Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...
Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ... Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...
Evaluation Action Plan At the end of this section is the evaluation plan table. Summary The framework presented here is not meant to be inclusive, but rather a guide illustrating the embodiment of the watershed management plan. The emphasis of the plan is to focus on high priority constituents, sources, benefits etc. rather than all potential problems. Attention is given to the importance of long-term assessments that boast strategy rather than ambition. References CWP (Center for Watershed Protection). “Stormwater Practice Design; Watershed Leadership Kit.” Volume 5. Last accessed, June 2005. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. “Michigan Water Quality Monitoring Strategy Update.” April 2005. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. “Wastewater Discharge General Permit”. 1997. Mitchell, Mark K. and William B. Stapp. “Field Manual for Water Quality Monitoring”. 2000. San Diego Municipal Storm Water Co-Permittees. “A Framework for Assessing the Effectiveness of Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Programs”. 2003. Section 9: Evaluation Mechanisms 9-15
Evaluation Mechanisms Water Quality Monitoring Water Quality Monitoring Water Quality Monitoring Water Quality Monitoring Water Quality Monitoring Road Stream Crossing Survey Road Stream Crossing Survey Road Stream Crossing Survey Road Stream Crossing Survey Road Stream Crossing Survey Public Awareness Assessment Public Awareness Assessment Public Awareness Assessment Public Awareness Assessment Public Awareness Assessment Eval No. Action No Action 1 1 Choose 15-25 monitoring sites (throughout all three watersheds) to monitor annually. 1 2 Determine funding and availability of local groups to conduct monitoring. Lead Agency Hab-Rec Com Hab-Rec Com 1 3 Conduct monitoring Hab-Rec Com 1 4 Review results of Hab-Rec monitoring (from all Com groups such as Project Green, Mid-MEAC, ICHD, MDEQ, MDNR etc.) and evaluate implications on watershed activities 1 5 Post data and analysis to GLRC the GLRC Web site. Crd 2 1 Determine locations of all road stream crossings within watershed using GIS/maps. Group road stream crossing locations so that 20% of the total number of crossings are surveyed each year and 100% of the crossings are surveyed every five years. 2 2 Determine annual funding and availability of local groups to conduct monitoring. 2 3 Conduct road stream crossing surveys. Hab-Rec Com Hab-Rec Com Hab-Rec Com 2 4 Compile the data Hab-Rec Com 2 5 Post data and analysis to the GLRC Web site. 3 1 Develop a Public Awareness Assessment and provide opportunity for communities to review. 3 2 Develop an assessement sampling methodology GLRC Crd Schedule Material Cost Estimate Labor Hour Estimate Begin By Complete By Comment Jun-06 Dec-06 none 20 hours Jun-06 Dec-06 none 40 hours Jun-07 Long Term Annually $500-$2,000 per site TBD Aug 07 on-going Annually none 20-60 hours per year Dec-07 Long Annually none 40 hours Term Jun-06 Dec-06 none 20 hours Jun-06 Dec-06 none 40 hours Jun-07 Jun-07 Dec-07 Long Term Long Term Long Term 3 3 Conduct assessment PEP Com Jun-07 Long Term 3 4 Evaluate the results and make recommendations for changes . 3 6 Post results to the GLRC Web site. Annually $50-$150 per site 40 hours Annually $3,000-$6,000 20 - 80 hours Annually none 40 hours annually PEP Com Jun-06 Dec-06 none 40 to 200 hours PEP Com Jun-06 Dec-06 none 40 to 200 hours PEP Com Sep-07 Long Term GLRC Crd Sep-07 Long Term Repeat every 2 to 5 years Repeat after each survey Typical Cost: $200 per survey TBD none TBD 10 hours annually 9-16 GLRC Watersheds April 2007
- Page 86 and 87: Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
- Page 88 and 89: It should also be noted that the su
- Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
- Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
- Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
- Page 96 and 97: Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
- Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
- Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
- Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
- Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
- Page 106 and 107: References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
- Page 108 and 109: Several programs are available loca
- Page 110 and 111: Better Site Design Better site desi
- Page 112 and 113: Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
- Page 114 and 115: producers to meet personal objectiv
- Page 116 and 117: Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
- Page 118 and 119: 8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
