10.05.2015 Views

Aquatic Plant Surveys for Orchard Lake, Lakeville ... - City of Lakeville

Aquatic Plant Surveys for Orchard Lake, Lakeville ... - City of Lakeville

Aquatic Plant Surveys for Orchard Lake, Lakeville ... - City of Lakeville

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chet Reneson: Tight Line, undated<br />

<strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>,<br />

<strong>Lake</strong>ville, Minnesota, 2008<br />

Summer <strong>Surveys</strong>: May 30 and September 1, 2008<br />

Prepared <strong>for</strong>:<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>ville<br />

<strong>Lake</strong>ville, Minnesota<br />

Prepared by:<br />

Steve McComas and Jo Stuckert<br />

Blue Water Science<br />

St. Paul, Minnesota<br />

Submitted January 2009


<strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>,<br />

<strong>Lake</strong>ville, Minnesota, 2008<br />

Summary<br />

Two aquatic plant surveys were conducted on <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> (234 acres) in 2008 The early<br />

summer survey on May 30, 2008 occurred be<strong>for</strong>e the aquatic weed harvester finished<br />

harvesting curlyleaf pondweed on <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>. The May 30 survey evaluated the distribution<br />

and abundance <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf pondweed. The late summer survey <strong>of</strong> September 1 characterized<br />

any changes in the plant community and there were checks <strong>for</strong> Eurasian watermilfoil.<br />

Early Summer Survey: In early summer, the most abundant plant in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> was<br />

curlyleaf pondweed and it was found at 96% <strong>of</strong> the 26 stations (Table 1). In the past, curlyleaf<br />

pondweed has been growing to the surface producing recreational nuisance conditions in water<br />

depths out to 10 feet. Harvesting in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 has drastically reduced<br />

nuisance curlyleaf growth (defined as curlyleaf growing to the surface). Overall aquatic plants<br />

grew to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10 feet in 2008. No Eurasian watermilfoil was found in this survey.<br />

Late Summer Survey: The dominant plant in September <strong>of</strong> 2008 in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> was coontail<br />

(Table 1). No Eurasian watermilfoil was found in this late summer survey. Overall, aquatic<br />

plants grew out to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10 feet around much <strong>of</strong> the lake except in the southeast end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lake. <strong>Aquatic</strong> plants covered about 120 acres, representing 51% <strong>of</strong> the 234 acre lake. Coontail<br />

was the dominant plant in the September survey occurring at 82% <strong>of</strong> the stations. Significant<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> benthic filamentous algae rose to the surface and washed up on the south side <strong>of</strong><br />

the lake in July and August <strong>of</strong> 2008.<br />

No Harvesting Post Harvesting Post Harvesting<br />

Conditions Conditions<br />

Pre Harvesting Pre Harvesting Pre Harvesting<br />

Conditions Conditions Conditions<br />

Figure 1. The coverage <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants in early summer from 2003 to 2008 is shown in pink and nuisance<br />

curlyleaf pondweed is shown in red. An estimated 70 acres <strong>of</strong> nuisance curlyleaf growth was found in 2003.<br />

Mechanical weed harvesting was conducted on <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in May <strong>of</strong> 2004 through 2008. An estimated 41<br />

acres <strong>of</strong> nuisance curlyleaf growth was found prior to mechanical harvesting. The area <strong>of</strong> nuisance<br />

coverage after harvesting was completed was less in 2004 through 2008 compared to 2003 conditions.<br />

-i-


Table 1. The percent occurrence <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in 2008. Percent<br />

occurrence is calculated based on the number <strong>of</strong> times a plant species occurs at a<br />

sampling station on transects divided into the number <strong>of</strong> total stations <strong>for</strong> the survey.<br />

For example, if milfoil was found in 25 out <strong>of</strong> 50 stations, its percent occurrence would<br />

be 50%.<br />

Duckweed<br />

(Lemna sp)<br />

Spatterdock<br />

(Nuphar variegatum)<br />

W hite waterlily<br />

(Nymphaea sp)<br />

Marigold<br />

(Bidens Beckii)<br />

Coontail<br />

(Ceratophyllum demersum)<br />

Chara<br />

(Chara sp.)<br />

Star duckweed<br />

(Lemna trisulca)<br />

Northern watermilfoil<br />

(Myriophyllum sibiricum)<br />

Naiads<br />

(Najas flexilis)<br />

Cabbage<br />

(Potamogeton amplifolius)<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed<br />

(P. crispus)<br />

Claspingleaf pondweed<br />

(P. richardsonii)<br />

Narrowleaf pondweed<br />

(P. sp)<br />

Buttercup<br />

(Ranunculus sp)<br />

Water celery<br />

(Vallisneria americana)<br />

Water stargrass<br />

(Zosterella dubia)<br />

May 30, 2008<br />

(% occur)<br />

September 1, 2008<br />

(% occur)<br />

Changes from<br />

May to September<br />

0 4 +<br />

0 14 +<br />

12 11 0<br />

4 4 0<br />

35 82 +<br />

12 25 +<br />

4 4 0<br />

8 36 +<br />

0 4 +<br />

4 7 +<br />

96 11 -<br />

4 4 0<br />

8 0 -<br />

0 0 0<br />

0 4 +<br />

0 11 +<br />

Filamentous algae 35 68 +<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Submerged Species 9 11 +<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>ville has sponsored annual aquatic plant surveys since 1999. A summary <strong>of</strong><br />

the percent occurrence <strong>of</strong> individual species on a lakewide basis is shown in Table 2. Since<br />

1995, it appears that eight submerged species have increased and three submerged species<br />

have decreased. Six species are found sparingly or have not changed in abundance. The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> species found in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> has remained about the same since 1995 (Table 2).<br />

-ii-


Table 2. The percent occurrence <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>for</strong> 1995 and 1999 through 2008. Mechanical harvesting has occurred from 2004 to 2008<br />

(blue shading). Changes in plant abundance are rated as: + = increase, -- = decrease, 0 = no significant change (1995 data are from Barr Engineering Company,<br />

