10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Mystery of the <strong>Human</strong> Soul | 69<br />

combination of body <strong>and</strong> soul, which are not entirely distinct from<br />

each other because they interact on a regular basis. The body clearly<br />

exists as a substance because it differentiates one individual human<br />

being from another. But the body’s shape is more than the sum of<br />

its parts because it moves together on its own power as an integral<br />

whole, requiring a form united with matter. This is the first meaning<br />

of “soul”: the self-moving power of a body with form that functions<br />

as a unified whole.<br />

In this sense, all animals are a union of body <strong>and</strong> soul because<br />

they move on their own power as integral wholes; <strong>and</strong> this is precisely<br />

Aristotle’s point in his classic work, On the Soul. 14 His thesis is that<br />

“the soul is the first principle of animal life”—meaning, the soul is<br />

the cause of life in living beings. For Aristotle, life is a kind of mystery<br />

because living beings have bodies that move on their own <strong>and</strong><br />

this implies the intangible power of “soul” (anima in Latin; psyche in<br />

Greek). The puzzle is that the soul is not the same as the body, yet it<br />

is also not separate from the body: “the soul does not exist without a<br />

body <strong>and</strong> yet is not itself a kind of body.” Aristotle uses a variety of<br />

expressions to capture this relation: “the soul is the actuality of the<br />

body” <strong>and</strong> “the soul exists in a body” <strong>and</strong> “the product of the two is<br />

an ensouled thing.” Aristotle’s expressions are attempts to describe<br />

the unity of matter <strong>and</strong> form in a being whose body seems lifeless<br />

without an immaterial cause that gives it motion <strong>and</strong> function. In<br />

this view, the soul actualizes the potential of the body to do its proper<br />

work.<br />

What surprises the reader of Aristotle is the claim that all living<br />

beings have “souls”—there are plant souls, animal souls, <strong>and</strong> human<br />

souls. While shocking at first, Aristotle’s idea follows common sense<br />

in distinguishing living beings by three different capacities: (1) selfmotion,<br />

(2) sense perception, <strong>and</strong> (3) thinking. All living things are<br />

distinguished from non-living things by the power of self-motion—<br />

either by growing (including feeding <strong>and</strong> reproducing) or by moving<br />

from place to place (local motion). Plants are self-moving in the sense<br />

of feeding, growing, <strong>and</strong> reproducing; hence, they have “plant souls.”<br />

Animals have self-motion <strong>and</strong> sense perception, <strong>and</strong> even some capacity<br />

for desiring <strong>and</strong> wishing that seems to involve “imagination,” if not<br />

intellectual activity. Hence, they have “animal souls.” <strong>Human</strong> beings<br />

have “human souls” because their souls include all three powers—self-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!