- Page 120 and 121: Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
- Page 122 and 123: 9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
- Page 124 and 125: Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
- Page 126 and 127: Program Implementation Program impl
- Page 128 and 129: The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
- Page 130 and 131: Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
- Page 132 and 133: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
- Page 134 and 135: Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
- Page 138 and 139: Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
- Page 140 and 141: The committee defined appropriate w
- Page 142 and 143: “It is the purpose of this Memora
- Page 144 and 145: each other about how to protect and
- Page 146 and 147: A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
- Page 148 and 149: B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
- Page 150 and 151: C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
- Page 152 and 153: D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
- Page 154 and 155: Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
- Page 156 and 157: Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
Evaluation<br />
Mechanisms<br />
Water Quality<br />
Monitoring<br />
Water Quality<br />
Monitoring<br />
Water Quality<br />
Monitoring<br />
Water Quality<br />
Monitoring<br />
Water Quality<br />
Monitoring<br />
Road Stream<br />
Crossing<br />
Survey<br />
Road Stream<br />
Crossing<br />
Survey<br />
Road Stream<br />
Crossing<br />
Survey<br />
Road Stream<br />
Crossing<br />
Survey<br />
Road Stream<br />
Crossing<br />
Survey<br />
Public<br />
Awareness<br />
Assessment<br />
Public<br />
Awareness<br />
Assessment<br />
Public<br />
Awareness<br />
Assessment<br />
Public<br />
Awareness<br />
Assessment<br />
Public<br />
Awareness<br />
Assessment<br />
Eval No.<br />
Action No<br />
Action<br />
1 1 Choose 15-25 monitoring<br />
sites (throughout all three<br />
watersheds) to monitor<br />
annually.<br />
1 2 Determine funding and<br />
availability of local groups<br />
to conduct monitoring.<br />
Lead<br />
Agency<br />
Hab-Rec<br />
Com<br />
Hab-Rec<br />
Com<br />
1 3 Conduct monitoring Hab-Rec<br />
Com<br />
1 4 Review results of<br />
Hab-Rec<br />
monitoring (from all Com<br />
groups such as Project<br />
Green, Mid-MEAC, ICHD,<br />
MDEQ, MDNR etc.) and<br />
evaluate implications on<br />
watershed activities<br />
1 5 Post data and analysis to GLRC<br />
the GLRC Web site.<br />
Crd<br />
2 1 Determine locations of all<br />
road stream crossings<br />
within watershed using<br />
GIS/maps. Group road<br />
stream crossing locations<br />
so that 20% of the total<br />
number of crossings are<br />
surveyed each year and<br />
100% of the crossings are<br />
surveyed every five years.<br />
2 2 Determine annual funding<br />
and availability of local<br />
groups to conduct<br />
monitoring.<br />
2 3 Conduct road stream<br />
crossing surveys.<br />
Hab-Rec<br />
Com<br />
Hab-Rec<br />
Com<br />
Hab-Rec<br />
Com<br />
2 4 Compile the data Hab-Rec<br />
Com<br />
2 5 Post data and analysis to<br />
the GLRC Web site.<br />
3 1 Develop a Public<br />
Awareness Assessment<br />
and provide opportunity<br />
for communities to review.<br />
3 2 Develop an assessement<br />
sampling methodology<br />
GLRC<br />
Crd<br />
Schedule<br />
Material Cost<br />
Estimate<br />
Labor Hour<br />
Estimate<br />
Begin<br />
By<br />
Complete<br />
By<br />
Comment<br />
Jun-06 Dec-06 none 20 hours<br />
Jun-06 Dec-06 none 40 hours<br />
Jun-07 Long<br />
Term<br />
Annually $500-$2,000 per<br />
site<br />
TBD<br />
Aug 07 on-going Annually none 20-60 hours<br />
per year<br />
Dec-07 Long Annually none 40 hours<br />
Term<br />
Jun-06 Dec-06 none 20 hours<br />
Jun-06 Dec-06 none 40 hours<br />
Jun-07<br />
Jun-07<br />
Dec-07<br />
Long<br />
Term<br />
Long<br />
Term<br />
Long<br />
Term<br />
3 3 Conduct assessment PEP Com Jun-07 Long<br />
Term<br />
3 4 Evaluate the results and<br />
make recommendations for<br />
changes .<br />
3 6 Post results to the GLRC<br />
Web site.<br />
Annually<br />
$50-$150 per<br />
site<br />
40 hours<br />
Annually $3,000-$6,000 20 - 80 hours<br />
Annually none 40 hours<br />
annually<br />
PEP Com Jun-06 Dec-06 none 40 to 200<br />
hours<br />
PEP Com Jun-06 Dec-06 none 40 to 200<br />
hours<br />
PEP Com Sep-07 Long<br />
Term<br />
GLRC<br />
Crd<br />
Sep-07<br />
Long<br />
Term<br />
Repeat<br />
every 2 to<br />
5 years<br />
Repeat<br />
after each<br />
survey<br />
Typical Cost:<br />
$200 per<br />
survey<br />
TBD<br />
none<br />
TBD<br />
10 hours<br />
annually<br />
9-16 GLRC <strong>Watershed</strong>s April 2007
Change language