Diagnostic Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>, 1999).<br />

Duckweed<br />

(Lemna sp)<br />

Spatterdock<br />

(Nuphar variegatum)<br />

White waterlily<br />

(Nymphaea sp)<br />

Marsh marigold<br />

(Bidens beckii)<br />

Coontail<br />

(Ceratophyllum<br />

demersum)<br />

Chara<br />

(Chara sp.)<br />

Star duckweed<br />

(Lemna trisulca)<br />

Northern watermilfoil<br />

(Myriophyllum<br />

sibiricum)<br />

Naiads<br />

(Najas sp)<br />

Nitella<br />

(Nitella sp)<br />

Cabbage<br />

(Potamogeton<br />

amplifolius)<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed<br />

(P. crispus)<br />

Illinois pondweed<br />

(P. illinoensis)<br />

Stringy pondweed<br />

(P. pusillus)<br />

Claspingleaf<br />

pondweed<br />

(P. richardsonii)<br />

Narrowleaf<br />

pondweed<br />

(P. sp)<br />

Flatstem pondweed<br />

(P. zosteri<strong>for</strong>mis)<br />

Buttercup<br />

(Ranunculus sp)<br />

Sago pondweed<br />

(Stuckenia<br />

pectinatus)<br />

Water celery<br />

(Vallisneria<br />

americana)<br />

Water stargrass<br />

(Zosterella dubia)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

submerged species<br />

June 16,<br />

1995<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

57<br />

stations)<br />

June 5,<br />

1999<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

May 26,<br />

2000<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

June 8,<br />

2001<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

May 31,<br />

2002<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

42<br />

stations)<br />

May 17,<br />

2003<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

June 7,<br />

2004<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

24<br />

stations)<br />

May 21,<br />

2005<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

26<br />

stations)<br />

May 26,<br />

2006<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

30<br />

stations)<br />

May 22,<br />

2007<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

26<br />

stations)<br />

May 30,<br />

2008<br />

% Occur<br />

(based<br />

pm 26<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 20,<br />

1995<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

57<br />

stations)<br />

-- – -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 -- -- 4 0<br />

-- 5 10 5 5 8 13 15 10 12 -- -- 10 8 8 10 8 12 13 10 12 14 0<br />

-- 5 3 3 7 5 4 -- 7 12 12 -- 8 13 12 10 13 27 17 17 19 11 +<br />

-- -- -- -- 5 -- -- -- -- -- 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 0<br />

12 18 28 74 38 38 88 62 13 27 35 74 85 56 88 90 90 100 90 93 88 82 +<br />

12 13 13 28 12 10 4 15 10 8 12 18 26 8 27 10 5 19 13 17 19 25 +<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7 8 4 -- -- 3 -- 5 5 8 17 17 15 4 +<br />

18 23 3 41 12 3 25 19 33 12 8 21 5 23 46 33 13 54 33 27 27 36 +<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13 -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 -- -- 4 0<br />

-- -- -- -- 2 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0<br />

5 8 3 13 14 10 13 19 33 31 4 8 3 13 23 10 8 27 27 27 19 7 -<br />

98 74 95 92 74 100 92 96 100 100 96 55 -- 23 4 5 26 -- 7 -- 4 11 -<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0<br />

-- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0<br />

9 5 -- 10 5 -- -- -- 7 4 4 18 3 5 8 3 8 8 -- 7 4 4 0<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --<br />

2 -- -- 5 -- -- 4 -- 7 -- -- 13 5 -- 4 8 -- 4 3 -- -- -- 0<br />

-- 8 3 -- -- 3 4 12 3 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- -- -<br />

4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 -- 8 4 -- -- 8 3 3 -- -- 0<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 13 12 13 3 12 4 +<br />

4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 27 13 3 8 11 +<br />

9 7 6 8 8 7 7 6 9 8 9 9 6 10 8 9 10 11 11 9 9 11<br />

Aug 14,<br />

1999<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Oct 6,<br />

2000<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Sept 17,<br />

2001<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Sept 8,<br />

2002<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 20,<br />

2003<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 29,<br />

2004<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

26<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 22,<br />

2005<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

30<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 21,<br />

2006<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

30<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 26,<br />

2007<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

26<br />

stations)<br />

Sept 1,<br />

2008<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

28<br />

stations)<br />

Change<br />

from 1995<br />

to 2007<br />

(spring<br />

and fall)<br />

-iii-


Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> Water Quality: Summer averages <strong>for</strong> clarity (using a Secchi<br />

disc), phosphorus, and algae (using chlorophyll analysis) were some <strong>of</strong> the best on record in<br />

2008 (Table 3). <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> is not in the impaired status category. Impaired criteria are<br />

shown in Table 4.<br />

Table 3. Water quality summary <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>. Data are May-September averages from the<br />

Met Council CAMP program. Blue shading represents years <strong>of</strong> significant curlyleaf pondweed<br />

harvesting.<br />

Secchi Disc<br />

(m)<br />

Total Phosphorus<br />

(ppb)<br />

Chlorophyll a<br />

(ppb)<br />

1980 2 40 16<br />

1981 3 26 11<br />

1983 2.9 31 11<br />

1987 1.8 -- --<br />

1988 2.3 -- --<br />

1989 2.1 28 14<br />

1990 1 -- --<br />

1991 1.9 -- --<br />

1993 2 35 17<br />

1995 1.3 44 31<br />

1996 2.3 28 15<br />

1998 1.9 38 24<br />

1999 2.1 34 30<br />

2000 2 39 20<br />

2001 2.3 25 13<br />

2004 2.6 38 17<br />

2005 2.4 32 12<br />

2006 2.2 34 14<br />

2007 1.6 41 23<br />

2008 3.0 24 11<br />

Table 4. MPCA nutrient criteria <strong>for</strong> impaired lakes (MPCA 2005). <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> is a deep lake.<br />

Water quality results indicate <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> is not in the impaired category.<br />

Secchi Disc<br />

(m)<br />

Total Phosphorus<br />

(ppb)<br />

Chlorophyll a<br />

(ppb)<br />

Shallow <strong>Lake</strong> >1.0


<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> Dakota County (ID: 19-31)<br />

Size: 234 acres; Littoral area: 177 acres (MnDNR)<br />

Maximum depth: 33 feet (MnDNR map)<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> is a 234 acre moderately fertile lake in <strong>Lake</strong>ville, Minnesota. In 2008, the<br />

average summer water clarity was 3.0 meters (9.8 feet) and the total phosphorus<br />

concentration was 24 parts per billion (source: CAMP, Met Council).<br />

The plants <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> were sampled to evaluate curlyleaf pondweed and to look <strong>for</strong><br />

