Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ... Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

goldcanyon.ca
from goldcanyon.ca More from this publisher
06.05.2015 Views

Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) and GCU Financial Status (Section 5.12) The economic potential of the Springpole Gold Project is subject to ongoing assessment as information becomes available. The March 25, 2013 Preliminary Economic Assessment provides the most recent information and provides further justification to continue exploration work. The Project will safely and effectively enable further definition work on the gold deposit. That work will allow GCU to refine the economic information available to date and prepare a pre-feasibility and/or feasibility study for the development of the gold deposit into a mine. GCU is a publicly traded company and is subject to strict regulation regarding financial disclosure. First bullet: The baseline studies and impact analyses were completed with input from the provincial government, and in accordance with accepted practice. That information was included in the final ESR. TFTO’s recommendation proposes an environmental assessment more relevant to that warranted for a mine development and far beyond what is required for the proposed Project of an access road. Second bullet: The record of consultation is included in the final ESR. GCU is committed to working with Aboriginal groups whose rights may be impacted by GCU activities, and continues discussions to formalize its working relationship with the affected First Nations. TFTO Summary of Recommendations (Section 6) Third bullet: The environmental studies necessary for the assessment of the road project are included in the final ESR. TFTO’s recommendation would impose obligations far beyond those warranted or required for the impact of a seasonal access road. Fourth bullet: Although not specifically required by the Class Environmental Assessment process, potential cumulative impacts were considered throughout the final ESR and the preferred corridor has been selected to minimize cumulative impacts. The nature, intensity and duration of the Project are appropriate for a Class C Environmental Assessment and it is not a unique undertaking that warrants an individual (Category D) environmental assessment. Fifth bullet: The only outstanding recommended item is the Good Neighbour Policy. TFTO committed to GCU that it would provide a draft policy for discussion, but none has been proposed to date. Entering into such an agreement is a commitment in the final ESR. Gold Canyon Resources Inc. Response to TFTO Submission for Springpole Access Corridor Final ESR April 2013 Schedule 1/- 3-

The basic environmental protection and mitigation measures are incorporated into the final ESR (Section 5 and 6), along with details regarding implementation (Section 8). Adhering to the guidance documents and procedures in the final ESR removes the need for the recommended impact analysis. The rehabilitation plan is described in Section 5.3 of the final ESR. Sixth bullet: Financial disclosure that may be made publicly is made on a regular basis on GCU’s website, in accordance with regulatory requirements. GCU cannot disclose financial information to TFTO that has not been disclosed publicly and such a request is not reasonable. Seventh bullet: This is addressed and this recommendation is effectively integrated into Section 5.3 of the final ESR. Eighth bullet: The final ESR complies with the requirements of this Class Environmental Assessment. GCU provides public disclosure on its website in accordance with regulatory requirements. The Project is aligned with provincial government objectives, as articulated in Section 1.3 of the final ESR. Ninth bullet: An individual (Category D) environmental assessment is not appropriate for a simple, routine undertaking such as the one being proposed in the final ESR. The nature of the work is well understood, the mitigation measures are proven and values have been identified and are being avoided with the proposed corridor. Gold Canyon Resources Inc. Response to TFTO Submission for Springpole Access Corridor Final ESR April 2013 Schedule 1/- 4-

Preliminary<br />

Economic<br />

Assessment<br />

(“PEA”) and GCU<br />

Financial Status<br />

(Section 5.12)<br />

The economic potential of the Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Project is subject to<br />

ongoing assessment as information becomes available. The March 25,<br />

2013 Preliminary Economic Assessment provides the most recent<br />

information and provides further justification to continue exploration work.<br />

The Project will safely and effectively enable further definition work on the<br />

gold deposit. That work will allow GCU to refine the economic information<br />

available to date and prepare a pre-feasibility and/or feasibility study for<br />

the development of the gold deposit into a mine.<br />

GCU is a publicly traded company and is subject to strict regulation<br />

regarding financial disclosure.<br />

First bullet: The baseline studies and impact analyses were completed with<br />

input from the provincial government, and in accordance with accepted<br />

practice. That information was included in the final ESR. TFTO’s<br />

recommendation proposes an environmental assessment more relevant to<br />

that warranted for a mine development and far beyond what is required for<br />

the proposed Project of an access road.<br />

Second bullet: The record of consultation is included in the final ESR. GCU<br />

is committed to working with Aboriginal groups whose rights may be<br />

impacted by GCU activities, and continues discussions to formalize its<br />

working relationship with the affected First Nations.<br />

TFTO Summary of<br />

Recommendations<br />

(Section 6)<br />

Third bullet: The environmental studies necessary for the assessment of<br />

the road project are included in the final ESR. TFTO’s recommendation<br />

would impose obligations far beyond those warranted or required for the<br />

impact of a seasonal access road.<br />

Fourth bullet: Although not specifically required by the Class<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment process, potential cumulative impacts were<br />

considered throughout the final ESR and the preferred corridor has been<br />

selected to minimize cumulative impacts. The nature, intensity and<br />

duration of the Project are appropriate for a Class C <strong>Environmental</strong><br />

Assessment and it is not a unique undertaking that warrants an individual<br />

(Category D) environmental assessment.<br />

Fifth bullet:<br />

The only outstanding recommended item is the Good Neighbour Policy.<br />

TFTO committed to GCU that it would provide a draft policy for discussion,<br />

but none has been proposed to date. Entering into such an agreement is a<br />

commitment in the final ESR.<br />

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc.<br />

Response to TFTO Submission for Springpole Access Corridor <strong>Final</strong> ESR<br />

April 2013 Schedule 1/- 3-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!