06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc.<br />

Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Access Corridor Project<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

3.0 CONSULTATION AND REQUIRED APPROVALS FOR PROJECT<br />

GCU has engaged in consultation with Aboriginal communities, non-Aboriginal stakeholders and<br />

government to explain the Project and to understand their respective interests. GCU has adjusted<br />

its Project in response to that consultation to avoid or mitigate any reasonable concerns identified<br />

and to align interests where possible. Although the EA process is intended to reach a conclusion<br />

with respect to consultation on a proposed undertaking, it is GCU`s position that consultation is an<br />

ongoing process, and as such GCU will continue to work with interested stakeholders and identified<br />

Aboriginal Communities during the life of the Project to share information on the Project and<br />

respond to concerns. This document describes the on-going consultation process that has been<br />

undertaken to date, which is regarded as sufficiently advanced to identify the concerns associated<br />

with an undertaking such as the proposed Project.<br />

3.1 Aboriginal Communities<br />

GCU has engaged in consultation with Aboriginal communities with established or asserted<br />

Aboriginal and Treaty rights in the Project area, under the guidance and direction of the Ontario<br />

government. GCU is committed to continue meaningful engagement with the Aboriginal<br />

communities beyond the conclusion of this EA.<br />

In addition to the extensive work that GCU undertook to identify and mitigate project impacts<br />

generally, GCU also consulted in good-faith with Aboriginal communities on the Project to identify<br />

specific aboriginal interests. The discussion that follows summarizes the efforts to consult the<br />

Aboriginal communities that have been identified by the Ontario government.<br />

3.1.1 Cat Lake, Slate Falls and Lac Seul First Nations (The Protocol Nations)<br />

GCU has engaged in consultation with the First Nations of Cat Lake, Slate Falls, and Lac Seul, who<br />

were identified to GCU by the Crown in 2009 as the affected First Nations with respect to the<br />

Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Project site.<br />

On 22 May 2012, Chiefs from the First Nation communities of Cat Lake, Slate Falls and Lac Seul<br />

signed an internal protocol agreement, in which they agreed to work together for the purpose of<br />

negotiations with GCU.<br />

A Working Committee, with members from each of the Protocol Nations, meets on a regular basis to<br />

discuss the progress of the Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Project and the development of an agreement between<br />

GCU and the Protocol Nations that would allow the Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Project to be developed with<br />

the support of the Protocol Nations, while respecting their Aboriginal and Treaty Rights. GCU is<br />

engaged in ongoing discussions with this Working Committee.<br />

Although there had been previous discussion about the possibility of an access road to the<br />

Springpole <strong>Gold</strong> Project in 2011, the current access corridor proposal was first presented to the<br />

working group on 10 February 2012.<br />

A map of the proposed access alternatives was informally presented to interested First Nation<br />

representatives after a formal meeting in Thunder Bay, and a copy was given to each of the Chiefs,<br />

and to the Working Committee Chair for further deliberation and future discussion. GCU requested<br />

an opportunity to present the proposal to the Working Committee in a more formal setting at an<br />

July 2013 Page 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!