Eurasian watermilfoil. Eurasian watermilfoil has not been found in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> (as <strong>of</strong><br />

September 1, 2008). Steve McComas, Blue Water Science, conducted two aquatic plant<br />

surveys on May 30 and September 1, 2008.<br />

Methods<br />

Thirteen transects were made at different locations around <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>. A transect<br />

started at the weedline and headed into shore (Figure 1). Two depths (0-5 feet and 6-10<br />

feet) along the transect were sampled with a rake to assess the aquatic plant composition.<br />

The amount <strong>of</strong> plants on the rake determined the density <strong>of</strong> each species at that location.<br />

Low density rated a ‘1' and a high density was a ‘5'.<br />

Figure 1. Transects <strong>for</strong> plant surveys on May 30 and September 1, 2008. Transects 8.5 and 11.5<br />

were not included in statistics in 2008 to stay consistent with previous surveys.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 1


Results: May 8 -- Curlyleaf Assessment<br />

In 2007, curlyleaf pondweed grew to nuisance levels quicker than expected and by the<br />

time the mechanical harvesters arrived and curlyleaf growth was well advanced. In 2008,<br />

an early curlyleaf assessment was conducted on May 8, 2008 to evaluate curlyleaf growth<br />

status. In early May, curlyleaf growth was present, but stem length was short, at less than<br />

a foot. Harvesting was scheduled <strong>for</strong> the second half <strong>of</strong> May.<br />

It appears the rapid curlyleaf growth in 2007 was not the typical pattern, and curlyleaf<br />

harvesting can generally start about the third week in May.<br />

Figure 2. On May 8, 2008 curlyleaf pondweed was present, but stem lengths were generally less than<br />

12-inches tall. In the southeast side <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>, thick bottom mats <strong>of</strong> filamentous algae were<br />

present.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 2


Results: May 30 -- Early Summer Survey<br />

In early summer, the most abundant plant in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> was curlyleaf pondweed and it<br />

was found at 96% <strong>of</strong> the 26 stations. In the past, curlyleaf pondweed has been growing to<br />

the surface producing recreational nuisance conditions in water depths out to 10 feet.<br />

Harvesting in 2004 through 2008 has drastically reduced nuisance curlyleaf growth<br />

(defined as curlyleaf growing to the surface). Overall aquatic plants grew to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

feet in 2008. No Eurasian watermilfoil was found in this survey. A summary <strong>of</strong> the<br />

occurrence and density <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants is shown in Table 1.<br />

An aquatic plant coverage map is shown in Figure 3. Curlyleaf pondweed coverage is<br />

basically the same as the aquatic plant coverage map with coverage approximately at 180<br />

acres. This is nearly the same coverage <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf that was surveyed in 2003 (prior to<br />

the start <strong>of</strong> the harvesting program). However, the area <strong>of</strong> nuisance curlyleaf pondweed<br />

growth is less in 2008 compared to 2003. Nuisance coverage <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf pondweed in<br />

2008 is shown in Figure 3 and was sampled prior to harvesting. After harvesting was<br />

completed in early June, there was very little curlyleaf pondweed growth that would be<br />

considered a nuisance.<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> plant density and occurrence <strong>for</strong> individual transects is shown in Table 2.<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed conditions are shown in Figure 4.<br />

Figure 3. <strong>Aquatic</strong> plant coverage and curlyleaf coverage on May 30, 2008. Pink shading represents<br />

non-nuisance curlyleaf growth along with other plants. Red shading indicates nuisance curlyleaf<br />

growth prior to harvesting.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 3


Table 1. <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> aquatic plant occurrences and densities <strong>for</strong> the May 30, 2008<br />

survey based on 15 transects and 2 depths, <strong>for</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 30 stations. Density ratings are<br />

1-5 with 1 being low and 5 being most dense. Transect 8.5 and 11.5 were not used in<br />

statistics.<br />

W hite waterlily<br />

(Nymphaea tuberosa)<br />

Marigold<br />

(Bidens Beckii)<br />

Coontail<br />

(Ceratophyllum demersum)<br />

Chara<br />

(Chara sp)<br />

Star duckweed<br />

(Lemna trisulca)<br />

Northern watermilfoil<br />

(Myriophyllum sibiricum)<br />

Cabbage<br />

(Potamogeton amplifolius)<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed<br />

(P. crispus)<br />

Claspingleaf pondweed<br />

(P. Richardsonii)<br />

Narrowleaf pondweed<br />

(P. sp)<br />

Filamentous algae<br />

Depth<br />

0- 5 feet<br />

(n=13)<br />

Occur %<br />

Occur<br />

Depth<br />

6 - 10 feet<br />

(n= 13)<br />

Density Occur %<br />

Occur<br />

All Stations<br />

(n=26)<br />

Density Occur %<br />

Occur<br />

Density<br />

3 23 1.2 -- -- -- 3 12 1.2<br />

1 8 0.5 -- -- -- 1 4 0.5<br />

8 62 1.7 1 8 1.0 9 35 1.6<br />

3 23 1.3 --– --– -- 3 12 1.3<br />

1 8 0.5 -- -- -- 1 4 0.5<br />

2 15 1.0 -- -- -- 2 8 1.0<br />

1 8 1.0 -- -- -- 1 4 1.0<br />

12 92 2.7 13 100 2.8 25 96 2.8<br />

1 8 0.5 -- -- -- 1 4 0.5<br />

2 15 0.5 -- -- -- 2 8 0.5<br />

4 31 2.0 5 38 2.1 9 35 2.0<br />

Figure 4. <strong>Aquatic</strong> mammals were active<br />

on <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in 2008. Here muskrats<br />

have dislodged spatterdock roots. The<br />

roots are a good food source <strong>for</strong><br />

muskrats.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 4


Table 2. Individual transect data <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>for</strong> May 30, 2008.<br />

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7<br />

0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10<br />

White waterlily 1<br />

Marigold 0.5<br />

Coontail 2 0.5 1 2 2<br />

Chara 2 1<br />

Star duckweed 0.5<br />

Northern watermilfoil 1<br />

Cabbage<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed 2 2.3 2 1 2 1 2 4.5 2.5 3 3 4 4<br />

