10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Justice <strong>and</strong> Access to Health Care<br />

<strong>Dignity</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Bioethics</strong> | 485<br />

Access to health care <strong>and</strong> the just distribution of health care resources<br />

are pressing questions both within individual nations <strong>and</strong> between<br />

the nations that constitute our globalized world community. <strong>Human</strong><br />

dignity is often invoked in such discussions, but without much clarity<br />

or rigor.<br />

Intrinsic dignity, as elaborated in this essay, can be understood<br />

as the foundation of all human rights. We respect the rights of an<br />

individual because we first recognize his or her intrinsic dignity. We<br />

do not bestow dignity because we first bestow rights. <strong>Human</strong> beings<br />

have rights that must be respected because of the value they have by<br />

virtue of being the kinds of things that they are.<br />

Intrinsic dignity is at the core of all our beliefs about moral obligation.<br />

Of particular relevance to discussions of access to health care<br />

resources are principles P-I <strong>and</strong> P-IV.<br />

Absolute rights (also called negative rights or natural rights) are<br />

based on P-I, the duty to respect all members of natural kinds that<br />

bear dignity. These include, for example, the rights not to be killed,<br />

not to be treated disrespectfully, <strong>and</strong> not to be experimented upon<br />

without one’s consent. These rights can <strong>and</strong> should be respected by<br />

all persons <strong>and</strong> all societies regardless of their ecological, historical,<br />

physical, social, or economic circumstances. In Kantian terminology,<br />

these rights entail duties of perfect obligation.<br />

I have argued that health care is not an absolute right or a natural<br />

right in this sense of the word. 31 To assert a right to health care is to<br />

assert a positive right—a right to goods <strong>and</strong> services that must, of<br />

necessity, vary according to the ecological, historical, physical, social,<br />

<strong>and</strong> economic circumstances of individual persons <strong>and</strong> societies. In<br />

Kantian terminology, these rights entail duties of imperfect obligation.<br />

They apply to the degree that they can be instituted in various<br />

circumstances. Such so-called positive rights are based on P-IV, the<br />

duty to build up the inflorescent dignity of individuals belonging to<br />

a natural kind that has, as a kind, intrinsic dignity.<br />

Health is critical for the flourishing of any member of any living<br />

natural kind. This is no less true for members of the human natural<br />

kind. Diseases diminish health. Accordingly, the concept of disease<br />

necessarily includes reference to the adverse effects of the condition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!