10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76 | Robert P. Kraynak<br />

from God—a comparative rank entitling man to limited dominion<br />

over creatures that is a mirror of God’s total dominion over all<br />

creation. Yet, the divine image can be partially lost, either by the<br />

whole human species, as in the Fall, or by individuals, as a result of<br />

committing murder. In addition to stressing dominion, the passages<br />

from Genesis emphasize procreation, as if procreation were an image<br />

of God’s power of creation—which would explain the reference to<br />

male-female sexual differentiation as part of the divine image <strong>and</strong><br />

the comm<strong>and</strong> to “be fruitful <strong>and</strong> multiply.” Although procreation<br />

enables people to make children in their image—just as God made<br />

Adam in God’s image, so Adam makes Seth in his image—one cannot<br />

be sure if this is the basis of human dignity. For the lower animals<br />

also procreate “according to their kinds” <strong>and</strong> are comm<strong>and</strong>ed to<br />

“be fruitful <strong>and</strong> multiply” (Genesis 1:22). Perhaps the Bible is saying<br />

that procreation with the conscious intention of passing on personal<br />

identity <strong>and</strong> subduing the earth is the divine image in man.<br />

The challenge of Genesis is that it offers a glimpse into human<br />

dignity by referring to the divine image without precisely defining<br />

it. <strong>Dignity</strong> includes man’s superior rank in the created hierarchy; <strong>and</strong><br />

it confers special worth to human life <strong>and</strong> procreation, although the<br />

lifeblood <strong>and</strong> procreation of other animals also receive certain blessings<br />

(as if they too shared in the divine image to some extent). If this<br />

is true, however, what remains of the special dignity of man? The<br />

only answer that makes sense to me is that the lifeblood <strong>and</strong> procreation<br />

which man shares with other animals have a deeper meaning<br />

for the human species: they are pale reflections of something man<br />

alone possessed before the Fall, namely, immortal life. The implication<br />

is that immortality is the lost image of God in man—a suggestion<br />

supported by the account of the Fall, which is primarily about<br />

the loss of immortality, as well as by the longevity of Adam <strong>and</strong> the<br />

early patriarchs, who lived up to 900 years, as a kind of afterglow of<br />

immortality that God finally ended by setting a limit to human life<br />

at 120 years (Genesis 6:3). As compensation for the limited life span<br />

of mortals, the surrogate immortality that Adam gained through his<br />

son Seth continues through the procreation of families <strong>and</strong> tribes<br />

that endure for generations. Man’s dignity, in the sense of original<br />

immortality or surrogate immortality (through children <strong>and</strong> long<br />

life) is therefore a comparative notion since it is the highest degree of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!