Claspingleaf pondweed<br />

Narrowleaf pondweed 0.5 0.5<br />

Filamentous algae 2 1.3 1 2 3<br />

T8 T8.5 T9 T10 T11 T11.5 T12 T13<br />

0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10<br />

White waterlily 1 1.5<br />

Marigold<br />

Coontail 1 1 2 3<br />

Chara 2 2 1<br />

Star duckweed<br />

Northern watermilfoil 1<br />

Cabbage 1<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed 3 1.5 2 4 3.5 5 4 1 3 4 2 2 4 1.5 2<br />

Claspingleaf pondweed 0.5<br />

Narrowleaf pondweed<br />

Filamentous algae 2 1 4 2<br />

Figure 5. Curlyleaf pondweed on<br />

the sample rake at a density <strong>of</strong> a<br />

‘2'.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 5


Results: August 13 -- Filamentous Algae Assessment<br />

In mid-summer <strong>of</strong> 2008, it was apparent that floating filamentous algae was more<br />

abundant compared to previous years. Although floating filamentous algae was above<br />

average in 2008, widespread benthic filamentous algae has been observed in <strong>Orchard</strong><br />

<strong>Lake</strong> <strong>for</strong> at least the previous five years. A map <strong>of</strong> benthic filamentous algae in <strong>Orchard</strong><br />

<strong>Lake</strong> on August 13, 2008 is shown in Figure 6.<br />

An unusual event occurred in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in 2008. The benthic algae on the southeast<br />

side <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>, lifted <strong>of</strong>f the bottom and floated to the lake surface. A significant<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> floating filamentous algae was blown into the shoreline area (Figure 7).<br />

Figure 6. Benthic filamentous algae map <strong>for</strong> August 13, 2008.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 6


In 2008, this was the first year since surveys have been conducted that the benthic algae<br />

came to the surface (Figure 7). A sample was examined under the microscope and<br />

determined to be a blue-green filamentous algae, Oscillatoria.<br />

It may be the exceptional water clarity <strong>of</strong> 2008 combined with other factors contributed to<br />

this type <strong>of</strong> event. The sediment release <strong>of</strong> the benthic filamentous algae is not expected<br />

to occur on an annual basis unless conditions are just right.<br />

Figure 7. [top - left] Some <strong>of</strong> the floating filamentous algae that collected on the south shoreline <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in 2008. [top - right] Close-up shot <strong>of</strong> the filamentous algae. [bottom - left] A rake<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> benthic (or bottom) filamentous algae. [bottom - right] The algae was examined under the<br />

microscope and magnified 125 times. It was a blue-green algae called Oscillatoria.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 7


Results: September 1 -- Late Summer Survey<br />

The dominant plant in the survey <strong>of</strong> September 1, 2008 in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> was coontail<br />

(Table 3). No Eurasian watermilfoil was found in this late summer survey. The<br />

occurrence and density <strong>of</strong> plants <strong>for</strong> each transect are shown in Table 4.<br />

Overall, aquatic plants grew out to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10 feet around much <strong>of</strong> the north end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lake, otherwise growth was out to the 6 or 7 foot water depth (Figure 5). A map <strong>of</strong><br />

aquatic plant coverage is shown in Figure 5. <strong>Aquatic</strong> plants covered about 120 acres,<br />

representing 51% <strong>of</strong> the 234 acre lake. Coontail continues to grow densely around the<br />

lake. Northern watermilfoil and chara were important plants in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in<br />

September <strong>of</strong> 2008.<br />

Figure 8. <strong>Aquatic</strong> plant coverage map <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> on September 1, 2008. The green area<br />

shows coverage <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 8


Table 3. <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> aquatic plant occurrences and densities <strong>for</strong> the September 1,<br />

2008 survey based on 14 transects and 2 depths, <strong>for</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 28 stations. Density<br />

ratings are 1-5 with 1 being low and 5 being most dense.<br />

Duckweed<br />

(Lemna sp)<br />

Spatterdock<br />

(Nuphar variegatum)<br />

W hite waterlily<br />

(Nymphaea tuberosa)<br />

Marigold<br />

(Bidens Beckii)<br />

Coontail<br />

(Ceratophyllum demersum)<br />

Chara<br />

(Chara sp)<br />

Star duckweed<br />

(Lemna trisulca)<br />

Northern watermilfoil<br />

(Myriophyllum sibiricum)<br />

Naiads<br />

(Najas flexilis)<br />

Cabbage<br />

(Potamogeton amplifolius)<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed<br />

(P. crispus)<br />

Claspingleaf pondweed<br />

(P. Richardsonii)<br />

Water celery<br />

(Vallisneria americana)<br />

Water stargrass<br />

(Zosterella dubia)<br />

filamentous algae<br />

Depth<br />

0 - 5 feet<br />

(n=14)<br />

Occur %<br />

Occur<br />

Depth<br />

6 - 10 feet<br />

(n= 14)<br />

Density Occur %<br />

Occur<br />

All Stations<br />

(n=28)<br />

Density Occur %<br />

Occur<br />

Density<br />

1 7 1.7 -- -- -- 1 4 1.7<br />

4 29 3.0 -- -- -- 4 14 3.0<br />

3 21 1.5 -- -- -- 3 11 1.5<br />

-- -- -- 1 7 1.0 1 4 1.0<br />

11 79 1.6 12 86 1.1 23 82 1.4<br />

4 29 2.5 3 21 1.0 7 25 1.9<br />

-- -- -- 1 7 0.5 1 4 0.5<br />

10 71 2.0 -- -- -- 10 36 2.0<br />

-- -- -- 1 7 1.0 1 4 1.0<br />

2 14 0.8 -- -- -- 2 7 0.8<br />

-- -- -- 3 21 0.4 3 11 0.4<br />

1 7 3.0 -- -- -- 1 4 3.0<br />

1 7 2.0 -- -- -- 1 4 2.0<br />

3 21 0.8 -- -- -- 3 11 0.8<br />

6 43 2.4 13 93 2.9 19 68 2.8<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 9


Table 4. Individual transect data <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>for</strong> September 1, 2008.<br />

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7<br />

0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10<br />

Duckweed<br />

Spatterdock<br />

White waterlily 2 1.5<br />

Marigold 1<br />

Coontail 3 0.3 1 1.5 1 3 2.5 1.5 2 1 0.5<br />

Chara 3<br />

Star duckweed<br />

Northern watermilfoil 1 1 3 3 0.5<br />

Naiads 1<br />

Cabbage 0.5<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed 0.5 0.5<br />

