Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...
Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ... Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...
Supplemental Mitigation Measures for Potentially Significant Negative Residual Effects Potentially Significant Negative Effect Mitigation Measure* Implementation Strategy Caribou and caribou habitat (general effects) Restore road to productive wildlife habitat upon closure where possible (subsection 9 and 10 of ESA) Decomission 8.6 km of historic exploration trails throughout GCU property to reduce total amount of linear features on the landscape (subsection 10 of ESA) Support the implementation of specific silvicultural practices in approved areas to improve and create caribou habitat (subsection 10 of ESA) Avoid aggregate extraction activities within calving/nursery areas and winter habitat Pending guidance from MNR, install educational signage elsewhere within in the range (where there is public access) that is intended to help hunters distinguish between caribou and other ungulates (subsection 9 of ESA) Prohibit public access beyond the FMP Approved Road, focus usage during winter months, enforce 50 km/hr speed limit (subsection 9 of ESA) Minimize overall width of road wherever possible in order to reduce total linear feature size and area disturbed (subsection 10 of ESA) Integrate these mitigation measures into the Project execution plan (Section 5 of Final ESR). Continue to engage other parties regarding collaborations related to monitoring and habitat improvement. DST (2013A) provides further analysis and discussion. * includes whether the mitigation measure would avoid a prohibited activity under section 17 subsection 9 (species protection) or 10 (habitat protection) of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA") Note: For additional detail on these impacts and mitigation measures please see Appendix 4 of Final ESR (Biological Constraints for Springpole Gold Access Corridor Project Alterntatives Assessment)
- Page 361 and 362: GCU has hired qualified, independen
- Page 363 and 364: The basic environmental protection
- Page 365 and 366: 8. Like the Draft ESR, Notices were
- Page 367 and 368: A full record of consultation is pr
- Page 369 and 370: Page 7 1. Corridor alternatives pre
- Page 371 and 372: 13. “Stakeholders” refers solel
- Page 373 and 374: Page 10 1. Detailed comments on the
- Page 375 and 376: Page 13 1. GCU is proposing to clea
- Page 377 and 378: Page 15 1. GCU is open to developin
- Page 379 and 380: Page 17 1. The economic information
- Page 381 and 382: Page 18 1. This is not a requiremen
- Page 383 and 384: (which were not intended to describ
- Page 385 and 386: Page 21 1. Note that the OLT develo
- Page 387 and 388: Page 22 1. The statement that carib
- Page 389 and 390: Page 24 1. General comment on 5.3.2
- Page 391 and 392: Page 26 1. The background database
- Page 393 and 394: Page 29 1. Comments on Table 3: The
- Page 395 and 396: Page 31 1. Water quality at Springp
- Page 397 and 398: 9. The aquatics baseline report doe
- Page 399 and 400: assessed through toxicity testing a
- Page 401 and 402: Page 34 1. Life of this Project is
- Page 403 and 404: Page 36 1. These recommendations ar
- Page 405 and 406: Page 38 1. Domtar has approval unde
- Page 407 and 408: Page 39 1. This means simply that G
- Page 409 and 410: Page 42 1. The recommendations from
- Page 411: Supplemental Mitigation Measures fo
Supplemental Mitigation Measures for Potentially Significant Negative Residual Effects<br />
Potentially Significant<br />
Negative Effect<br />
Mitigation Measure*<br />
Implementation Strategy<br />
Caribou and caribou<br />
habitat (general effects)<br />
Restore road to productive wildlife habitat upon closure where possible<br />
(subsection 9 and 10 of ESA)<br />
Decomission 8.6 km of historic exploration trails throughout GCU<br />
property to reduce total amount of linear features on the landscape<br />
(subsection 10 of ESA)<br />
Support the implementation of specific silvicultural practices in<br />
approved areas to improve and create caribou habitat (subsection 10<br />
of ESA)<br />
Avoid aggregate extraction activities within calving/nursery areas and<br />
winter habitat<br />
Pending guidance from MNR, install educational signage elsewhere<br />
within in the range (where there is public access) that is intended to<br />
help hunters distinguish between caribou and other ungulates<br />
(subsection 9 of ESA)<br />
Prohibit public access beyond the FMP Approved Road, focus usage<br />
during winter months, enforce 50 km/hr speed limit (subsection 9 of<br />
ESA)<br />
Minimize overall width of road wherever possible in order to reduce<br />
total linear feature size and area disturbed (subsection 10 of ESA)<br />
Integrate these mitigation measures<br />
into the Project execution plan<br />
(Section 5 of <strong>Final</strong> ESR). Continue to<br />
engage other parties regarding<br />
collaborations related to monitoring<br />
and habitat improvement. DST<br />
(2013A) provides further analysis and<br />
discussion.<br />
* includes whether the mitigation measure would avoid a prohibited activity under section 17 subsection 9 (species protection) or 10<br />
(habitat protection) of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA")<br />
Note: For additional detail on these impacts and mitigation measures please see Appendix 4 of <strong>Final</strong> ESR (Biological Constraints for<br />
Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Access Corridor Project Alterntatives Assessment)