06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc: <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Review<br />

March 30, 2013<br />

Recommendation: The OMNR needs to investigate the safety of the Wenasaga road, and<br />

determine the large truck allowance for the seasonal corridor.<br />

5.2.1 <strong>Study</strong> Area Dimensions<br />

The below terminology is used throughout the GCU ESR and Technical <strong>Report</strong>s to describe<br />

the areas in which field work or desk-top surveys were conducted. For each Technical<br />

<strong>Report</strong>, and depending on what was being assessed, study area dimensions differ. Despite<br />

the fact that there are varied study areas, the same terminology is used throughout all ESR<br />

documents to describe these areas.<br />

The maps provided by GCU to depict where the study areas are located are of poor quality<br />

and have low resolution, limiting ones ability to actually read any land base descriptions.<br />

<strong>Study</strong> Area Terminology Used:<br />

Regional study area<br />

Local study area<br />

<strong>Study</strong> site<br />

Springpole study area - general<br />

Throughout the ESR and Technical <strong>Report</strong>s there is one reference to the actual amount of<br />

land surveyed for wildlife: It was stated that 81 km 2 was surveyed during the aerial wildlife<br />

fieldwork study (Draft Springpole Terrestrial Baseline <strong>Report</strong> 2011<br />

What is not discussed are the specific land quantums for any of the above listed “study<br />

areas”, nor rationale to justify/explain the why the area and amount of land was selected.<br />

In most cases, the field study work was conducted in overlapping locations within 1km of<br />

the primary Springpole camp site, a location which the drills operate <strong>24</strong> hours a day.<br />

After review of the study areas used by GCU, it appears as though only small local<br />

study areas were selected from within the Springpole study area in order to dilute<br />

the impact of potential findings to make them appear insignificant.<br />

Furthermore, the location of all the local study areas used to for the baseline studies,<br />

are located nowhere near the intended corridor.<br />

Recommendation: GCU needs to explicitly define each study area used within all baseline<br />

technical reports for which fieldwork and desktop analysis was conducted in, and indicate<br />

within the ESR where exactly the baseline studies were conducted in relation to the eastern<br />

corridor.<br />

Recommendation: GCU needs to conduct a Class D <strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment specific for<br />

the eastern corridor.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!