Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Page 21
1. Note that the OLT developed PREDICTED moose densities over large spatial scales. "Low
densities" is a subjective term and represents moose densities of between 0 and 0.17/km2,
compared to more southern areas of the boreal forest with "high" moose densities in the 0.22
to >0.30 range. The terms associated with these densities are a default density set by the OLT.
2. Our approach to developing estimates and inferences regarding moose densities was not flawed
and involved a more holistic approach than the provincial government uses to determine tag
allocations for wildlife management units throughout Ontario.
3. The study was discussed many times with the OMNR in order to ensure that data collection
efforts were relevant. GCU also conducted open house sessions with FN groups (See Section 3-1-
4, ESR) to discuss the planned studies and to receive feedback on every aspect of our baseline
data collection efforts.
4. Moose densities for the area were determined through OLT modeling (predicted moose
densities) as well as through the mapping of late winter moose habitat (Figure 2.15, pg. 39 of
ESR appendix 4 Biological Constraints Report)
5. Multiple aerial surveys were conducted over the area (2011, 2012). Aerial surveys for ungulates
are not conducted outside of winter because they are very difficult to see with no snow cover
and with leaves on the trees.
6. Calving and feeding area data was obtained from the Red Lake OMNR. Caribou calving surveys
were completed throughout the study area and on potential lakes adjacent to the eastern
corridor (ESR, appendix 4, Biological Constraints Report, pg. 72)
7. It is beyond the scope of a Class C EA to determine moose populations. We presented moose
densities in a 900 km2 study area and modeled predicted moose densities for the regional study
area.
8. The concept of range can be interpreted in many ways. It can mean the amount and
arrangement of summer and winter habitat, and it can relate to seasonal food abundance,
calving areas, mineral licks, and aquatic feeding areas, as well as other aspects. The ESR,
Appendix 4 Biological Constraints Report touched on the more important aspects of moose
range including later winter habitat (considered one of the most limiting factors to moose
populations) and identified known aquatic feeding areas and calving areas. The ESR also
addressed what the impacts (if any) would be to those resources through the construction of
the road (pages 37, 39, 43, and 58-60).
Gold Canyon Resources Inc.
Response to TFTO Submission for Springpole Access Corridor Final ESR
April 2013 Schedule 2/- 22-