06.05.2015 Views

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

Revised Final Environmental Study Report (24 MB) - Gold Canyon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gold</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> Resources Inc: <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Review<br />

March 30, 2013<br />

Within the Aquatics baseline <strong>Report</strong>, it has been identified that there is a dramatic<br />

elevation in heavy metals in Springpole compared to what is approved in Provincial<br />

Water Quality Objectives (PWQO) (Section 4.4). GCU has been conducting<br />

exploratory drilling in Springpole for many years, which strongly supports the<br />

possibility that GCU drilling activities are polluting Springpole.<br />

If GCU activities are found to increase the heavy metal content in Springpole and<br />

surrounding lakes, they will be in direct violation of the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act.<br />

Relevant Acts that are missing from GCU ESR but are not limited to:<br />

Ontario Water Resources Act<br />

Ontario Heritage Act<br />

Expropriations Act<br />

Ontario Road Access Act<br />

Federal Species At Risk Act – vascular plants and mosses<br />

Ontario Endangered Species Act – vascular plants and mosses<br />

3.2 Ontario Water Resources Act<br />

As previously discussed within the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act, there is a<br />

responsibility of the proponent to ensure that lakes and rivers are not contaminated by<br />

their activities. In addition to that, given that Springpole and surrounding lakes provide<br />

drinking water tourist operations and private land-owners, there is an additional<br />

requirement that the pristine lakes are kept free of contaminants. Given the Preliminary<br />

Economic Assessment (PEA) was completed after the ESR submission by GCU, there is no<br />

discussion of how such matters as “dike construction”, “dewatering” and “open pit<br />

development” will be addressed within the context of existing water regulations.<br />

Ontario Water Resources Act: Water, 2011, c. 9, Sched. 27, s. 36<br />

“Purpose<br />

0.1 The purpose of this Act is to provide for the conservation, protection and<br />

management of Ontario’s waters and for their efficient and sustainable use, in order to<br />

promote Ontario’s long-term environmental, social and economic well-being. 2007, c. 12,<br />

s. 1 (1).”<br />

“Examination for pollution<br />

(2) The Minister may examine any surface waters or ground waters in Ontario from<br />

time to time to determine what, if any, pollution exists and the causes thereof. R.S.O. 1990,<br />

c. O.40, s. 29 (2).”<br />

“Injunction to prevent pollution of water<br />

(3) Where any person is discharging or causing or permitting the discharge of any<br />

material of any kind into or in or near any waters that, in the opinion of the Minister, may<br />

impair the quality of the water in such waters, the Minister may apply without notice to the<br />

Superior Court of Justice for an order prohibiting such discharge for such period not<br />

exceeding twenty-one days and on such terms and conditions as a judge considers proper, and<br />

such order may, on application to the Court, be continued for such period and on such terms<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!