Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...
Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ... Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...
Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final Environmental Study Report Review March 30, 2013 and there was no background information provided regarding report interpretation or date of publication. The baseline study for woodland caribou consisted of a single aerial survey conducted on February 5, 2011 and database analysis from sources that were out of date and had no data available; Aerial survey was not conducted over known woodland caribou wintering, calving or refuge areas; Aerial survey was not conducted over an area relevant for the eastern corridor project; Database analysis for woodland caribou was referenced as having little to no available data for the study area. A thorough woodland caribou study needs to be conducted which takes into account the following parameters, relevant to eastern corridor development; Churchill woodland caribou herd numbers; Caribou herd range of occupancy; calving, refuge wintering areas, etc; Range disturbance by eastern corridor; Impact on food source; Degree of habitat fragmentation resulting from eastern corridor; Increased predation, hunting and vehicle kills; Cumulative impacts assessment on caribou; forestry, hunting, predation; First Nation involvement and traditional knowledge. The ESR and Technical Report state that insufficient data was available on woodland caribou to make any conclusions about the herd. Therefore, no conclusions regarding woodland caribou can be drawn from this study, and impacts to woodland caribou resulting from the eastern corridor cannot be regarded as insignificant. Recommendation: GCU in conjunction with Stakeholders, First Nation communities and the OMNR needs to undertake a thorough environmental assessment of woodland caribou within the regional project study area, utilizing areas relevant to the eastern corridor. Recommendation: Future desktop analysis of woodland caribou by GCU must include current data, and if the data is not available, GCU must clearly state that it is lacking. 5.3.1.3 Large mammals and furbearers Large mammals and furbearers were also assessed using the February 5, 2011 aerial survey. No additional follow-up studies were conducted. Empirical data on large mammals and furbearers (i.e. gray wolves, black bears, marten, lynx, beaver, muskrat, river otters, red fox, fisher) is absent from any reports generated by GCU. In the absence of data it is nearly impossible to draw any substantive conclusions about the environmental impacts to the flora and fauna in the Trout Forest and, hence, impossible to offer any mitigation measures to offset these environmental impacts. Nevertheless, GCU 23
Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final Environmental Study Report Review March 30, 2013 offers “principle mitigation measure designed to reduce the potential adverse effects to large mammals and furbearers … to restore the linear corridor and harvested patent land to productive wildlife habitat upon closure.” [Emphasis by this writer]. GCU will make the “ecology good” in the neighbourhood of twenty years!!! During this time period all large mammals and furbearers face a potential reduction in their numbers if not in their existence. Recommendation: GCU in conjunction with Stakeholders, First Nation communities and the OMNR needs to undertake a thorough environmental assessment of large mammals and furbearers within the regional project study area, utilizing areas relevant to the eastern corridor. 5.3.2 Small Mammal Trapping Deficiencies The small mammal survey was conducted by setting up 35 traps over an area less than
- Page 290 and 291: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 292 and 293: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 294 and 295: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 296 and 297: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 298 and 299: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 300 and 301: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 302 and 303: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 304 and 305: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 306 and 307: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 308 and 309: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 310 and 311: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 312 and 313: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 314 and 315: GOLD CANYON RESOURCES INC. GCU: TSX
- Page 316: Page 3 GCU’s mitigation measures
- Page 319 and 320: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 321 and 322: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 323 and 324: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 325 and 326: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 327 and 328: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 329 and 330: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 331 and 332: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 333 and 334: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 335 and 336: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 337 and 338: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 339: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 343 and 344: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 345 and 346: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 347 and 348: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 349 and 350: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 351 and 352: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 353 and 354: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 355 and 356: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 357 and 358: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 359 and 360: Gold Canyon Resources Inc: Final En
- Page 361 and 362: GCU has hired qualified, independen
- Page 363 and 364: The basic environmental protection
- Page 365 and 366: 8. Like the Draft ESR, Notices were
- Page 367 and 368: A full record of consultation is pr
- Page 369 and 370: Page 7 1. Corridor alternatives pre
- Page 371 and 372: 13. “Stakeholders” refers solel
- Page 373 and 374: Page 10 1. Detailed comments on the
- Page 375 and 376: Page 13 1. GCU is proposing to clea
- Page 377 and 378: Page 15 1. GCU is open to developin
- Page 379 and 380: Page 17 1. The economic information
- Page 381 and 382: Page 18 1. This is not a requiremen
- Page 383 and 384: (which were not intended to describ
- Page 385 and 386: Page 21 1. Note that the OLT develo
- Page 387 and 388: Page 22 1. The statement that carib
- Page 389 and 390: Page 24 1. General comment on 5.3.2
<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc: <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Review<br />
March 30, 2013<br />
offers “principle mitigation measure designed to reduce the potential adverse effects to<br />
large mammals and furbearers … to restore the linear corridor and harvested patent<br />
land to productive wildlife habitat upon closure.” [Emphasis by this writer].<br />
GCU will make the “ecology good” in the neighbourhood of twenty years!!! During this time<br />
period all large mammals and furbearers face a potential reduction in their numbers if not<br />
in their existence.<br />
Recommendation: GCU in conjunction with Stakeholders, First Nation communities and<br />
the OMNR needs to undertake a thorough environmental assessment of large mammals<br />
and furbearers within the regional project study area, utilizing areas relevant to the eastern<br />
corridor.<br />
5.3.2 Small Mammal Trapping Deficiencies<br />
The small mammal survey was conducted by setting up 35 traps over an area less than<br />