Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...
Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...
Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
which is used in hydrology computations. Some flow conveyance<br />
information is available from the respective County Drain Commissioner’s<br />
offices, the MDEQ and as well as from some municipalities.<br />
Information on indicators is available in the form of organism biodiversity<br />
and population data, and physical characteristics as observed from the<br />
various inventory and screening efforts are all discussed in Section 3.<br />
Load Estimates<br />
Load estimates for altered hydrology are not specifically available rather<br />
surrogate estimates are used, namely the stream flow variations, flashiness<br />
indices and the amount of imperviousness within the watershed.<br />
Average annual stream flow statistics (annual minimums, maximums and<br />
average annual flows) are provided in Figure 5-1. This data shows that the<br />
<strong>Looking</strong> <strong>Glass</strong> <strong>River</strong> experienced much higher peak flows during the period<br />
of record than it has in the last 10 years. What is not evident in this<br />
information is the cause of the maximum flows, i.e. the combination of land<br />
use, conveyance pathways and precipitation. A detailed historical flow<br />
characterization of the <strong>Looking</strong> <strong>Glass</strong> <strong>River</strong> is beyond the scope of this<br />
watershed management plan.<br />
Figure 5-1 Stream Flow at Eagle (USGS 04114498)<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
Streamflow (cfs)<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
1944<br />
1949<br />
1954<br />
1959<br />
1964<br />
1969<br />
1974<br />
1979<br />
1984<br />
1989<br />
1994<br />
1999<br />
2004<br />
The term “flashy” as applied to stream flow has no set definition and in<br />
general flashy streams have rapid rates of change and stable streams have<br />
slow rates of change. The Richards-Baker Flashiness Index (abbreviated R-B<br />
Index) was calculated for the available stream flow data (Baker 2004). The R-<br />
B Index measures oscillations in flow relative to the total flow.<br />
The calculated R-B Index has varied over time with an average value of 0.10<br />
based on the USGS gauging station data, refer to Figure 5-2. According to<br />
the paper on the R-B index (Baker, 2004) an index value of 0.10 for these size<br />
watersheds is in the lowest quartile of flashiness when compared to the data<br />
from other sites. It should be noted that in the Baker study the flashier<br />
streams were outside of Michigan. For comparison purposes one of the most<br />
stable streams in Michigan is the Au Sable <strong>River</strong> which has an R-B Index of<br />
0.043 computed on the South Branch near Luzern.<br />
Another way to look at the R-B Index is to consider the trend over time.<br />
Based on the graph the <strong>Looking</strong> <strong>Glass</strong> <strong>River</strong> appears relatively stable over<br />
the last 50 years.<br />
Section 5: Stressor Summary 5-11