Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The majority of wetlands in the watershed exist in the subwatersheds of Upper Remey Chandler, Middle Vermilion Creek, and Mud Creek (each having 12% of the total). Subwatershed Table 2-3 Wetlands Wetland Acres Wetland Coverage Subwatershed Wetland (ac) per Watershed Wetland (ac) Clise Drain 1,494 23% 9% Faiver Drain 387 7% 2% Graneer Drain 1,676 33% 10% Upper Vermilion 1,749 23% 11% Looking Glass A 1,400 27% 9% Looking Glass B 463 6% 3% Lower Remey Chandler 634 10% 4% Lower Vermilion Creek 1,012 35% 6% Mud Creek 1,916 32% 12% Prairie & Gunderman 515 11% 3% Summer Drain 619 10% 4% Turkey Creek 376 11% 2% Upper Remey Chandler 1,937 23% 12% Middle Vermilion Creek 1,891 33% 12% Watershed Total 16,070 20% 100% Importance of Headwater Streams Headwater streams and wetlands are often undefined, unmapped, small locations which provide the water that flows and maintains our river systems. The term “headwater” refers to the smallest stream or wetland that flows into a stream network. Regional studies have shown that these headwater streams and wetlands make up more than 80% of the nation’s stream network. These waterways provide many of the benefits that scientists call “ecosystem services”. They provide groundwater filtering and recharge, recycling of waste products, flood control, spawning and mating grounds for fish and wildlife, and the water for human use. Most importantly, headwater streams and wetlands provide the basis for improved water quality in our watersheds. Climate The climate of the Looking Glass watershed can generally be described as one having a warm summer and a cool-to-cold winter. The average temperature in the region is highly seasonal. The average temperature for the month of January, the coldest month, is 22.7° F while August, the warmest month, has an average temperature of 71.2° F – a difference of 48.5 °F. The average annual precipitation is 32.82 inches. Like the temperature, it is seasonally variable, with February, the driest month receiving 1.57 inches on average, while June, the wettest month, receives 3.73 inches on average – a difference of approximately 2.2 inches. In the months of October through April, a portion of precipitation typically occurs as snowfall. The greatest amount of snowfall occurs in January (13.4 inches on average – approximately equivalent to 1.3 inches of rainfall) and “The physical, chemical, and biotic integrity of our nations’ waters is subtained by service provided by wetlands and headwaters streams” - Where Rivers are Born:: The Scientific Imperative for Defending Small Streams and Wetlands, 2003 2-8 Looking Glass River Watershed April 2007
accounts for 75% of the precipitation for the month. The months of June through August average no snowfall, while May and September may receive trace amounts. The wind in the region generally comes from the west / southwest at 9mph during the summer and 12 mph during the winter. The peak gusts generally occur in the spring / early summer. More detailed climatic information is presented in Table 2-4. Month Average Temperature (°F) Table 2-4 Climatic Data Average Precipitation* (inches) Average Snowfall** (inches) Prevailing Wind Direction Average Wind Speed (mph) Peak Gust Wind Speed (mph) January 22.7 1.78 13.4 SW 12 55 February 24.4 1.57 9.1 W 12 51 March 33.7 2.28 7.4 W 12 61 April 46.0 3.12 2.0 W 12 70 May 57.4 3.36 Trace W 10 59 June 67.1 3.73 0.0 W 9 67 July 71.2 3.09 0.0 W 9 60 August 69.2 3.33 0.0 W 8 62 September 61.7 3.27 Trace S 9 47 October 50.6 2.62 0.3 SW 10 58 November 38.1 2.56 3.6 SW 12 53 December 27.2 2.11 11.3 SW 12 54 Total --- 32.82 46.9 --- --- --- Note: Temperature and precipitation data is an aggregate of data from Ionia, Clinton, Shiawassee, Barry, Eaton, Ingham, Calhoun, Jackson, St. Joseph, Branch, and Hillsdale Counties from 1931-2000. The snowfall data is an average of the 30-year means for stations in Lansing and Jackson. The wind data is from a station in Lansing from 1930-1996. * - Includes snowfall. ** - As a general rule, divide the snowfall amount by ten to convert to equivalent inches of rainfall. Source: NOAA, no date; NCDC, 1998; NCDC, 2002. Soil Associations The ten soil associations present in the watershed include: • Urban land/Marlette/Capac • Marlette/Capac/Owosso • Oshtema/Houghton/Riddle s • Marlette/Oshtemo/Capac • Marlette/Capac/Parkhill • Boyer/Marlette/Houghton • Houghton/Gilford/Adrian • Miami/Conover/Brookston • Boyer/Wasepi/Spinks • Carlisle/Gilford/Tawas Geology and Soils Michigan has been subjected to four glacial periods: Wisconsian, Illinoian, Nebraskan, and Kansian. The last of these continental glaciers, the Wisconsian, existed approximately 11,000 years ago and is responsible for much of the development of Michigan’s underlying geology, soils, topography, and the Great Lakes. In the Looking Glass Watershed the predominant underlying geology is primarily: • Glacial till – poorly sorted and poorly rounded material ranging in size from pebbles to boulders • Glacial outwash – finer material deposited by glacial melt water • Lacustrian material – fine materials deposited in still or ponded glacial meltwater • Alluvian material – recently deposited material from local rivers and streams Each of these deposited materials, along with organic material, are the parent materials of the soils present in the watershed. These soils are predominantly sandy, loamy, sandy loams, clay loams or muck soils and are Section 2: Watershed Characteristics 2-9
Page 2 and 3: GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5: P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7: Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9: SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11: FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13: Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15: 9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19: The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21: Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23: • methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25: References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 34 and 35: commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39: Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41: References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43: 3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45: sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47: Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49: Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 54 and 55: Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57: Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59: Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61: Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63: The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67: Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69: 4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71: Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73: Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75: determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77: Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79: Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81: the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83:
Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85:
day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87:
Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89:
It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91:
Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93:
Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95:
Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97:
Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99:
Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101:
equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103:
Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105:
general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107:
References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109:
Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111:
Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113:
Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115:
producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117:
Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119:
8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121:
Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123:
9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 124 and 125:
Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127:
Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129:
The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131:
Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133:
Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135:
Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137:
Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139:
Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141:
The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143:
“It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145:
each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147:
A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149:
B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151:
C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153:
D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155:
Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157:
Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?