06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc: <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Review<br />

March 30, 2013<br />

sampled, 53% of them were unclassified and did not match up with existing FRI data,<br />

which was attributed to “lack of accurate data for the current FRI (Terrestrial Baseline<br />

<strong>Report</strong>, page 3-3).”<br />

Overall, there are a variety of areas where the study was deficient;<br />

All 23 selected ecosites were within a small region of the larger study area, and were<br />

not representative of the overall study area or the eastern corridor;<br />

The study failed to determine what vegetative species were present in the area<br />

through field work;<br />

No reference made to the forest fire and cumulative impacts to vegetation;<br />

No discussion regarding harvesting 645 km2 of timber and its impacts on vegetative<br />

biodiversity;<br />

No discussion on how the eastern corridor would impact endangered, threatened,<br />

special concern or extirpated vegetative species;<br />

No environmental protection and mitigation measures proposed for vegetative<br />

species at risk;<br />

No discussion on potentially important wildlife plant food sources that may be<br />

compromised;<br />

No statistics provided to determine accuracy of reporting.<br />

As with the other terrestrial baseline studies, conclusions were drawn about the low<br />

impact of the project on terrestrial parameters, based on flawed methodology and lack of<br />

data: “None of these stands have been found to occur within the RSA, therefore the<br />

potential environmental effects are considered to be negligible and no mitigation is<br />

required (Draft ESR, page 3-28).”<br />

Based on the narrow analysis used to derive these unsubstantiated conclusions, it is<br />

fair to say that this study was unscientific, poorly conducted and results are<br />

inconclusive.<br />

Recommendation: GCU needs to conduct a thorough fieldwork vegetation study in<br />

conjunction with First Nation communities that documents all ecosites, plant species and<br />

communities relevant to the eastern corridor.<br />

Recommendation: During the next vegetation study, GCU will document the plant species<br />

that are listed in the Ontario Species At Risk - Vascular Plants list, and those that are used<br />

within First Nation traditional purposes.<br />

Recommendation: The road closure and rehabilitation plan developed for the eastern<br />

corridor needs to have all plant communities well documented, and outline how revegetation<br />

will occur in order to return those sites back to their original states.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!