09.05.2015 Views

Papilsky Rules - Latham & Watkins

Papilsky Rules - Latham & Watkins

Papilsky Rules - Latham & Watkins

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Number 1069 August 5, 2010<br />

Client Alert<br />

<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong><br />

Corporate Department<br />

New FINRA Rule 5141 to Replace Current<br />

“<strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>” Relating to the Sale of<br />

Securities in Fixed Price Offerings<br />

“However, in<br />

addition to<br />

modifying policies<br />

and procedures<br />

to reflect the<br />

provisions of the<br />

new rule and<br />

the elimination<br />

of certain of the<br />

requirements of<br />

the old <strong>Papilsky</strong><br />

<strong>Rules</strong>, members<br />

should also be<br />

reviewing their<br />

underwriting<br />

agreements<br />

and related<br />

documents to<br />

make appropriate<br />

changes.”<br />

On July 21, 2010, the Securities and<br />

Exchange Commission approved a<br />

proposal by the Financial Industry<br />

Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA<br />

and formerly, the National Association<br />

of Securities Dealers, Inc. or NASD)<br />

to delete current NASD <strong>Rules</strong> 2730,<br />

2740 and 2750 (commonly known as<br />

the <strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>) and adopt in their<br />

stead new FINRA Rule 5141. 1 NASD<br />

Rule 0120(h), which defines the term<br />

“fixed price offering” for purposes<br />

of the <strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>, and associated<br />

NASD interpretive materials set forth in<br />

IM-2730, IM-2740 and IM-2750 are also<br />

being eliminated in connection with the<br />

adoption of FINRA Rule 5141. 2<br />

FINRA has not yet indicated the<br />

effective date for the new rule.<br />

Background<br />

The stated purpose of the <strong>Papilsky</strong><br />

<strong>Rules</strong> was to “protect the integrity of<br />

fixed price offerings by ensuring that<br />

securities in such offerings are sold to<br />

the public at the stated public offering<br />

price or prices, thereby preventing an<br />

undisclosed better price.” 3 The <strong>Papilsky</strong><br />

<strong>Rules</strong> were designed to prevent FINRA<br />

members from discounting the price of<br />

securities sold in a fixed price offering<br />

below the stated public offering price or<br />

prices.<br />

In particular, the <strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong><br />

provided that:<br />

• FINRA members who purchase or<br />

arrange for the purchase of “securities<br />

taken in trade” in a fixed price<br />

offering must purchase (or arrange for<br />

the purchase of) the securities taken<br />

in trade at a fair market price at the<br />

time of purchase. (NASD Rule 2730). 4<br />

• FINRA members may not grant any<br />

selling concessions, discounts or other<br />

allowances in connection with a fixed<br />

price offering to anyone other than a<br />

broker or dealer that is participating<br />

in the distribution of the offering.<br />

(NASD Rule 2740). 5<br />

• FINRA members may not retain<br />

securities sold in a fixed price<br />

offering for their own accounts or<br />

sell such securities to certain of<br />

their affiliates or “related persons”<br />

unless the member has made a bona<br />

fide offering of the securities to the<br />

public and has been unable to sell<br />

the securities in such offering at the<br />

stated fixed price. (NASD Rule 2750). 6<br />

New FINRA Rule 5141<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 will replace certain<br />

outdated requirements of the <strong>Papilsky</strong><br />

<strong>Rules</strong> and simplify their provisions while<br />

still preserving the primary purpose<br />

of the original rules (i.e., protecting<br />

<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated<br />

limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Singapore and an affiliated partnership<br />

conducting the practice in Hong Kong and Japan. <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> practices in Saudi Arabia in association with the Law Office of<br />

Mohammed Al-Sheikh. Under New York’s Code of Professional Responsibility, portions of this communication contain attorney advertising.<br />

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation. Please direct all<br />

inquiries regarding our conduct under New York’s Disciplinary <strong>Rules</strong> to <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> LLP, 885 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022-4834,<br />

Phone: +1.212.906.1200. © Copyright 2010 <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong>. All Rights Reserved.


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

the integrity of the fixed price offering<br />

process).<br />

Specifically, as approved by the SEC,<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 provides that no<br />

FINRA member that:<br />

participates in a selling syndicate or<br />

selling group or that acts as the single<br />

underwriter in connection with a fixed<br />

price offering shall offer or grant,<br />

directly or indirectly, to any person or<br />

account that is not a member of such<br />

selling syndicate or selling group or<br />

that is a person or account other than<br />

the single underwriter any securities<br />

in the offering at a price below the<br />

stated public offering price (reduced<br />

price). 7<br />

FINRA Rule 5141(b) states, however,<br />

that this general prohibition will not<br />

impact the ability of members of a<br />

selling syndicate or selling group to<br />

purchase and sell securities in the<br />

offering among themselves. Moreover,<br />

dispensing with the prohibition currently<br />

contained in NASD Rule 2750, new<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 expressly permits<br />