Claspingleaf pondweed 3<br />

Water celery 2<br />

Water stargrass 0.5<br />

Filamentous algae 2.5 3 4.5 2 2 2 1 2 2 2.5<br />

T8 T9 T10 T11 T11.5 T12 T13<br />

0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10 0 - 5 6 -10<br />

Duckweed 1.7<br />

Spatterdock 5 2 4 1<br />

White waterlily 1<br />

Marigold<br />

Coontail 2 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 0.3 1 0.5 2 1 2 2<br />

Chara 2 1 3 1 2 1<br />

Star duckweed 0.5<br />

Northern watermilfoil 2 1.5 3.8 2 2<br />

Naiads<br />

Cabbage 1<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed 0.3<br />

Claspingleaf pondweed<br />

Water celery<br />

Water stargrass 1 1<br />

Filamentous algae 2 2 4 3.5 3 4 4 2.3 4<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 10


Figure 9. [top] Sample rake with claspingleaf pondweed, coontail, and northern watermilfoil.<br />

[bottom] Waterlilies were common in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in 2008.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 11


Comparison <strong>of</strong> Early and Late Summer <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> in 2008<br />

In the early summer <strong>of</strong> 2008, curlyleaf pondweed was found around <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> and out<br />

to about 10 feet <strong>of</strong> water. The early summer survey in 2008 was conducted prior to<br />

mechanical harvesting and nuisance growth was observed in patches around <strong>Orchard</strong><br />

<strong>Lake</strong>. However, after harvesting in 2008, no nuisance curlyleaf pondweed was observed.<br />

By the beginning <strong>of</strong> September, curlyleaf pondweed had resprouted in several areas.<br />

Coontail was the most common plant followed by northern watermilfoil (Table 5). The<br />

acreage <strong>of</strong> aquatic submerged plants in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> decreased from early to late<br />

summer. As is typical, coontail increased from May to September. Coontail seemed to<br />

fill in areas where curlyleaf pondweed was found in early summer. Coontail was found to<br />

occasionally grow to heavy conditions in water depths <strong>of</strong> 4 to 5 feet.<br />

Table 5. The percent occurrence <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in 2008. Percent occurrence<br />

is calculated based on the number <strong>of</strong> times a plant species occurs at a sampling station on<br />

transects divided into the number <strong>of</strong> total stations <strong>for</strong> the survey. For example, if milfoil was<br />

found in 25 out <strong>of</strong> 50 stations, its percent occurrence would be 50%.<br />

May 30, 2008<br />

(% occur)<br />

September 1, 2008<br />

(% occur)<br />

Changes from<br />

May to September<br />

Duckweed<br />

(Lemna sp)<br />

0 4 +<br />

Spatterdock<br />

(Nuphar variegatum)<br />

0 14 +<br />

White waterlily<br />

(Nymphaea sp)<br />

12 11 0<br />

Marigold<br />

(Bidens Beckii)<br />

4 4 0<br />

Coontail<br />

(Ceratophyllum demersum)<br />

35 82 +<br />

Chara<br />

(Chara sp.)<br />

12 25 +<br />

Star duckweed<br />

(Lemna trisulca)<br />

4 4 0<br />

Northern watermilfoil<br />

(Myriophyllum sibiricum)<br />

8 36 +<br />

Naiads<br />

(Najas flexilis)<br />

0 4 +<br />

Cabbage<br />

(Potamogeton amplifolius)<br />

4 7 +<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed<br />

(P. crispus)<br />

96 11 -<br />

Claspingleaf pondweed<br />

(P. richardsonii)<br />

4 4 0<br />

Narrowleaf pondweed<br />

(P. sp)<br />

8 0 -<br />

Water celery<br />

(Vallisneria americana)<br />

0 4 +<br />

Water stargrass<br />

(Zosterella dubia)<br />

0 11 +<br />

Filamentous algae 35 68 +<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Submerged Species 9 11 +<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 12


Summary <strong>of</strong> Previous <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong><br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>ville has sponsored annual aquatic plant surveys since 1999. A summary<br />

<strong>of</strong> the percent occurrence <strong>of</strong> individual species on a lakewide basis is shown in Table 6.<br />

Since 1995, it appears that six submerged species have increased and four species have<br />

decreased. Six species are found sparingly or have not changed in abundance. The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> submerged species found in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> has remained about the same since<br />

1995 (Table 6).<br />

The beach at <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 13


Table 6. The percent occurrence <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>for</strong> 1995 and 1999 through 2008. Mechanical harvesting has occurred from 2004 to 2008<br />

(blue shading). Changes in plant abundance are rated as: + = increase, -- = decrease, 0 = no significant change (1995 data are from Barr Engineering Company,<br />

