Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...
Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ... Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...
9. The potential effects of predation and hunting (with a focus on caribou) is presented throughout the ESR, appendix 4 Biological Constraints Report. 10. First Nation members assisted with all of our field activities and open house sessions were conducted to solicit input on all studies. They provided very valuable input and were an integral component of the success of GCU field programs. Gold Canyon Resources Inc. Response to TFTO Submission for Springpole Access Corridor Final ESR April 2013 Schedule 2/- 23-
Page 22 1. The statement that caribou data was based solely on literature reviews and modeling without on-site observations is incorrect. Two aerials surveys were conducted, caribou calving surveys were completed, trail cameras were deployed throughout the study area, and all caribou observations were recorded. The combination of literature review and the collection of field data cannot be considered "armchair effort" as suggested by the TFTO. These efforts required hundreds of hours of field time. This data is presented in the ESR in Appendix 4, Biological Constraints Report pg. 62-83 and in Appendix 5. 2. The statement that "the granting of a harvesting permit, prematurely, will only serve to push this animal into the extinct category" is inflammatory. Access corridors can be detrimental to caribou populations through the facilitation of predation. However, roads are frequently built in caribou habitat for forest management purposes, and with sufficient planning and mitigation, the two can coexist. 3. The caribou cumulative effects assessment screening report cannot be made available to the public due to the fact that it contains sensitive information such as the locations of caribou and caribou calving areas. All of the relevant data from this report was included in the ESR, Appendix 4, Biological Constraints Report. Gold Canyon Resources Inc. Response to TFTO Submission for Springpole Access Corridor Final ESR April 2013 Schedule 2/- 24-
- Page 335 and 336: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 337 and 338: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 339 and 340: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 341 and 342: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 343 and 344: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 345 and 346: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 347 and 348: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 349 and 350: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 351 and 352: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 353 and 354: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 355 and 356: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 357 and 358: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 359 and 360: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 361 and 362: GCU has hired qualified, independen
- Page 363 and 364: The basic environmental protection
- Page 365 and 366: 8. Like the Draft ESR, Notices were
- Page 367 and 368: A full record of consultation is pr
- Page 369 and 370: Page 7 1. Corridor alternatives pre
- Page 371 and 372: 13. “Stakeholders” refers solel
- Page 373 and 374: Page 10 1. Detailed comments on the
- Page 375 and 376: Page 13 1. GCU is proposing to clea
- Page 377 and 378: Page 15 1. GCU is open to developin
- Page 379 and 380: Page 17 1. The economic information
- Page 381 and 382: Page 18 1. This is not a requiremen
- Page 383 and 384: (which were not intended to describ
- Page 385: Page 21 1. Note that the OLT develo
- Page 389 and 390: Page 24 1. General comment on 5.3.2
- Page 391 and 392: Page 26 1. The background database
- Page 393 and 394: Page 29 1. Comments on Table 3: The
- Page 395 and 396: Page 31 1. Water quality at Springp
- Page 397 and 398: 9. The aquatics baseline report doe
- Page 399 and 400: assessed through toxicity testing a
- Page 401 and 402: Page 34 1. Life of this Project is
- Page 403 and 404: Page 36 1. These recommendations ar
- Page 405 and 406: Page 38 1. Domtar has approval unde
- Page 407 and 408: Page 39 1. This means simply that G
- Page 409 and 410: Page 42 1. The recommendations from
- Page 411 and 412: Supplemental Mitigation Measures fo
9. The potential effects of predation and hunting (with a focus on caribou) is presented throughout<br />
the ESR, appendix 4 Biological Constraints <strong>Report</strong>.<br />
10. First Nation members assisted with all of our field activities and open house sessions were<br />
conducted to solicit input on all studies. They provided very valuable input and were an integral<br />
component of the success of GCU field programs.<br />
<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc.<br />
Response to TFTO Submission for Springpole Access Corridor <strong>Final</strong> ESR<br />
April 2013 Schedule 2/- 23-