10.05.2015 Views

Aquatic Strategy and Feasibility Study - Far North District Council

Aquatic Strategy and Feasibility Study - Far North District Council

Aquatic Strategy and Feasibility Study - Far North District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MEETING: COUNCIL – 25 July 2013<br />

Name of item: DRAFT AQUATIC STRATEGY & FEASIBILITY STUDY<br />

Author:<br />

Sue Hodge, Community Policy Manager<br />

Date of report: 8 July 2013<br />

Document number: A1372543<br />

Item: 5.1<br />

Executive Summary<br />

The purpose of the report is to receive the Draft <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>and</strong> a presentation<br />

from the author Freeman Associates <strong>and</strong> to set down a time to workshop the<br />

recommendations in more detail. It is also suggested that the draft strategy is made<br />

available to the three Community Boards, the two swimming pool interest groups, the<br />

current pool operators <strong>and</strong> the affected schools for their comments prior to a <strong>Council</strong><br />

workshop.<br />

Recommendation:<br />

THAT the Draft <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Feasibility</strong> Studies for Kaitaia, Kaikohe <strong>and</strong><br />

Kerikeri report be sent to the three Community Boards, Te Hiku Community<br />

<strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Recreational Centre group, the Kerikeri <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fitness Centre<br />

group, CBEC, The Hub Trust <strong>and</strong> the affected schools being <strong>North</strong>l<strong>and</strong> College,<br />

Bay of Isl<strong>and</strong>s College, Te Rangi Aniwaniwa, Kaitaia College <strong>and</strong> Kerikeri High<br />

School for their comments prior to the <strong>Council</strong> holding a workshop to discuss the<br />

draft strategy <strong>and</strong> financial implications in more detail.<br />

1) Background:<br />

Sport New Zeal<strong>and</strong> has funded an independent evidence based aquatic strategy for the<br />

future development <strong>and</strong> provision of swimming pools in the <strong>Far</strong> <strong>North</strong>. This study looks<br />

at the provision of a <strong>North</strong>l<strong>and</strong> hierarchy of indoor <strong>and</strong> outdoor facilities to meet the<br />

needs of the <strong>Far</strong> <strong>North</strong> residents for recreational <strong>and</strong> competition swimming for the next<br />

15-20 years.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has funded a feasibility study of proposed indoor heated swimming pools at<br />

Kaitaia, Kerikeri <strong>and</strong> Kaikohe. The draft feasibility study includes the operational <strong>and</strong><br />

capital costs of these pools <strong>and</strong> the impact on existing swimming pools such as<br />

Kawakawa. The feasibility study aligns with the draft <strong>Far</strong> <strong>North</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> strategy.<br />

The attached document “Draft <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> & <strong>Feasibility</strong> studies for Kaitaia, Kerikeri<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kaikohe” has been prepared by Freemen Associates <strong>and</strong> peer reviewed by Sport<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong>.<br />

2) Discussion <strong>and</strong> options<br />

There are two interest groups in Kaitaia <strong>and</strong> Kerikeri [Te Hiku Community <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Recreational Centre group <strong>and</strong> the Kerikeri <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fitness Centre group] that are<br />

Document number A1372543 Page 1 of 5


championing indoor heated swimming pools in their respective towns. These groups<br />

have made submissions to <strong>Council</strong> through the Long Term Plan <strong>and</strong> Annual Plan<br />

process. They have met regularly with the author of the draft strategy <strong>and</strong> have been<br />

engaged in the strategy development. The draft strategy has been released to these<br />

groups simultaneously with <strong>Council</strong>ors. They have not had time to review the document<br />

<strong>and</strong> provide feedback although they have been invited to attend the July <strong>Council</strong><br />

meeting.<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s pool operator, CBEC, have provided much of the information that has been<br />

used to develop the recommendations in the draft strategy. An independent pool<br />

management company has audited the condition of the existing pools. CBEC have been<br />

given a copy of the draft strategy <strong>and</strong> condition assessment <strong>and</strong> have not had time to<br />

read <strong>and</strong> comment on the content of the report, the validity or the recommendations.<br />

The recommendations in the strategy will affect a number of schools such as Bay of<br />