Diagnostic Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>, 1999).<br />

Duckweed<br />

(Lemna sp)<br />

Spatterdock<br />

(Nuphar variegatum)<br />

White waterlily<br />

(Nymphaea sp)<br />

Marsh marigold<br />

(Bidens beckii)<br />

Coontail<br />

(Ceratophyllum<br />

demersum)<br />

Chara<br />

(Chara sp.)<br />

Star duckweed<br />

(Lemna trisulca)<br />

Northern watermilfoil<br />

(Myriophyllum<br />

sibiricum)<br />

Naiads<br />

(Najas sp)<br />

Nitella<br />

(Nitella sp)<br />

Cabbage<br />

(Potamogeton<br />

amplifolius)<br />

Curlyleaf pondweed<br />

(P. crispus)<br />

Illinois pondweed<br />

(P. illinoensis)<br />

Stringy pondweed<br />

(P. pusillus)<br />

Claspingleaf<br />

pondweed<br />

(P. richardsonii)<br />

Narrowleaf<br />

pondweed<br />

(P. sp)<br />

Flatstem pondweed<br />

(P. zosteri<strong>for</strong>mis)<br />

Buttercup<br />

(Ranunculus sp)<br />

Sago pondweed<br />

(Stuckenia<br />

pectinatus)<br />

Water celery<br />

(Vallisneria<br />

americana)<br />

Water stargrass<br />

(Zosterella dubia)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

submerged species<br />

June 16,<br />

1995<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

57<br />

stations)<br />

June 5,<br />

1999<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

May 26,<br />

2000<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

June 8,<br />

2001<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

May 31,<br />

2002<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

42<br />

stations)<br />

May 17,<br />

2003<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

June 7,<br />

2004<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

24<br />

stations)<br />

May 21,<br />

2005<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

26<br />

stations)<br />

May 26,<br />

2006<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

30<br />

stations)<br />

May 22,<br />

2007<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

26<br />

stations)<br />

May 30,<br />

2008<br />

% Occur<br />

(based<br />

pm 26<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 20,<br />

1995<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

57<br />

stations)<br />

-- – -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 -- -- 4 0<br />

-- 5 10 5 5 8 13 15 10 12 -- -- 10 8 8 10 8 12 13 10 12 14 0<br />

-- 5 3 3 7 5 4 -- 7 12 12 -- 8 13 12 10 13 27 17 17 19 11 +<br />

-- -- -- -- 5 -- -- -- -- -- 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 0<br />

12 18 28 74 38 38 88 62 13 27 35 74 85 56 88 90 90 100 90 93 88 82 +<br />

12 13 13 28 12 10 4 15 10 8 12 18 26 8 27 10 5 19 13 17 19 25 +<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7 8 4 -- -- 3 -- 5 5 8 17 17 15 4 +<br />

18 23 3 41 12 3 25 19 33 12 8 21 5 23 46 33 13 54 33 27 27 36 +<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13 -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 -- -- 4 0<br />

-- -- -- -- 2 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0<br />

5 8 3 13 14 10 13 19 33 31 4 8 3 13 23 10 8 27 27 27 19 7 -<br />

98 74 95 92 74 100 92 96 100 100 96 55 -- 23 4 5 26 -- 7 -- 4 11 -<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0<br />

-- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0<br />

9 5 -- 10 5 -- -- -- 7 4 4 18 3 5 8 3 8 8 -- 7 4 4 0<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --<br />

2 -- -- 5 -- -- 4 -- 7 -- -- 13 5 -- 4 8 -- 4 3 -- -- -- 0<br />

-- 8 3 -- -- 3 4 12 3 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- -- -<br />

4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 -- 8 4 -- -- 8 3 3 -- -- 0<br />

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 13 12 13 3 12 4 +<br />

4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 27 13 3 8 11 +<br />

9 7 6 8 8 7 7 6 9 8 9 9 6 10 8 9 10 11 11 9 9 11<br />

Aug 14,<br />

1999<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Oct 6,<br />

2000<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Sept 17,<br />

2001<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Sept 8,<br />

2002<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 20,<br />

2003<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

39<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 29,<br />

2004<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

26<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 22,<br />

2005<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

30<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 21,<br />

2006<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

30<br />

stations)<br />

Aug 26,<br />

2007<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

26<br />

stations)<br />

Sept 1,<br />

2008<br />

% Occur<br />

(based on<br />

28<br />

stations)<br />

Change<br />

from 1995<br />

to 2007<br />

(spring<br />

and fall)<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 14


Summary <strong>of</strong> Previous Curlyleaf Pondweed <strong>Surveys</strong><br />

Curlyleaf coverage has stayed about the same, going back to 1999 although there may be<br />

a slight decrease in water depths <strong>of</strong> 6 to 10 feet from 2004 - 2008 (Table 7 and Figures<br />

10-16). The pattern appears to be that curlyleaf pondweed declines from spring to late<br />

summer and coontail increases. The abundance <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf pondweed nuisance growth<br />

varies from year to year. Nuisance growth was especially heavy in 1999 and 2002 due in<br />

part, to late onset <strong>of</strong> lake ice, lack <strong>of</strong> snow, and early ice out. Harvesting from 2004<br />

through 2008 has reduced the acres <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf nuisance growth (Figures 10-16).<br />

Additional sampling results using scuba diving to quantify stem densities at two locations<br />

show that curlyleaf stem densities decreased with harvesting from 2004 through 2006,<br />

with an increase in 2007 and then a decrease in 2008 (Table 7).<br />

Table 7. Summary <strong>of</strong> the density <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf pondweed <strong>for</strong> the early summer surveys <strong>of</strong><br />

1999 through 2008. Blue shading indicates years <strong>of</strong> mechanical harvesting.<br />

Survey Date<br />

1999<br />

(June 5)<br />

2000<br />

(May 26)<br />

2001<br />

(June 8)<br />

2002<br />

(May 21)<br />

2003<br />

(May 17)<br />

2004<br />

(June 7)<br />

(post harvest)<br />

2005<br />

(May 21)<br />

(pre-harvest)<br />

2006<br />

(May 26)<br />

(pre-harvest)<br />

2007<br />

(May 22)<br />

(pre-harvest)<br />

2008<br />

(May 30)<br />

(pre-harvest)<br />

Average Early Summer Curlyleaf Density<br />

(0-5- scale)<br />

0-5 ft<br />

Depth<br />

6-10 ft<br />

Depth<br />

11-15 ft<br />

Depth<br />

All<br />

Stations<br />

Stem Densities in<br />

Known Dense CLP<br />

Area That Has Been<br />

Harvested (stems/m 2 )<br />

(5-feet) (n=20)<br />

3.4 4.6 3.8 4.0 ND<br />

4.0 3.9 2.2 3.4 ND<br />

2.5 2.8 2.8 2.7 ND<br />

3.8 4.1 2.0 3.6 ND<br />

3.5 4.0 2.6 3.4 436<br />

2.1 2.5 0 2.3 403<br />

2.1 3.1 0 2.6 407<br />

3.6 3.2 0 3.4 341<br />

3.9 2.7 0 3.3 514<br />

2.7 2.8 0 2.8 360<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 15


Figure 10. 2002 early summer aquatic<br />

plant coverage. Nuisance curlyleaf<br />

pondweed is shown in red.<br />

Figure 11. 2003 early summer aquatic<br />

plant coverage. Curlyleaf was found<br />

growing out to 15 feet <strong>of</strong> water depth.<br />

Nuisance curlyleaf pondweed is shown<br />

in red and covered about 70 acres.<br />

Figure 12. 2004 early summer aquatic<br />

plant coverage. Nuisance curlyleaf<br />

pondweed is shown in red after<br />

harvesting was completed. Harvesting<br />

significantly decreased the acreage <strong>of</strong><br />

nuisance growth.<br />

Figure 13. 2005 early summer aquatic<br />

plant coverage. Curlyleaf was found<br />

growing out to 10 feet <strong>of</strong> water depth.<br />

Nuisance curlyleaf pondweed did not<br />

appear in 2005 due to the harvesting.<br />

Figure 14. 2006 early summer aquatic<br />

plant coverage. Nuisance curlyleaf<br />

pondweed is shown in red be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

harvesting was completed. After<br />

harvesting was completed curlyleaf<br />

pondweed was greatly reduced.<br />

Figure 15. 2007 early summer aquatic<br />

plant coverage. Nuisance curlyleaf<br />

pondweed is shown in red shading be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