(subject to the restrictions contained in<br />

FINRA Rule 5130) 8 a single underwriter<br />

or member of the selling syndicate or<br />

selling group to sell securities in the<br />

offering to an affiliated person so long<br />

as the affiliated person purchases the<br />

securities at the fixed public offering<br />

price and not at a “reduced price.” 9<br />

Supplementary material provided in<br />

respect of FINRA Rule 5141 clarifies<br />

that the term “reduced price” includes,<br />

without limitation, the offer or grant<br />

of any “selling concession, discount<br />

or other allowance, credit, rebate,<br />

reduction of any fee (including any<br />

advisory or service fee), any sale of<br />

products or services at prices below<br />

reasonable commercially available rates<br />

for similar products and services . . .<br />

or any purchase of or arrangement to<br />

purchase securities from the person or<br />

account at more than their fair market<br />

price in exchange for securities in the<br />

offering.” 10<br />

The new rule continues to provide an<br />

exception with respect to the provision<br />

of “research.” In particular, FINRA<br />

Rule 5141 will not prevent a member<br />

from selling securities in a fixed price<br />

offering to a person or account to which<br />

it has provided research so long as the<br />

recipient of the research pays the stated<br />

public offering price for the securities<br />

and the research is provided pursuant to<br />

the requirements of Section 28(e) of the<br />

Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 11<br />

The new rule also provides guidance<br />

to FINRA members that also serve as<br />

investment advisers, noting that such<br />

a member “may exempt securities<br />

that are purchased as part of a fixed<br />

price offering from the calculation of<br />

annual or periodic asset-based fees that<br />

such member charges to a customer,<br />

provided such exemption is part of the<br />

member’s normal and ordinary course<br />

of business with the customer and is<br />

not in connection with an offering.” 12<br />

Although the new rule does not address<br />

the alternative practice employed by<br />

certain participating members whereby<br />

two fixed public offering prices are<br />

disclosed — one price that includes the<br />

full underwriting discount and a second<br />

price that excludes all or a portion of the<br />

underwriting discount and is applicable<br />

to those purchasers who already pay<br />

asset-based fees to the selling member<br />

— it would appear that this alternative<br />

practice should also continue to be<br />

permitted under the new rule provided<br />

the multiple fixed prices are adequately<br />

disclosed in the prospectus or other<br />

offering document.<br />

Practical Impact of the Rule<br />

Change<br />

FINRA has not yet indicated the<br />

implementation date for new FINRA<br />

Rule 5141. However, in addition to<br />

modifying policies and procedures to<br />

reflect the provisions of the new rule<br />

and the elimination of certain of the<br />

requirements of the old <strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>,<br />

2 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

members should also be reviewing<br />

their underwriting agreements and<br />

related documents to make appropriate<br />

changes.<br />

Significantly, unlike NASD Rule<br />

2740(c), FINRA Rule 5141 does not<br />

require members to obtain the written<br />

agreement of non-US broker-dealers<br />

participating in a fixed price offering<br />

to comply with the provisions of the<br />

<strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong> and NASD Rule 2420. 13<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 also does not require<br />