Isl<strong>and</strong>s College, Kerikeri High School, <strong>North</strong>l<strong>and</strong> College, Te Rangi Aniwaniwa <strong>and</strong><br />

Kaitaia College. It is recommended these schools are also provided with an opportunity<br />

to comment on the report <strong>and</strong> recommendations.<br />

Community Boards have a role in recommending to <strong>Council</strong> community facilities that<br />

might be required by their communities or an increase in the community rate. It is<br />

recommended this draft strategy is presented to the Boards for their comments prior to<br />

further <strong>Council</strong> consideration.<br />

The draft strategy has been developed after consideration of a number of other relevant<br />

documents <strong>and</strong> information such as:<br />

1. The new purpose statement that requires local government to “meet the<br />

current <strong>and</strong> future needs of communities for good-quality local infrastructure<br />

in a way that is most cost-effective for households <strong>and</strong> businesses.”<br />

2. Current School Pool provision <strong>and</strong> the portable pool program<br />

3. <strong>Far</strong> <strong>North</strong> Swimming Club needs <strong>and</strong> wants<br />

4. Regional <strong>Aquatic</strong> Facilities<br />

5. 2013 National Facilities strategy for aquatic sports<br />

6. Street surveys<br />

7. CLM’s independent pool condition assessment report<br />

3) Recommendations:<br />

The report has a number of recommendations.<br />

1. Firstly, the FNDC establish a hierarchy of swimming pool provision, <strong>and</strong><br />

rationalise existing swimming pool facilities, to provider fewer, higher quality facilities,<br />

this being the most cost- effective option for households <strong>and</strong> businesses in the <strong>Far</strong> <strong>North</strong><br />

area.<br />

The hierarchy will consist of:<br />

Regional Provision<br />

Document number A1372543 Page 2 of 5


The strategy proposes that the regional facilities for <strong>North</strong>l<strong>and</strong> competitive swimming can<br />

best be met by:<br />

(a) Long-course events - 50 metre outdoor pool in Dargaville.<br />

(b) Short-course events: Whangarei is best placed to develop a new 25 metre x<br />

8 lane pool with seating for 1,000 people.<br />

<strong>District</strong> Provision<br />

Kerikeri<br />

To meet the wider district needs for a higher quality facility an indoor heated 25 metre x<br />

8 lane swimming pool complex, with learners / hydrotherapy pool, lazy river <strong>and</strong> dive<br />

pool be developed in Kerikeri<br />

Estimated cost of $12-15M<br />

Local Provision<br />

To meet local swimming pool needs the most cost effective options for households <strong>and</strong><br />

businesses are recommended below:<br />

Kaitaia<br />

Indoor heated learners/hydrotherapy pool <strong>and</strong> lazy river, <strong>and</strong> an outdoor 25 metre x 6<br />

lane swimming pool complex, with dive pool <strong>and</strong> toddlers play area that complements<br />

<strong>and</strong> does not compete with the lane pool at Te Puna Wai, to meet the long-term needs<br />

of the Kaitaia community<br />

Estimated cost of $6-8M<br />

Kaikohe<br />

Outdoor 25 metre x 6 lane pool, with dive pool at <strong>North</strong>l<strong>and</strong> College to meet the needs of<br />

the Kaikohe community.<br />

Estimated cost of $3-4M<br />

Community pools<br />

<strong>Council</strong> continues to support public access to school pools such as Whangaroa College<br />

as this is aligned with FNDC's vision to provide an appropriate quantity <strong>and</strong> quality of<br />

aquatic facilities to meet needs of residents.<br />

2. Secondly, the report recommends rationalising the current facilities to provide<br />

fewer but higher quality facilities<br />

Kawakawa<br />

To rationalise older, poor quality swimming pool facilities in the <strong>Far</strong> <strong>North</strong> the Kawakawa<br />