harvesting.<br />

Figure 16. 2008 early summer aquatic<br />

plant coverage. Curlyleaf was found<br />

growing out to 11 feet. Nuisance curlyleaf<br />

pondweed, shown in red, was present in<br />

two locations.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 16


Summary <strong>of</strong> Curlyleaf Pondweed Densities from 1999 - 2008<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>ville has sponsored annual early summer aquatic plant surveys on<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>for</strong> the last ten years, from 1999 through 2008. For each survey, the same<br />

transect locations and depth zones were used (Figure 17). A curlyleaf density was<br />

assigned at each depth on a transect, each year. A density rating <strong>of</strong> 1 - 5 was used with 5<br />

being the most dense, where plants were matted at the surface.<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf pondweed densities <strong>for</strong> individual depths on all transects <strong>for</strong> each<br />

survey is shown in Figure 18. This chart shows that <strong>Orchard</strong> lake has numerous areas <strong>of</strong><br />

high density curlyleaf pondweed growth. There is also a fair amount <strong>of</strong> variability from<br />

year to year as the number <strong>of</strong> red squares on a survey (indicative <strong>of</strong> high density) ranges<br />

from 3 to 23. Since harvesting began, the average number <strong>of</strong> red squares/survey has<br />

averaged 9 <strong>for</strong> harvesting years verses 17 <strong>for</strong> pre-harvesting years.<br />

It appears the variability <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf from year to year is influenced by climatic factors<br />

whereas the variability <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf within a lake is influenced by the sediment<br />

composition.<br />

Density ratings and growth categories <strong>for</strong> light, moderate, and heavy growth are shown in<br />

Figure 19.<br />

Figure 17. <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> aquatic plant transect locations.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 17


Curlyleaf Pondweed Density Summary <strong>for</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong><br />

Transect<br />

Depth<br />

1999<br />

Jun 5<br />

2000<br />

May 26<br />

2001<br />

Jun 8<br />

2002<br />

May 31<br />

2003<br />

May 17<br />

2004<br />

Jun 7<br />

2005<br />

May 21<br />

2006<br />

May 26<br />

2007<br />

May 22<br />

2008<br />

May 30<br />

Average<br />

% Red<br />

>50%<br />

Predicted<br />

growth based<br />

on lake soils<br />

S 5 5 2 5 5 2.5 4 3 1.5 2 3.5 50 Moderate<br />

1<br />

M 5 5 2 3.5 4.5 3.5 4 3.5 2.5 3 3.6 40<br />

D 3 2 2 X 4 X X X X 1 2.4 10<br />

S 5 5 4 5 2.5 0 2 4 3.3 0 3.1 50 Moderate<br />

2<br />

M 5 5 4 4 3 2 4 3.8 4 2 3.7 70 Heavy<br />

D 4 2 4 X 3 X X X X 0 2.6 20<br />

S 5 4 2 4 2 0.5 1 4 1 1 2.5 40 Heavy<br />

3<br />

M 0 5 2.5 4 5 2 2 3.3 3 2 2.9 30 Heavy<br />

D 0 3 2.5 4 4 X X X X 0 2.3 20<br />

S 3 3 3 1 3 2 0.5 2 2 1 2.1 0 Heavy<br />

4<br />

M 5 4 3 3.5 4 1 1.3 2.3 3.3 2 2.9 30<br />

D 4 3 3 1 3 X X X X 2 2.5 10<br />

S 5 0 3 4 4 4.5 0 5 5 4.5 3.5 70 Heavy<br />

5<br />

M 5 4 3.5 4.5 4 4 3 3.6 2.5 4 3.8 60 Moderate<br />

D 0 2 3.5 2 3 X X X X 1 1.9 0<br />

S 5 5 0 5 4 4.5 3 2.5 4 1 3.4 60<br />

6<br />

M 0 5 3 4.5 4 3.5 4 2 2.5 4 3.2 50 Heavy<br />

D 0 1.5 3 2 3 X X X X X 1.9 0<br />

S 1 5 0 3 5 0.5 2 5 4.5 4 3.0 50<br />

7<br />

M 4 3 3 4 4.5 2 3.5 4 2 4 3.4 50 Heavy<br />

D 0 2 3 X 2 X X X X X 1.8 0<br />

S 2 3 0 2 1 X 3 5 5 3 2.7 20 Heavy<br />

8<br />

M 5 2 1 2.5 2 X 1.5 2.5 1 2 2.2 10<br />

D 4 2 1 1 1 X X X X 1 1.7 10<br />

S 1 5 1 4 5 1.5 3 5 4.5 4 3.4 60<br />

9<br />

M 4 3 3 4.5 4 2.5 4 3.3 3 4 3.6 50 Heavy<br />

D 4 2 3 X 2 X X X X 3 2.8 10<br />

S 4 2 1 5 4 0 1 4 4 5 3.0 60<br />

10<br />

M 5 2.5 3 5 4 2.5 4 2.5 3 4 3.6 50 Heavy<br />

D 4 2 3 X 2 X X X X X 2.8 10<br />

S 1 1 2 3 4 2 2 4 4 1 2.4 30<br />

11<br />

M 4 4 3 4 4 2 3.5 3.2 2.5 4 3.4 50 Heavy<br />

D 0 3 3 X 2 X X X X X 2.0 0<br />

S 4 5 4 5 4 2 3 2.3 4.5 2 3.6 60<br />

12<br />

M 5 5 4 5 4.5 2 4 2.8 2.8 4 3.9 70 Heavy<br />

D 0 2 4 X 2 X X X X X 2.0 10<br />

S 0 0 2.5 4 2 0.5 1 1 4 1.5 1.7 20<br />

13<br />

M 4 5 1 5 4 3.5 4 4 3 2 3.6 60 Heavy<br />

D 0 2 1 X 3 X X X X X 1.5 0<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Reds 23 16 6 20 21 3 8 11 10 11 8 17<br />