members to make quarterly filings with<br />

FINRA with respect to designated sales,<br />

nor does it require specific records to be<br />

kept and maintained by members that<br />

are designated by their customers to<br />

receive selling credit as now required by<br />

NASD Rule 2740 (although FINRA does<br />

note that such members remain subject<br />

to other applicable FINRA and SEC<br />

recordkeeping requirements). 14<br />

Moreover, new FINRA Rule 5141 may<br />

permit the establishment of certain<br />

referral and advisory arrangements<br />

previously thought to be prohibited<br />

by the literal words of current NASD<br />

Rule 2740. In particular, outside the<br />

parameters of an interpretive letter<br />

issued by FINRA (then NASD) staff<br />

in 2003, 15 most referral and advisory<br />

arrangements between a FINRA<br />

member that was participating in a<br />

fixed price offering and another entity<br />

that was not itself a broker-dealer that<br />

was also participating in the offering<br />

were thought to be impermissible<br />

under NASD Rule 2740 since the<br />

arrangement, if it involved the payment<br />

of compensation based on or tied to the<br />

amount of compensation received by<br />

the FINRA member in the fixed price<br />

offering, could be viewed as the grant<br />

(or sharing) of a concession or “other<br />

allowance” in connection with the fixed<br />

price offering. It now appears, however,<br />

that such an arrangement would not<br />

be prohibited by new FINRA Rule<br />

5141, provided it does not, directly or<br />

indirectly, confer a “reduced price” in<br />

respect of any securities purchased or<br />

sold in the offering, and, accordingly,<br />

should be permissible to the extent<br />

the terms of the arrangement are not<br />

inconsistent with NASD Rule 2420<br />

(or, assuming it is ultimately adopted,<br />

proposed FINRA Rule 2040) or any other<br />

applicable laws, rules and regulations.<br />

Finally, it is worth noting that new<br />

FINRA Rule 5141 provides that the<br />

prohibition with respect to selling the<br />

offered securities at a “reduced price”<br />

applies only “until the termination of<br />

the offering or until a member, having<br />

made a bona fide public offering of the<br />

securities, is unable to continue selling<br />

such securities at the stated public<br />

offering price.” 16 This language should<br />

preserve the ability of underwriters to<br />

change the initial offering price shown<br />

on the cover of the prospectus from<br />

time to time if they are unable to sell<br />

all the offered securities at such initial<br />

fixed offering price and, in connection<br />

with under-subscribed offerings, should<br />

continue to permit underwriters to<br />

place securities they are unable to<br />

sell to the public in the offering in an<br />

investment account or with an affiliate<br />

without running afoul of the rule. 17<br />

Accordingly, new FINRA Rule 5141<br />

should not change customary practices<br />

in connection with “sticky” deals.<br />

3 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

Endnotes<br />

1<br />

See SEC Release No. 34-62539; File No.<br />

SR-FINRA-2010-029 (July 21, 2010). NASD<br />

<strong>Rules</strong> 2730, 2740 and 2750 are generally<br />

referred to as the “<strong>Papilsky</strong> <strong>Rules</strong>” because<br />

