10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Religious Character of <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong> | 403<br />

good is it to stay alive if you are comatose, suffering; blind? Could<br />

Milton possibly have been right when he told us, in On his blindness,<br />

that “they also serve who only st<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wait?” Could Shakespeare<br />

have been right when, in one of the most extraordinary passages in<br />

Lear, Gloucester’s loving son says to him (after Gloucester has been<br />

cruelly abused, tormented <strong>and</strong> blinded), “Thy life’s a miracle!”?<br />

To remain alive <strong>and</strong> serve God <strong>and</strong> man the best you can when<br />

you really want life to be over is profoundly inspiring—to man <strong>and</strong><br />

(probably) to God. But what about a Terry Schiavo, evidently unable<br />

to do anything? She was indeed able to do something—maybe<br />

only one thing, but maybe the most important. She was able to inspire<br />

love. And when the topic is love, we need all the education we<br />

can get. “The Torah for its own sake is a law of love” (Sukkah 49b).<br />

(When the Talmud insists that one must grapple with Torah for its<br />

own sake, it foreshadows Kant’s insistence that duty done for its own<br />

sake equals human freedom. In Judaism you achieve sanctity—in<br />

Kant freedom—by doing your duty simply to do it.)<br />

Consider two of the horrors of human cloning <strong>and</strong> “designer<br />

babies.” Any technology gets better; children of parents who order<br />

up the smartest possible babies in year n will easily be outclassed by<br />

younger children whose parents do the same ten years later (while<br />

probably paying a lot less for much spiffier models). Designer children<br />

will grow obsolete, just like PCs. (Bill McKibben discusses this<br />

possibility in Enough. 6 )<br />

Here’s an even more horrifying possibility. I’ve heard <strong>and</strong> read<br />

several times (on cable TV <strong>and</strong> in ordinary newspapers) this justification<br />

for human cloning: consider parents whose child has contracted<br />

a fatal disease or been killed in an accident. Those parents could use<br />

tissue from the doomed or dead child to clone an exact duplicate—<br />

which would make the loss of the original less hard to bear.<br />

But imagine the thoughts of the doomed original. “I’m sick<br />

<strong>and</strong> dying, but my parents have no need to grieve too much. Do<br />

they even need to grieve at all? Before long I’ll be replaced by an<br />

exact duplicate, <strong>and</strong> life will carry on exactly as before, for everyone<br />

except me.”<br />

“Someone else will wear my clothes, sit at my place, speak my<br />

lines <strong>and</strong> impersonate me; he will make people believe I am still alive.<br />

Everyone will enjoy the performance—but I won’t.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!