06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Schedule 1: GCU Response to General Concerns stated in TFTO Submission<br />

GCU Response to TFTO Submission<br />

TFTO<br />

Submission<br />

(TFTO Section<br />

reference)<br />

Overview<br />

(Section 1)<br />

Inadequate First<br />

Nation<br />

Consultation<br />

(Section 1.2)<br />

Major concerns<br />

(Section 2.2)<br />

Lack of a Good<br />

Neighbour Policy<br />

(Section 4.1)<br />

GCU Response<br />

The TFTO Submission repeatedly refers to clearing of 645 km 2 of forested<br />

land and this is incorrect. The entire 43 km road corridor would require<br />

0.645 km 2 of clearing over a 43km corridor (43 km x 0.015 km). Of this<br />

0.645 km 2 of proposed clearing, approximately 0.33 km 2 is already<br />

approved to be cleared in the Trout Lake Forest Management Plan<br />

(approximately 22km x 0.015 km).<br />

The record of stakeholder consultations is included in the final ESR.<br />

The TFTO Submission speculates about potential impacts of the<br />

development of a mine. That speculation is beyond the scope of this ESR.<br />

If GCU seeks to develop the Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> project into a mine, a new<br />

environmental assessment process that will assess the broader impacts<br />

and benefits of such a development.<br />

The record of stakeholder consultations is included in the final ESR.<br />

The Crown has a legal obligation to consult Aboriginal groups. GCU has<br />

performed some of the procedural aspects of that consultation as<br />

delegated by the Crown. Those consultations are set out in detail in the<br />

final ESR. GCU remains strongly committed to working with Aboriginal<br />

groups whose Aboriginal and/or Treaty Rights may be affected by GCU’s<br />

activities.<br />

The issues noted in the TFTO Submission are dealt with in the final ESR<br />

and reasonable mitigation measures are proposed in the final ESR (see<br />

Tables 3.1 and 3.2 final ESR).<br />

GCU is willing to agree to a good neighbour policy with TFTO. In<br />

November 2012, a TFTO representative agreed to prepare a draft policy<br />

for discussion between GCU and TFTO. GCU has confirmed its<br />

willingness to agree to such a policy in subsequent discussion with TFTO,<br />

but nothing further has been proposed to date. Entering into such an<br />

agreement is a commitment in the final ESR.<br />

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc.<br />

Response to TFTO Submission for Springpole Access Corridor <strong>Final</strong> ESR<br />

April 2013 Schedule 1/- 1-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!