Endovaskulárne techniky rekanalizácie femoropliteálnych okluzií

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EBM: SIR vs BG • 1076 pacientov s PAO DK 2002 – 2007 • 206 SIR u 190 pacientov • 128 BG u 119 pacientov • Cost-per-QALY (quality-adjusted life year): SIR €5663 vs BG €9172 Clinical Improvement Five-year all cause survival Amputationfree survival Five-year freedom from binary restenosis Five-year freedom from TLR SIR BG p 82.8% 68.2% p=0.106 78.6% 80.1% p=0.734 72.9% 71.2% p=0.976 72.8% 65.3% p=0.700 85.9% 72.1% p=0.262 Five-Year Irish Trial of CLI Patients With TASC II Type C/D Lesions Undergoing Subintimal Angioplasty or Bypass Surgery Based on Plaque EcholucencySherif Sultan et all, J Endovasc Ther. June 2009, Vol. 16, No.3, pp. 270-283
EBM: SIR vs BG Subintimal Angioplasty as a Primary Modality in the Management of Critical Limb Ischemia: Comparison to Bypass Grafting for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease Niamh Hynes, et all, J Endovasc Ther. 2004 Aug;11(4):460-71
Page 1 and 2: Rekanalizácia dlhých femoropoplit
Page 3: Techniky • intraluminálna rekana
Page 6 and 7: Výsledky na SÚSCCH a.s. • 05/20
Page 10: Kazuistika II • 58r. muž, DM II
Page 16: Komplikácie • 73r. žena prijat
Page 19: EBM: SIR vs BG Bypass: zlatý štan
Page 23 and 24: Clinical follow-up in endovascular
Page 25: Záver • EVL je vo fem-pop rieči

Endovaskulárne techniky rekanalizácie femoropliteálnych okluzií

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?