Avg CLP Density 4.0 3.4 2.7 3.6 3.4 2.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.8<br />

Depth Zones:<br />

S = 0 - 5 feet<br />

M = 6 - 10 feet<br />

D = 11 - 15 feet<br />

Figure 18. Summary <strong>of</strong> curlyleaf pondweed density <strong>for</strong> early summer aquatic plant surveys<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> from 1999 - 2008. Curlyleaf density is shown on a scale from 1 - 5 (with 5<br />

being most dense) <strong>for</strong> each depth zone on all 13 transects <strong>for</strong> each survey. An “X” in a box<br />

means no sample at that depth. Colors are coded <strong>for</strong> density. Blue shading <strong>for</strong> 2004 - 2008<br />

indicates years <strong>of</strong> harvesting. A sediment survey was conducted on <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> in 2001<br />

(orange shaded box). Predicted curlyleaf growth (far right column) has been close to actual<br />

curlyleaf growth conditions.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 18


Curlyleaf Pondweed Growth Characteristics<br />

Light Growth Conditions<br />

<strong>Plant</strong>s rarely reach the surface.<br />

Navigation and recreational activities<br />

are not generally hindered.<br />

Stem density: 0 - 160 stems/m 2<br />

Biomass: 0 - 50 g-dry wt/m 2<br />

Estimated TP loading: 300 g-dry wt/m 2<br />

Estimated TP loading: >6.7 lbs/ac<br />

MnDNR rake sample density has a scale from 1 to 4. For certain growth conditions where plants top out at the<br />

surface, the scale has been extended: 4.5 is equivalent to a near solid surface canopy and a 5 is equivalent to a<br />

solid surface canopy. Heavy growth conditions have rake densities <strong>of</strong> a 4 (early to mid-season with the potential<br />

to reach the surface), 4.5, or 5.<br />

Figure 19. Curlyleaf pondweed characteristics <strong>for</strong> three growth conditions.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 19


Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> Water Quality<br />

In 2008, summer averages <strong>for</strong> clarity (using a Secchi disc), phosphorus, and algae (using<br />

chlorophyll analysis) were some <strong>of</strong> the best on record (Table 8). <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> is not in<br />

the impaired status category. Impaired criteria are shown in Table 9.<br />

Table 8. Water quality summary <strong>for</strong> <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>. Data are May-September<br />

averages from the Met Council CAMP program. Blue shading represents years <strong>of</strong><br />

significant curlyleaf pondweed harvesting.<br />

Secchi Disc<br />

(m)<br />

Total Phosphorus<br />

(ppb)<br />

Chlorophyll a<br />

(ppb)<br />

1980 2 40 16<br />

1981 3 26 11<br />

1983 2.9 31 11<br />

1987 1.8 -- --<br />

1988 2.3 -- --<br />

1989 2.1 28 14<br />

1990 1 -- --<br />

1991 1.9 -- --<br />

1993 2 35 17<br />

1995 1.3 44 31<br />

1996 2.3 28 15<br />

1998 1.9 38 24<br />

1999 2.1 34 30<br />

2000 2 39 20<br />

2001 2.3 25 13<br />

2004 2.6 38 17<br />

2005 2.4 32 12<br />

2006 2.2 34 14<br />

2007 1.6 41 23<br />

2008 3.0 24 11<br />

Table 9. MPCA nutrient criteria <strong>for</strong> impaired lakes (MPCA 2005). <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> is<br />

a deep lake. Water quality results indicate <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> is not in the impaired<br />

category.<br />

Secchi Disc<br />

(m)<br />

Total Phosphorus<br />

(ppb)<br />

Chlorophyll a<br />

(ppb)<br />

Shallow <strong>Lake</strong> >1.0


Recommendations <strong>for</strong> Curlyleaf Pondweed in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong><br />

The aquatic plant community in <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> is fairly diverse and 11 submerged aquatic<br />

plant species were observed in September <strong>of</strong> 2008. Native plants cover about 62% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lake bottom in summer. If native plant distribution is maintained, water clarity should<br />

remain high as well. Because the curlyleaf pondweed dieback contributes phosphorus<br />

and can increase algal growth, continuing the curlyleaf pondweed control program is<br />

recommended. The harvesting program was initiated in 2004. Harvesting has the<br />

potential to have a positive affect on water quality and would be beneficial to continue. In<br />

addition to harvesting, another curlyleaf control technique was initiated in 2004 which<br />

involved the use <strong>of</strong> iron filings to control nuisance curlyleaf growth in two one-acre test<br />

plots. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> that demonstration project will be evaluated again in 2009. If<br />

iron treatment shows ongoing curlyleaf control and if it is permitted <strong>for</strong> use, an iron<br />

treatment area should be expanded in front <strong>of</strong> the city park and landing.<br />

<strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Surveys</strong> <strong>for</strong> 2008 21


Appendix<br />

Transect Descriptions and<br />

Lowrance x-16 Sonar Graphs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aquatic</strong> <strong>Plant</strong>s<br />

A Lowrance X16 sonar was used to record plant canopies on <strong>Orchard</strong> <strong>Lake</strong>.


Transect Descriptions<br />

Transect<br />

1 Gray house next to landing.<br />

st<br />

2 1 house north <strong>of</strong> landing.<br />

3 Big boulder wall, gray house behind.<br />

4 Natural shoreline be<strong>for</strong>e peninsula.<br />

5 Head into corner.<br />

Description<br />

6 Fringe <strong>of</strong> natural area with picnic tables at the back. Right <strong>of</strong> rock rip-rap.<br />

7 Two willows next to rad house.<br />

8 Gray, 3 story house next to road.<br />

9 Private beach where road goes up.<br />

10 Two tier rock wall.<br />

11 Right <strong>of</strong> the beach.<br />

11.5 Big boulder wall, tan house 20 feet from shore.<br />

12 Left <strong>of</strong> house with stone and iron fence.<br />

13 East (left)<strong>of</strong> spit, going into lily beds.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!