of the court decision with which they are often<br />

associated, <strong>Papilsky</strong> v. Berndt, Fed. Sec. L. Rep<br />

(CCH) 95,627 (S.D.N.Y. June 24, 1976).<br />

FINRA issued a notice to its members relating<br />

to the proposed rule on August 4, 2009 and<br />

originally submitted the rule proposal to the<br />

SEC shortly thereafter, but then withdrew it<br />

for technical reasons in November 2009. The<br />

proposed rule was re-submitted to the SEC,<br />

without substantive change, on May 27, 2010.<br />

See FINRA Regulatory Notice 09-45 (August<br />

2009) (FINRA Notice 09-45); SEC Release<br />

No. 34-62299 (June 16, 2010) (the Proposing<br />

Release).<br />

2<br />

The definition of “fixed price offering” is now set<br />

forth in the supplementary materials to FINRA<br />

Rule 5141 and is essentially unchanged from<br />

the definition currently set forth in NASD Rule<br />

0120(h). As so defined, the term “fixed price<br />

offering” refers to securities publicly offered<br />

(in whole or in part) in the United States at a<br />

stated offering price or prices. See FINRA Rule<br />

5141.04. The term includes offerings registered<br />

in the United States under the Securities Act<br />

of 1933, as well as offerings that, although<br />

public, are not required to be registered under<br />

the Securities Act pursuant to an applicable<br />

exemption (e.g., bank securities offered pursuant<br />

to Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act). The<br />

term, however, does not include offerings of<br />

securities that are privately placed or offered and<br />

sold pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities<br />

Act. It is also important to note that the term<br />

“fixed price offering” does not prohibit “multiple<br />

price” offerings so long as the different fixed<br />

prices are adequately disclosed. See Proposing<br />

Release; NASD Notice to Members 81-3.<br />

3<br />

FINRA Notice 09-45.<br />

4<br />

NASD Rule 2730 was intended to prevent<br />

members from paying a higher price for the<br />

securities taken in trade, thereby lowering the<br />

purchase price of the securities purchased by<br />

the investor in the fixed price offering.<br />

5<br />

The purpose of NASD Rule 2740 was to prevent<br />

members from granting discounts to favored<br />

investors, such that those investors would be<br />

able to purchase securities in the offering at a<br />

lower price than other investors.<br />

6<br />

NASD Rule 2750 was intended to prevent<br />

purchasers from obtaining a discount through the<br />

establishment of an affiliated broker-dealer that<br />

would receive designated selling credit for the<br />

sale.<br />

7<br />

FINRA Rule 5141(a).<br />

8<br />

FINRA Rule 5130 generally prohibits FINRA<br />

members from selling equity securities offered<br />

in initial public offerings to certain “restricted<br />

persons” (a term which includes, among others,<br />

broker-dealers and certain persons having a<br />

beneficial interest in a broker-dealer).<br />

9<br />

FINRA Rule 5141.03 provides that ordinary<br />

course transactions between a member and its<br />

affiliates that are unrelated to the purchase or<br />

sale of securities in a fixed price offering will not<br />

be deemed to confer a “reduced price” under the<br />

rule.<br />

10<br />

FINRA Rule 5141.01.<br />

11<br />

FINRA Rule 5141.02.<br />

12<br />

FINRA Rule 5141.05.<br />

13<br />

The adoption of FINRA Rule 5141 does not<br />

impact existing NASD Rule 2420 (Dealing with<br />

Non-Members), although such rule is the subject<br />

of another pending FINRA rule proposal. See<br />

FINRA Regulatory Notice 09-69 (December<br />

2009) (proposing, among other things, to delete<br />

current NASD Rule 2420 and replace it with new<br />

FINRA Rule 2040) (FINRA Notice 09-69).<br />

Also note that current NASD Rule 2420(c)<br />

continues to require an agreement by any<br />

non-US broker-dealer that receives a selling<br />

concession, discount or other allowance from<br />

a FINRA member to agree to the restrictions<br />

set forth in the rule as if it were itself a FINRA<br />

member in respect of any sales of securities<br />

it makes to persons in the United States. The<br />

FINRA proposal discussed in FINRA Notice<br />

09-69 would eliminate this requirement and<br />

further simplify the provisions of existing NASD<br />

Rule 2420. In particular, if adopted as proposed,<br />

new FINRA Rule 2040 would (in pertinent part)<br />

prohibit members from, directly or indirectly,<br />

paying or offering to pay any “compensation,<br />

fees, concessions, discounts, commissions or<br />

other allowances to . . . any person that is not<br />

registered as a broker-dealer under Section<br />

15(a) of the Exchange Act but, by reason of<br />

receipt of any such payments, is required to be<br />

so registered under applicable federal securities<br />

laws and [Exchange Act] rules, regulations and<br />

published guidance issued by the SEC or its<br />

staff in the form of releases, no-action letters or<br />

interpretations.” See FINRA Notice 09-69.<br />

4 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

14<br />

See, e.g., <strong>Rules</strong> 17a-3 and 17a-4 under the<br />

Exchange Act.<br />

15<br />

See Interpretive Letter to Dana Fleischman<br />

issued November 24, 2003 (permitting certain<br />

types of advisory and/or referral payments to<br />

non-participating broker-dealers under certain<br />

circumstances) available at http://www.finra.org/<br />

Industry/Regulation/Guidance/InterpretiveLetters/<br />

P002636<br />

16<br />

FINRA Rule 5141(a). Similar to current NASD<br />

Rule 2750(d), securities offered for sale in a<br />

fixed price offering are presumed salable for<br />

purposes of FINRA Rule 5141 “if the securities<br />

immediately trade in the secondary market at a<br />

price or prices which are above the stated public<br />

offering price.” Note, however, that under NASD<br />

Rule 2750, the presumption as to the failure to<br />

make a bona fide public offering is triggered if<br />

the securities trade immediately in the secondary<br />

market at or above the public offering price. See<br />

NASD Rule 2750(d).<br />

17<br />

In this context, however, FINRA notes that<br />

“the appropriateness of placing unsold shares<br />

in a member’s investment account, and the<br />

subsequent resale of the shares, raises other<br />

potential issues under the federal securities laws<br />

or other FINRA rules and is beyond the scope<br />

of the proposed rule change.” See Proposing<br />

Release.<br />

5 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010


<strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> | Client Alert<br />

If you have any questions about<br />

this Client Alert, please contact<br />

Dana G. Fleischman or any of the<br />

<strong>Latham</strong> attorneys with whom you<br />

normally consult.<br />

Dana G. Fleischman<br />

+1.212.906.1220<br />

dana.fleischman@lw.com<br />

New York<br />

Client Alert is published by <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong> as a news reporting service to clients<br />

and other friends. The information contained in this publication should not be<br />

construed as legal advice. Should further analysis or explanation of the subject<br />

matter be required, please contact the attorney with whom you normally consult. A<br />

complete list of our Client Alerts can be found on our website at www.lw.com.<br />

If you wish to update your contact details or customize the information you receive<br />

from <strong>Latham</strong> & <strong>Watkins</strong>, please visit www.lw.com/<strong>Latham</strong>Mail.aspx to subscribe to<br />

our global client mailings program.<br />

Abu Dhabi<br />

Barcelona<br />

Beijing<br />

Brussels<br />

Chicago<br />

Doha<br />

Dubai<br />

Frankfurt<br />

Hamburg<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Houston<br />

London<br />

Los Angeles<br />

Madrid<br />

Milan<br />

Moscow<br />

Munich<br />

New Jersey<br />

New York<br />

Orange County<br />

Paris<br />

Riyadh*<br />

Rome<br />

San Diego<br />

San Francisco<br />

Shanghai<br />

Silicon Valley<br />

Singapore<br />

Tokyo<br />

Washington, D.C.<br />

* In association with the Law Office of Mohammed A. Al-Sheikh<br />

6 Number 1069 | August 5, 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!