10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong>: the Council’s Vision | 257<br />

discussion—who are the great <strong>and</strong> who the ordinary human beings—<br />

may be far less obvious.<br />

As it becomes less obvious, as the “comparative” sense of dignity<br />

begins to be transformed by the “non-comparative,” as we are less<br />

sure what is the “floor” <strong>and</strong> what the “height” of human worth, we<br />

may incline to draw back a bit from some elements in the Council’s<br />

discussion. For example, imagining a woman who was once a “virtuoso<br />

violinist” <strong>and</strong> is now suffering from dementia, her “treasured<br />

capacities” largely gone, the Council first affirms that she “remains<br />

a full member of the human community, equally worthy of human<br />

care.” But it then expresses puzzlement about what her dignity might<br />

mean when those capacities are “fading or gone.” In the case of such<br />

a virtuoso—the suggestion seems to be—dementia is especially degrading.<br />

“For all people—<strong>and</strong> perhaps most vividly for those who<br />

once stood high above the ordinary—the regression to dementia <strong>and</strong><br />

incompetence, with all its accompanying indignities <strong>and</strong> loss of selfcomm<strong>and</strong>,<br />

may seem dehumanizing <strong>and</strong> humiliating” (107).<br />

This does not seem true to me. Moreover, I think there is something<br />

objectionable about this way of putting the matter. I cannot<br />

see why dementia afflicting this “virtuoso violinist” should be any<br />

more vividly dehumanizing than it would be were it to afflict, say,<br />

the woman who regularly empties the trash can in my office. Still<br />

more, I would be reluctant to call dementia in either case dehumanizing.<br />

I know of course that one might sometimes incline to the view<br />

that dementia in the case of the violinist was somehow worse than<br />

dementia in the case of the janitor, <strong>and</strong> there might be occasions<br />

when I could be inclined to suppose that dementia in either case was<br />

dehumanizing, but I would regard such inclinations as temptations<br />

(to be resisted as best I could).<br />

It is when I ask myself why these inclinations should be regarded<br />

as temptations that the puzzles arise. I am reluctant to say that any<br />

living human being, even one severely disabled by dementia, has lost<br />

human dignity. Why? I am reluctant to say that some human beings—those<br />

with certain highly developed capacities—have greater<br />

dignity than others. Why?<br />

These two puzzles are interrelated. If we assert that every human<br />

being has dignity, someone is certain to ask from us an account of<br />

what it is about human beings that gives them this equal dignity. And

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!