Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

determining goals and desires for the watershed, such as, developing a recreational trail along the river. During the public participation process, the public was given the opportunity to express their watershed desires. The public identified the following watershed desires: • Address pollutants entering watershed • Increase public education and awareness • Determine a funding mechanism for program • Assure that measurable actions are developed to track program success Friends of the Looking Glass River Likewise, the stakeholders were also given an opportunity to develop a list of watershed desires. This list was prioritized by the stakeholders and is provided below: 1. Sustained Funding Mechanisms 2. Increase Zoning Options 3. Increase and Enhanced Recreational Opportunities 4. Wetland Preservation 5. Increase Public Awareness 6. Increase Riparian Buffers 7. Slow Storm Water Runoff Velocity 8. Increased School Programs 9. Balanced Watershed Resources 10. Protect Storm Drain Inlets – Stenciling /Neighborhood Stewardship 11. Flood Control 12. Diverse, Enhanced Aquatic Life 13. Increase Tourism 14. Decrease Sediment Loading 15. Preserve Open Space 16. Allow water reuse on development sites References Center for Watershed Protection, Rapid Watershed Planning Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide for Managing Watersheds. 1998 Draft Motor Oil Brochure: GLRC 2005 Section 4: Community Outreach 4-7
Introduction 5. Stressor Summary Watershed management planning requires an understanding of the causes and sources of pollutants and other stressors (e.g., hydromodification) in the watershed, a quantifiable measurement of the pollutants and other stressors affecting the watershed, and a comparison of the current levels of pollutants and stressors against required water quality metrics (i.e., water quality standards). This section presents significant information that is sometimes redundant with other sections. This is because the analyses presented herein are best understood if all pertinent information is presented. Section 3 presented a detailed description of the causes and sources affecting conditions in the subwatershed, as well as the water quality metrics used to assess watershed conditions. Each of the causes and sources described in Section 3 result in one or more types of pollutants or stressors that adversely impact the watershed. This section provides a more detailed look at the primary pollutants and stressors generated by those causes and sources. It is important to note that the problem assessment and stressor summary for the subwatershed reflects the best sources of data available at the time of analysis. The analysis will change over time as a result of new data collected and changes in the metrics used to assess water quality data. Watershed management planning is an iterative and dynamic process that requires the use of adaptive management, allowing strategies to evolve as new information becomes available. The analysis contained in this Section will require regular re-assessment and re-evaluation as new data become available to ensure that strategies and priorities reflect the most accurate and most recent information. Status of Designated Uses Based on the MDEQ-defined waterbody impairments and other information in Section 3, as well as the input summarized in Section 4, the designated uses that are threatened, impaired, or of indeterminate status have been identified and are presented in Table 5-1. Section 5: Stressor Summary 5-1
Page 2 and 3:
GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5:
P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11:
FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13:
Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15:
9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19:
The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21:
Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23:
• methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25: References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33: The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35: commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39: Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41: References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43: 3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45: sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47: Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49: Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 50 and 51: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 52 and 53: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 54 and 55: Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57: Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59: Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61: Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63: The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67: Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69: 4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71: Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73: Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 76 and 77: Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79: Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81: the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83: Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85: day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87: Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89: It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97: Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107: References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109: Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111: Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113: Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115: producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117: Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119: 8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121: Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123: 9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 124 and 125:
Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127:
Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129:
The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131:
Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133:
Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135:
Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137:
Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139:
Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141:
The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143:
“It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145:
each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147:
A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149:
B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151:
C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153:
D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155:
Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157:
Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?