06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc.<br />

Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Access Corridor Project<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

5.2 Operation, Maintenance and Surveillance<br />

GCU proposes to primarily utilize the road when local outfitters do not have customers in their<br />

lodges. This active period for local outfitters is understood to be approximately mid-May to late<br />

October, depending on ice conditions and market conditions.<br />

Mineral exploration and resource definition is an iterative process that is often contingent on<br />

successful results, financing and commodity prices. As a result, it is difficult to precisely define the<br />

planned use of the proposed road for the next several years. However, GCU currently envisions use<br />

that will vary by season, as summarized in the bullets below.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

It is currently anticipated that three (3) to four (4) trips per week will be required to move<br />

materials and personnel to and from the camp during freeze-up conditions when the road is<br />

frozen. These trips will be via highway vehicles, either crew van or transport truck. This does<br />

not include periodic snow removal.<br />

Outside the freeze-up period, it is anticipated that no more than one (1) trip per week will be<br />

required to move materials to and from camp. GCU would use highway vehicles (likely a 5<br />

tonne highway truck with a boom) to travel as far as the end of the FMP Approved Road.<br />

The highway truck would transfer palletized equipment using a boom onto an off-road<br />

haulage vehicle (i.e. Nodwell, Prinoth or equivalent) with a flat deck to transport it to the<br />

camp. GCU is evaluating large tracked machines capable of a 15,400 kg payload. The<br />

machine and a full payload is a combined 27,000 kg and has a ground pressure of 4.65 psi,<br />

which is less than a typical human footprint. The off-road haulage vehicle could also be<br />

utilized to drag in equipment as required and drag out garbage for disposal. The off-road<br />

haulage vehicle would normally be posted at the GCU camp and would likely replace or<br />

augment the skidder that is currently used to move drill rigs. Personnel would be flown in<br />

and out during this time of year due to the high cost of haulage using off-road equipment.<br />

Despite this expensive form of haulage, the availability of a land-based corridor to the area<br />

of the Deposit will greatly improve GCU’s ability to mobilize / de-mobilize heavy equipment<br />

(including drill rigs), import bulk consumables and export garbage for disposal at an MOE<br />

approved facility.<br />

In addition to higher haulage costs during summer months due to the use of off-road<br />

equipment, the potential for rutting on the winter road due to use outside of the freeze-up<br />

period, there is a natural incentive for GCU to focus its utilization of the road during winter<br />

months when the road is frozen and can be travelled using highway vehicles.<br />

Road use restrictions that are imposed as a condition of the Overall Benefit permit (refer to<br />

Section 3.4) and any other legislative requirements would be respected.<br />

It is GCU’s practice to effectively containerize garbage and ship it off-site for disposal in an effort to<br />

avoid attracting bears or other predators to the exploration site. This practice would continue if<br />

access were improved, as described herein.<br />

If the Project is allowed to proceed, empirical evidence would be gathered by an independent<br />

consultant to quantify the effects of noise, vibration, light and fugitive dust on local users of the area<br />

(i.e. boaters on nearby lakes, occupants at nearby lodges, etc.). Empirical data that is gathered on a<br />

real-time basis at sensitive locations is preferable to sole reliance on predictive models. In parallel,<br />

GCU is evaluating proven techniques to control noise and fugitive dust that are typically associated<br />

July 2013 Page 50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!