10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 | Peter Augustine Lawler<br />

The Christian Underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>Human</strong> Freedom<br />

Our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the dignity of the individual or the person<br />

originates, I think, with Christianity, particularly with St. Augustine.<br />

We find it in Augustine’s criticism of the civil <strong>and</strong> natural theologies—the<br />

respectable theologies—of the Greeks <strong>and</strong> the Romans<br />

for misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing who the human being is. Civil theology—the<br />

gods of the city or political community—is based on the premise<br />

that human beings are essentially citizens or part of a city. But that’s<br />

not true. <strong>Human</strong> longings point beyond one’s own country <strong>and</strong> can’t<br />

be satisfied by any kind of political dedication or success. It’s finally<br />

undignified or untruthful for a Roman to identify himself or his fate<br />

with Rome. Augustine didn’t deny there was a certain nobility or<br />

dignity of citizens who subordinated their selfish interests for their<br />

country’s common good. But even or especially the best Romans<br />

were looking in the wrong place for genuine personal security <strong>and</strong><br />

significance or immortality. They were looking in the wrong place for<br />

personal meaning or transcendence or perfection. 2<br />

The polytheism of civil theology was also undignified insofar as<br />

it was an offense against the human mind. It required that educated<br />

men degrade themselves by feigning belief in unbelievable gods<br />

<strong>and</strong> engage in a futile effort to fend off moral deterioration as their<br />

country became more sophisticated. Such efforts were also degrading<br />

to others; they opposed the particular human being’s efforts to free<br />

himself from what are finally selfish communal illusions. Civil theology,<br />

by defining us as citizens <strong>and</strong> nothing more, hides from us the<br />

dignity that all human beings share in common.<br />

Sophisticated Greeks <strong>and</strong> Romans, Augustine adds, rejected the<br />

gods of their country for nature’s God, the God of the philosophers.<br />

But that growth in theological sophistication in the direction of impersonal<br />

monotheism was only ambiguously progress. All reasonable<br />

theology is monotheistic; the orderly universe <strong>and</strong> essentially equal<br />

human beings must be governed by a single God. But Augustine still<br />

saw two problems with nature’s God. First, he is too distant or too<br />

impersonal to provide any real support for the moral duties of particular<br />

human beings; dignified personal action or personal existence<br />

can’t be based on a God that is finally not a “who” but a “what.”<br />

Second, natural theology is based on the premise that the human

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!