Pool is closed to coincide with development of the Kerikeri swimming pool complex,<br />

because investing in maintaining this pool is not the most cost-effective long- term option<br />

for households <strong>and</strong> businesses in this community.<br />

Document number A1372543 Page 3 of 5


Kaitaia<br />

To rationalise older, poor quality swimming pool facilities the Kaitaia memorial pool is<br />

closed to coincide with development of the Kaitaia indoor - outdoor pool because<br />

investing in maintaining this pool is not the most cost-effective long-term option for<br />

households <strong>and</strong> businesses in this community.<br />

4) Financial implications <strong>and</strong> budgetary provision<br />

This independent draft strategy <strong>and</strong> feasibility study proposes a hierarchy of pools to be<br />

developed over the next 15 years to meet the needs of the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Any new swimming pool proposal will require significant investment. As a guide the<br />

feasibility study has determined what a potential swimming pool targeted ward rate might<br />

need to be to fund the full cost of each swimming pool proposal. However, the <strong>Council</strong><br />

has been clear to date that each community would be expected to fundraise for their<br />

local share of any proposed facility. The Te Hiku Community <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Recreational<br />

Centre group <strong>and</strong> the Kerikeri <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fitness Centre group have stated they are<br />

prepared to fundraise for swimming pool facilities in their community.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> is also aware that the capacity of each community to fundraise for their local<br />

share may vary as they rely heavily on community grant organisations such as ASB<br />

Trust, Lion Foundation or New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Lottery Board. Unfortunately, under their current<br />

funding criteria there are limited opportunities for any significant funding for swimming<br />

pools.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> has other capital projects that it has prioritised such as Bay of Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Wastewater project. The <strong>Council</strong> needs to consider the timing of these projects along<br />

side any recommendations to build discretionary projects such as new swimming pools.<br />

Therefore to enable <strong>Council</strong> to consider the full financial implications of this draft strategy<br />

it is recommended a workshop is held so that more time is available for discussion <strong>and</strong><br />

debate. This discussion could consider the validity of the suggested hierarchy, the<br />

potential timing of projects, the possibility of considering a swimming pool targeted ward<br />

rate <strong>and</strong> what might be considered to be a fair “local’ share that needs to be fundraised<br />

among other issues.<br />

Any conclusions the <strong>Council</strong> might reach, or any options the <strong>Council</strong> would like the<br />

community to consider, would need to be included in the 2015 Long Term Plan for public<br />

input.<br />

5) Reason for the Recommendation<br />

It is recommended those organisations or groups that might be affected by this draft<br />

strategy be provided an opportunity to read <strong>and</strong> comment on the draft strategy prior to<br />

<strong>Council</strong> considering it further. It is further recommended that once this information has<br />

been received the <strong>Council</strong> holds a workshop so that sufficient time is available to discuss<br />

the recommendations in the draft strategy <strong>and</strong> the financial implications.<br />

Corporate Services Manager; Bernard Murphy - General Manager<br />

Attachment 1: <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> & <strong>Feasibility</strong> studies for Kaitaia, Kerikeri <strong>and</strong> Kaikohe<br />

Document No; A1372741<br />

Document number A1372543 Page 4 of 5


Compliance schedule:<br />

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 in<br />

relation to decision making <strong>and</strong> in particular the need to promote the social, economic,<br />

environmental <strong>and</strong> cultural well being of the Community, <strong>and</strong> the views <strong>and</strong> preferences<br />

of persons likely to be affected by, or have an interest in, the matter, as set out below:<br />

Relationship with existing policies <strong>and</strong><br />

Community outcomes<br />

Possible implications for the relationship of<br />

Maori <strong>and</strong> their culture <strong>and</strong> traditions with<br />

their ancestral l<strong>and</strong>, water, site, waahi<br />

tapu, valued flora <strong>and</strong> fauna, <strong>and</strong> other<br />

taonga<br />

Views or preferences of persons likely to<br />

be affected by, or to have an interest in the<br />

matter, including persons with disabilities.<br />

Does the issue, proposal, decision or other<br />

matter have a high degree of significance as<br />

determined under the <strong>Council</strong>'s policy 2116?<br />

There is no particular implication for Maori<br />

The views of the Te Hiku Community<br />

<strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Recreational Centre group<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Kerikeri <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fitness<br />

Centre groups are yet to be provided<br />

Yes the recommendations in the draft<br />

report are significant <strong>and</strong> the final<br />

recommendations would need to be<br />

included in the 2015/2025 Long Term<br />

Plan.<br />

If the matter has a Community rather than<br />

a <strong>District</strong> wide relevance has the<br />

Community Board's views been sought?<br />

Document number A1372543 Page 5 of 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!