mayor Mills regarding past <strong>Hi</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>II</strong> meetings and future annexation<br />

possibilities. The letter stated that there was a meeting on March 25, 2009 regarding funds that the State had<br />

available to assist in constructing a sewer system in <strong>Hi</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>II</strong>. It was concluded that <strong>Hi</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>II</strong> would work<br />

directly with the Sewer District to decide if property owners would support annexing to the sewer district. The<br />

letter also stated that if <strong>Hi</strong> County <strong>II</strong> annexed, the City would not maintain or improve any roads or the water<br />

system in the <strong>Hi</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Estates</strong> Subdivision unless the funds were generated by <strong>Hi</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>II</strong> residents. It also<br />

stated that if <strong>Hi</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Estates</strong> annexed they would be brought in under the FR zone which has development<br />

restrictions in land areas over 30% grade and it preserves ridgelines. Lenell Chace claims that the details of the<br />

letter are very different from what Herriman communicated with her a few days prior. She claims FR zoning is as<br />

bad as or worse than FCOZ. She suspects that the board is undercutting their work. Tony reminds everyone that<br />

the board will act according to the result of the vote. Lenell asked that we tally all votes by Area and provide<br />

counts rather than just pass/fail. Matt ? mentions that he’d be willing to pay a neighbor’s sewer connection<br />

because he can’t build otherwise. Lindsay Atwood says that we need to find a solution that benefits all parties<br />

involved.<br />

• Proposition D (new) -- Tom Souvall moved that the lots that are unbuildable due to moratorium, sewer, roads, or FCOZ<br />

receive a 50% discount on assessments (subject to legal review) until they are buildable. To receive the discount, you<br />

must bring assessments current. Scott Royall seconded the motion. Votes were collected by casting a hand written<br />

ballot.<br />

• Proposition C – Jack Darton and Deanna Hopkins presented information regarding natural gas. Natural gas costs<br />

approximately half of propane and natural gas prices are less volatile. Installation costs will likely be over $5,000 for the<br />

main line and likely another $5,000 more to connect after considering expenses for service line, appliance conversion,<br />

and inspection.<br />

• Water<br />

o Ted Mickelsen provided information on the engineering study his firm will complete this year.<br />

o Greg Brown provided a status report on the water system. He showed statistics on past usage, a list of projects<br />

completed, and pictures of some of the projects.<br />

o Tom Souvall asked about the water rights sale. Tony Sarra explained that we entered contract with Herriman<br />

because we would forfeit our rights without benefit otherwise. He read a letter from Wendy Bowden Crowther, our<br />

water attorney, that expanded on that point. Tony described some of the factors involved in negotiating the sale<br />

with Herriman.<br />

• Elections<br />

o Director: Tony Sarra (incumbent) and Leilani Vaivaka are up for election as director.<br />

o Secretary: Jack Darton (incumbent) ran unopposed<br />

o Treasurer: Libby Wilson (incumbent) ran unopposed<br />

o ACC: Nancy Bill, Paul Jacobik, Jeff Ohlsen, and Scott Royall introduced themselves. Ingrid Rauter was<br />

nominated by Don Bill, Joel Eberhardt seconded the motion, and she introduced herself.<br />

o Area A Coordinater: Tom Pedersen, Ingrid Rauter<br />

o Area B Coordinater: Nancy Bill, Kristen Ohlsen<br />

o Area C Coordinator:Jaron Taylor, John Andreesen, James Fike<br />

o Area D Coordinator: Charles Calder<br />

• 5 minute break<br />

• Legal<br />

o Tony Sarra stated that information regarding the law suit brought by the property rights committee has been and<br />

will be posted in the HC<strong>II</strong> website, www.hi-country2.com<br />

• Roads<br />

o Arlene Johnson displayed the proportions of cost vs. traffic for each main road in the area.<br />

o $22K was spent on maintenance and $20.6K on snow plowing.<br />

• Member Issues<br />

o Adam Meyers asks that the board adopt standard floor rules to reduce shouting matches.<br />

o Lenell Chace has requested that monthly and annual meeting minutes be published in a timely fashion.<br />

o James Fike asked that we select a larger venue next year.<br />

• Tom Pedersen Moved to close the meeting at 11:12. Holly Saunders seconded the motion. The motion carried without<br />

objection.<br />

Jack Darton<br />

Secretary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!